Literature DB >> 30226392

Acute chemical skin injuries in the United States: a review.

Alan H Hall1,2, Laurence Mathieu3, Howard I Maibach4.   

Abstract

The objective was to perform a thorough review of published and other available data to elucidate the extent of chemical skin injuries in the US. Chemical skin injuries differ significantly from skin lesions produced by other injury mechanisms, so this review was restricted to the former. Retrieval of relevant published data was performed in PubMed and Google. Other data were retrieved from the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Databank, American Burn Association National Burn Repository, US Department of Labor Bureau of Labor Statistics, websites of all 50 US States Departments of Health, and the National Poison Data System of the American Association of Poison Control Centers. Two areas of significance in disfiguring skin burn injuries and particularly of chemical skin injuries, psychosocial issues and the associated financial burden, have been briefly reviewed. Because of the paucity of published data, international as well as US data have been included. A brief description of an active flushing fluid as an alternative to potable water, Diphoterine® solution, has also been included. Chemical skin injuries generally comprise approximately 2-5% of all skin burns, but sometimes higher percentages have been reported. Data analysis shows that while there are various sources regarding the epidemiology of chemical skin injuries, the total annual number cannot be determined because there is no centralized US national reporting mechanism. Literature and clinical experience demonstrate the importance of chemical skin injuries in USA. Dermal exposures to chemicals can result in mortality and morbidity. Chemical skin injuries can be avoided or ameliorated and preventive advanced measures should be taken to reduce or ameliorate them.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Burns; chemical burns; chemical skin injury; dermal burns; skin burns

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30226392     DOI: 10.1080/10408444.2018.1493085

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  4 in total

Review 1.  Engineering immune-responsive biomaterials for skin regeneration.

Authors:  Pingli Wu; Yangyang Liang; Guoming Sun
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-03-28

2.  Presentations of tetramethylammonium hydroxide dermal exposure and the valuable potential of diphoterine solution in decontamination: a retrospective observational study.

Authors:  Chih-Kang Huang; Alan H Hall; Ming-Ling Wu; Chen-Chang Yang; Dong-Zong Hung; Yan-Chiao Mao; Jou-Fang Deng
Journal:  BMC Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2020-11-30       Impact factor: 2.483

3.  Biocompatible Chitosan-Based Hydrogels for Bioabsorbable Wound Dressings.

Authors:  Ramona Lungu; Maria-Alexandra Paun; Dragos Peptanariu; Daniela Ailincai; Luminita Marin; Mihai-Virgil Nichita; Vladimir-Alexandru Paun; Viorel-Puiu Paun
Journal:  Gels       Date:  2022-02-10

Review 4.  Marine Collagen: A Promising Biomaterial for Wound Healing, Skin Anti-Aging, and Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Sarah Geahchan; Parnian Baharlouei; Azizur Rahman
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 5.118

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.