Literature DB >> 30225873

FIGO postpartum intrauterine device initiative: Complication rates across six countries.

Anita Makins1,2, Neda Taghinejadi2, Maya Sethi1, Kazuyo Machiyama3, Projestine Munganyizi4, Elly Odongo5, Hema Divakar6, Parveen Fatima7, Kusum Thapa8, Gamini Perera9, Sabaratnam Arulkumaran1,10.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To record and analyze complication rates following postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) insertion in 48 hospitals in six countries: Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Tanzania, and Kenya.
METHODS: Healthcare providers were trained in counselling and insertion of PPIUD via a training-the-trainer model. Data were collected on methodology, timing, cadre of staff providing care, and number of insertions. Data on complications were collected at 6-week follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed to elucidate factors associated with increased expulsion and absence of threads.
RESULTS: From May 2014 to September 2017, 36 766 PPIUDs were inserted: 53% vaginal and 47% at cesarean delivery; 74% were inserted by doctors. Follow-up was attended by 52%. Expulsion and removal rates were 2.5% and 3.6%, respectively. Threads were not visible in 29%. Expulsion was less likely after cesarean insertion (aOR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.26-0.41), following vaginal insertion at between 10 minutes and 48 hours (aOR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.42-0.83), and when insertion was performed by a nurse (aOR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.22-0.50).
CONCLUSION: PPIUD has low complication rates and can be safely inserted by a variety of trained health staff. Given the immediate benefit of the one-stop approach, governments should urgently consider adopting this model.
© 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PPIUD ; Absent thread; Complications; Expulsions; FIGO initiative; Outcomes; Postpartum intrauterine device; Removal

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225873     DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.12600

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet        ISSN: 0020-7292            Impact factor:   3.561


  6 in total

1.  Single center experience on implementation of the postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) in Sri Lanka: a retrospective study.

Authors:  D L W Dasanayake; M Patabendige; Y Amarasinghe
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2020-04-10

2.  Economic Evaluation of Provision of Postpartum Intrauterine Device Services in Bangladesh and Tanzania.

Authors:  Gillian Eva; Judy Gold; Anita Makins; Suzanna Bright; Katherine Dean; Emily-Anne Tunnacliffe; Parveen Fatima; Afroja Yesmin; Projestine Muganyizi; Grasiana F Kimario; Kim Dalziel
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2021-03-31

3.  A non-inferiority analysis of hemoglobin levels in postpartum IUD users in Bangladesh.

Authors:  Suzanna Bright; Georgia R Gore-Langton; Parveen Fatima; Farhana Dewan; Afroja Yesmin; Anita Makins
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2022-03-06       Impact factor: 4.447

4.  Provision of immediate postpartum intrauterine contraception after vaginal birth within a public maternity setting: Health services research evaluation.

Authors:  Michelle Cooper; Kevin McGeechan; Anna Glasier; Shiona Coutts; Frances McGuire; Jeni Harden; Nicola Boydell; Sharon T Cameron
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2019-12-29       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  A one-year cohort study of complications, continuation, and failure rates of postpartum TCu380A in Tanzania.

Authors:  France John Rwegoshora; Projestine Selestine Muganyizi; Grasiana Festus Kimario; Ponsian Patrick Paul; Anita Makins
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.223

6.  The negative impact of COVID-19 on contraception and sexual and reproductive health: Could immediate postpartum LARCs be the solution?

Authors:  Anita Makins; Sabaratnam Arulkumaran
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 4.447

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.