Literature DB >> 30227524

Safety Information From Spontaneous and Literature Adverse Reaction Reports: A Comparison.

Janine Klose1, Simone Fröhling1, Elmar Kroth2, Thomas Dobmeyer1, Axel Nolting1.   

Abstract

Marketing authorization holders should report adverse drug reactions (ADRs) derived from spontaneous case reports and literature for their medicinal products to competent authorities. Yet the difference in quality of data from both sources has never been analyzed. To this end, YES Pharmaceutical Development Services in cooperation with the German Medicines Manufacturers Association has conducted an analysis examining more than 25,100 spontaneous and literature cases that occurred between 2007 and 2008. Reporting rates of ADRs for specific drug substances (DSs), expectedness, and the system organ class (SOC) referred to were examined. It was found that the distribution of ADRs to specific SOCs differs between both groups for selected DSs. For more than 37% of the DSs being evaluated, a difference of 10% or more regarding reporting rates of unexpected ADRs was observed between both groups. These findings underline the substantial importance of regular literature reviews in addition to the spontaneous reporting system for a sufficient safety assessment of medicinal products.

Keywords:  adverse drug reactions; expectedness; literature cases; spontaneous case reports

Year:  2013        PMID: 30227524     DOI: 10.1177/0092861512463920

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  1 in total

1.  Impact of literature reports on drug safety signals.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Ochyra; Maciej Szewczyk; Adam Przybylkowski
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 1.704

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.