Literature DB >> 30227471

Evaluating Source Data Verification as a Quality Control Measure in Clinical Trials.

Nicole Sheetz1, Brett Wilson2, Joanne Benedict3, Esther Huffman4, Andy Lawton5, Mark Travers6, Patrick Nadolny7, Stephen Young8, Kyle Given9, Lawrence Florin10.   

Abstract

TransCelerate has developed a risk-based monitoring methodology that transforms clinical trial monitoring from a model rooted in source data verification (SDV) to a comprehensive approach leveraging cross-functional risk assessment, technology, and adaptive on-site, off-site, and central monitoring activities to ensure data quality and subject safety. Evidence suggests that monitoring methods that concentrate on what is critical for a study and a site may produce better outcomes than do conventional SDV-driven models. This article assesses the value of SDV in clinical trial monitoring via a literature review, a retrospective analysis of data from clinical trials, and an assessment of major and critical findings from TransCelerate member company internal audits. The results support the hypothesis that generalized SDV has limited value as a quality control measure and reinforce the value of other risk-based monitoring activities.

Entities:  

Keywords:  data integrity; quality control; risk-based monitoring; source data review; source data verification

Year:  2014        PMID: 30227471     DOI: 10.1177/2168479014554400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  9 in total

1.  Does waiting times decrease or increase operational costs in short and long-term? Evidence from Portuguese public hospitals.

Authors:  André Madeira; Victor Moutinho; José Alberto Fuinhas
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2021-06-09

2.  A randomized evaluation of on-site monitoring nested in a multinational randomized trial.

Authors:  Nicole Wyman Engen; Kathy Huppler Hullsiek; Waldo H Belloso; Elizabeth Finley; Fleur Hudson; Eileen Denning; Catherine Carey; Mary Pearson; Jonathan Kagan
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Impact of a targeted monitoring on data-quality and data-management workload of randomized controlled trials: A prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Claire Fougerou-Leurent; Bruno Laviolle; Christelle Tual; Valérie Visseiche; Aurélie Veislinger; Hélène Danjou; Amélie Martin; Valérie Turmel; Alain Renault; Eric Bellissant
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2019-12-14       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Triggered or routine site monitoring visits for randomised controlled trials: results of TEMPER, a prospective, matched-pair study.

Authors:  Sally P Stenning; William J Cragg; Nicola Joffe; Carlos Diaz-Montana; Rahela Choudhury; Matthew R Sydes; Sarah Meredith
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 2.486

5.  Evaluation of the dietary intake data coding process in a clinical setting: Implications for research practice.

Authors:  Vivienne X Guan; Yasmine C Probst; Elizabeth P Neale; Linda C Tapsell
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Central statistical monitoring of investigator-led clinical trials in oncology.

Authors:  Marc Buyse; Laura Trotta; Everardo D Saad; Junichi Sakamoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Historical Benchmarks for Quality Tolerance Limits Parameters in Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Marcin Makowski; Ruma Bhagat; Soazig Chevalier; Steven A Gilbert; Dagmar R Görtz; Marta Kozińska; Patrick Nadolny; Melissa Suprin; Sabine Turri
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 1.778

8.  Risk-Based Monitoring in Clinical Trials: Increased Adoption Throughout 2020.

Authors:  Nicole Stansbury; Brian Barnes; Amy Adams; Ruth Berlien; Danilo Branco; Debby Brown; Paula Butler; Lauren Garson; Debra Jendrasek; Garrett Manasco; Nycole Ramirez; Nelly Sanjuan; Gillian Worman; Anina Adelfio
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 9.  Dynamic methods for ongoing assessment of site-level risk in risk-based monitoring of clinical trials: A scoping review.

Authors:  William J Cragg; Caroline Hurley; Victoria Yorke-Edwards; Sally P Stenning
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.486

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.