Archana Asundi1, Maggie Stanislawski2, Payal Mehta3, Anna E Barón2, Howard Gold4, Hillary Mull5, P Michael Ho2, Kalpana Gupta3, Westyn Branch-Elliman3. 1. 1Division of Infectious Diseases,Boston Medical Center,Boston,Massachusetts. 2. 2Seattle-Denver Center of Innovation for Veteran-Centered and Value-Driven Care,Seattle,Washington and Denver,Colorado. 3. 4Department of Medicine,Division of Infectious Diseases,Boston VA Healthcare System,West Roxbury,Massachusetts. 4. 6Department of Medicine,Division of Infectious Disease,Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center,Boston,Massachusetts. 5. 8Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR),VA Boston Healthcare System,Boston,Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The rate of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is increasing coincident with an increase in the number of device procedures. Preprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces CIED infections; however, there is no evidence that prolonged postprocedural antimicrobials additionally reduce risk. Thus, we sought to quantify the harms associated with this approach. OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), acute kidney injury (AKI) and receipt of prolonged postprocedural antimicrobials. METHODS: CIED procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Electrophysiology (CART-EP) database during fiscal years 2008-2016 were included. The primary outcome was 90-day incidence of CDI and the secondary outcome was the 7-day incidence of AKI. The primary exposure measure was duration of postprocedural antimicrobial therapy. Associations were measured using Cox-proportional hazards and binomial regression. RESULTS: Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial therapy was identified following 3,331 of 6,497 CIED procedures (51.3%), and the median duration of prophylaxis was 5 days. Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial use was associated with increased risk of CDI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-5.46). Of the 27 patients who developed CDI, 11 subsequently died. Postprocedural antimicrobial use with ≥2 antimicrobials was associated with an increased risk of AKI (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.50-6.90). The impact was particularly significant when one of the dual agents prescribed was vancomycin (adjusted OR, 8.41; 95% CI, 5.53-12.79). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis following CIED procedures increases preventable harm; this practice should be discouraged in procedural settings such as the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory.
BACKGROUND: The rate of cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infection is increasing coincident with an increase in the number of device procedures. Preprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis reduces CIED infections; however, there is no evidence that prolonged postprocedural antimicrobials additionally reduce risk. Thus, we sought to quantify the harms associated with this approach. OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between Clostridium difficileinfection (CDI), acute kidney injury (AKI) and receipt of prolonged postprocedural antimicrobials. METHODS: CIED procedures entered into the VA Clinical Assessment Reporting and Tracking Electrophysiology (CART-EP) database during fiscal years 2008-2016 were included. The primary outcome was 90-day incidence of CDI and the secondary outcome was the 7-day incidence of AKI. The primary exposure measure was duration of postprocedural antimicrobial therapy. Associations were measured using Cox-proportional hazards and binomial regression. RESULTS: Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial therapy was identified following 3,331 of 6,497 CIED procedures (51.3%), and the median duration of prophylaxis was 5 days. Prolonged postprocedural antimicrobial use was associated with increased risk of CDI (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54-5.46). Of the 27 patients who developed CDI, 11 subsequently died. Postprocedural antimicrobial use with ≥2 antimicrobials was associated with an increased risk of AKI (OR, 4.16; 95% CI, 2.50-6.90). The impact was particularly significant when one of the dual agents prescribed was vancomycin (adjusted OR, 8.41; 95% CI, 5.53-12.79). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged antimicrobial prophylaxis following CIED procedures increases preventable harm; this practice should be discouraged in procedural settings such as the cardiac electrophysiology laboratory.
Authors: Yves Longtin; Philippe Gervais; David H Birnie; Jia Wang; Marco Alings; François Philippon; Ratika Parkash; Jaimie Manlucu; Paul Angaran; Claus Rinne; Benoit Coutu; R Aaron Low; Vidal Essebag; Carlos Morillo; Damian Redfearn; Satish Toal; Giuliano Becker; Michel Degrâce; Bernard Thibault; Eugene Crystal; Stanley Tung; John LeMaitre; Omar Sultan; Matthew Bennett; Jamil Bashir; Felix Ayala-Paredes; Leon Rioux; Martin E W Hemels; Leon H R Bouwels; Derek V Exner; Paul Dorian; Stuart J Connolly; Andrew D Krahn Journal: Open Forum Infect Dis Date: 2021-10-14 Impact factor: 3.835
Authors: Hillary J Mull; Kelly L Stolzmann; Marlena H Shin; Emily Kalver; Marin L Schweizer; Westyn Branch-Elliman Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-09-01