Literature DB >> 30227239

Comparison of multi-linear regression, particle swarm optimization artificial neural networks and genetic programming in the development of mini-tablets.

Panagiotis Barmpalexis1, Anna Karagianni2, Grigorios Karasavvaides2, Kyriakos Kachrimanis2.   

Abstract

In the present study, the preparation of pharmaceutical mini-tablets was attempted in the framework of Quality by Design (QbD) context, by comparing traditionally used multi-linear regression (MLR), with artificially-intelligence based regression techniques (such as standard artificial neural networks (ANNs), particle swarm optimization (PSO) ANNs and genetic programming (GP)) during Design of Experiment (DoE) implementation. Specifically, the effect of diluent type and particle size fraction for three commonly used direct compression diluents (lactose, pregelatinized starch and dibasic calcium phosphate dihydrate, DCPD) blended with either hydrophilic or hydrophobic flowing aids was evaluated in terms of: a) powder blend properties (such as bulk (Y1) and tapped (Y2) density, Carr's compressibility index (Y3, CCI), Kawakita's compaction fitting parameters a (Y4) and 1/b (Y5)), and b) mini-tablet's properties (such as relative density (Y6), average weight (Y7) and weight variation (Y8)). Results showed better flowing properties for pregelatinized starch and improved packing properties for lactose and DPCD. MLR analysis showed high goodness of fit for the Y1, Y2, Y4, Y6 and Y8 with RMSE values of Y1 = 0.028, Y2 = 0.032, Y4 = 0.019, Y6 = 0.015 and Y8 = 0.130; while for rest responses, high correlation was observed from both standard ANNs and GP. PSO-ANNs fitting was the only regression technique that was able to adequately fit all responses simultaneously (RMSE values of Y1 = 0.026, Y2 = 0.022, Y3 = 0.025, Y4 = 0.010, Y5 = 0.063, Y6 = 0.013, Y7 = 0.064 and Y8 = 0.104).
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DoE optimization; Flow properties; Genetic programming; Mini-tablets; Particle swarm optimization ANNs; Quality by design (QbD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30227239     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pharm        ISSN: 0378-5173            Impact factor:   5.875


  5 in total

Review 1.  Application of Artificial Neural Networks in the Process Analytical Technology of Pharmaceutical Manufacturing-a Review.

Authors:  Brigitta Nagy; Dorián László Galata; Attila Farkas; Zsombor Kristóf Nagy
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Comparison of Diagnosis Accuracy between a Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network Model and Linear Regression in Digestive Disease Patients: an Empirical Research.

Authors:  Wei Wei; Xu Yang
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.238

3.  Optimizing Deep Learning Model for Software Cost Estimation Using Hybrid Meta-Heuristic Algorithmic Approach.

Authors:  Ch Anwar Ul Hassan; Muhammad Sufyan Khan; Rizwana Irfan; Jawaid Iqbal; Saddam Hussain; Syed Sajid Ullah; Roobaea Alroobaea; Fazlullah Umar
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-10-04

Review 4.  State-of-the-Art Review of Artificial Neural Networks to Predict, Characterize and Optimize Pharmaceutical Formulation.

Authors:  Shan Wang; Jinwei Di; Dan Wang; Xudong Dai; Yabing Hua; Xiang Gao; Aiping Zheng; Jing Gao
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.321

5.  Implementing the Design of Experiments (DoE) Concept into the Development Phase of Orodispersible Minitablets (ODMTs) Containing Melatonin.

Authors:  Arkadiusz Hejduk; Michał Teżyk; Emilia Jakubowska; Klaudia Krüger; Janina Lulek
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 3.246

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.