Literature DB >> 30228045

Optimization of Phase-Change Contrast Agents for Targeting MDA-MB-231 Breast Cancer Cells.

Kyle P Hadinger1, Joseph P Marshalek1, Paul S Sheeran2, Paul A Dayton3, Terry O Matsunaga4.   

Abstract

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of death for women throughout the world. Recent advances in medical imaging technologies and tumor targeting agents signify vast potential for progress toward improved management of this global problem. Phase-change contrast agents (PCCAs) are dynamic imaging agents with practical applications in both the research and clinical settings. PCCAs possess characteristics that allow for cellular uptake where they can be converted from liquid-phase PCCAs to gaseous microbubbles via ultrasound energy. Previously, we reported successful internalization of folate-targeted PCCAs in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells followed by ultrasound-mediated activation to produce internalized microbubbles. This study examines the binding, internalization and activation of folate-receptor targeted PCCAs in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells as a function of gaseous core compositions, incubation time and ultrasound exposure period. In vitro results indicate that internalization and ultrasound-mediated activation of PCCAs were significantly greater using a 50:50 mixture of decafluorobutane:dodecafluoropentane compared with other core compositions: 50:50 octafluoropropane:decafluorobutane (p < 0.0001), decafluorobutane (p < 0.04) and dodecafluoropentane (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, it was found that PCCAs composed of perfluorocarbons with higher boiling points responded with greater activation efficiency when exposed to 12 s of ultrasound exposure as opposed to 4 s of ultrasound exposure. When evaluating different incubation times, it was found that incubating the PCCAs with breast cancer cells for 60 min did not produce significantly greater internalization and activation compared with incubation for 10 min; this was concluded after comparing the number of microbubbles present per cell before ultrasound versus post-ultrasound, and finding a ratio of intracellular microbubbles post-ultrasound/pre-ultrasound, 3.46 versus 3.14, respectively. The data collected in this study helps illustrate further optimization of folate-receptor targeted PCCAs for breast cancer targeting and imaging.
Copyright © 2018 World Federation for Ultrasound in Medicine 8 Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Internalization; Microbubbles; Nanodroplets; Phase-change contrast agents; Targeting agent; Ultrasound-mediated activation; Vaporization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30228045      PMCID: PMC6215505          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.08.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  26 in total

1.  Design of ultrasonically-activatable nanoparticles using low boiling point perfluorocarbons.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Samantha H Luois; Lee B Mullin; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 12.479

2.  Application of ultrasound to selectively localize nanodroplets for targeted imaging and therapy.

Authors:  Paul A Dayton; Shukui Zhao; Susannah H Bloch; Pat Schumann; Kim Penrose; Terry O Matsunaga; Reena Zutshi; Alexander Doinikov; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 4.488

Review 3.  Cancer screening in the United States, 2015: a review of current American cancer society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening.

Authors:  Robert A Smith; Deana Manassaram-Baptiste; Durado Brooks; Mary Doroshenk; Stacey Fedewa; Debbie Saslow; Otis W Brawley; Richard Wender
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Formulation and acoustic studies of a new phase-shift agent for diagnostic and therapeutic ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Samantha Luois; Paul A Dayton; Terry O Matsunaga
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.882

Review 5.  Lipid-based nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced MRI and molecular imaging.

Authors:  Willem J M Mulder; Gustav J Strijkers; Geralda A F van Tilborg; Arjan W Griffioen; Klaas Nicolay
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Decafluorobutane as a phase-change contrast agent for low-energy extravascular ultrasonic imaging.

Authors:  Paul S Sheeran; Vincent P Wong; Samantha Luois; Ryan J McFarland; William D Ross; Steven Feingold; Terry O Matsunaga; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 2.998

Review 7.  Therapeutic applications of lipid-coated microbubbles.

Authors:  Evan C Unger; Thomas Porter; William Culp; Rachel Labell; Terry Matsunaga; Reena Zutshi
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2004-05-07       Impact factor: 15.470

Review 8.  Folate-targeted therapeutic and imaging agents for cancer.

Authors:  Philip Stewart Low; Sumith Anurasiri Kularatne
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 8.822

Review 9.  Acoustic and photoacoustic molecular imaging of cancer.

Authors:  Katheryne E Wilson; Tzu Yin Wang; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Folate receptor-α (FOLR1) expression and function in triple negative tumors.

Authors:  Brian M Necela; Jennifer A Crozier; Cathy A Andorfer; Laura Lewis-Tuffin; Jennifer M Kachergus; Xochiquetzal J Geiger; Krishna R Kalari; Daniel J Serie; Zhifu Sun; Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia; Alvaro Moreno Aspita; Daniel J O'Shannessy; Julia D Maltzman; Ann E McCullough; Barbara A Pockaj; Heather E Cunliffe; Karla V Ballman; E Aubrey Thompson; Edith A Perez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  Ultrasound molecular imaging for differentiation of benign and malignant tumors in patients.

Authors:  Fei Yan; Zhuqing Song; Meng Du; Alexander L Klibanov
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2018-12

2.  Synthesis of nanobubbles for improved ultrasound tumor-imaging applications.

Authors:  Juanjuan Zhang; Lunshou Wei; Yilin Zhao
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 3.  Phase-Change Materials for Controlled Release and Related Applications.

Authors:  Jichuan Qiu; Da Huo; Younan Xia
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 30.849

4.  Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging by nature-inspired ultrastable echogenic nanobubbles.

Authors:  Al de Leon; Reshani Perera; Christopher Hernandez; Michaela Cooley; Olive Jung; Selva Jeganathan; Eric Abenojar; Grace Fishbein; Amin Jafari Sojahrood; Corey C Emerson; Phoebe L Stewart; Michael C Kolios; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 7.790

5.  Extrusion: A New Method for Rapid Formulation of High-Yield, Monodisperse Nanobubbles.

Authors:  Claire Counil; Eric Abenojar; Reshani Perera; Agata A Exner
Journal:  Small       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 15.153

Review 6.  Ultrasound and Nanomedicine for Cancer-Targeted Drug Delivery: Screening, Cellular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Authors:  Chien-Hsiu Li; Yu-Chan Chang; Michael Hsiao; Ming-Hsien Chan
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 6.525

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.