Ralf Lützkendorf1, Robin M Heidemann2, Thorsten Feiweier2, Michael Luchtmann3, Sebastian Baecke4, Jörn Kaufmann5, Jörg Stadler6, Eike Budinger6,7, Johannes Bernarding4,7. 1. Institute for Biometry and Medical Informatics, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany. ralf.luetzkendorf@med.ovgu.de. 2. Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen, Germany. 3. Department of Neurosurgery, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany. 4. Institute for Biometry and Medical Informatics, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany. 5. Department of Neurology, Otto-von-Guericke-University, Magdeburg, Germany. 6. Leibniz Institute for Neurobiology, Magdeburg, Germany. 7. Center of Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the use of high-resolution ultra-high-field diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) to determine neuronal fiber orientation density functions (fODFs) throughout the human brain, including gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and small intertwined structures in the cerebellopontine region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired 7-T whole-brain dMRI data of 23 volunteers with 1.4-mm isotropic resolution; fODFs were estimated using constrained spherical deconvolution. RESULTS: High-resolution fODFs enabled a detailed view of the intravoxel distributions of fiber populations in the whole brain. In the brainstem region, the fODF of the extra- and intrapontine parts of the trigeminus could be resolved. Intrapontine trigeminal fiber populations were crossed in a network-like fashion by fiber populations of the surrounding cerebellopontine tracts. In cortical GM, additional evidence was found that in parts of primary somatosensory cortex, fODFs seem to be oriented less perpendicular to the cortical surface than in GM of motor, premotor, and secondary somatosensory cortices. CONCLUSION: With 7-T MRI being introduced into clinical routine, high-resolution dMRI and derived measures such as fODFs can serve to characterize fine-scale anatomic structures as a prerequisite to detecting pathologies in GM and small or intertwined WM tracts.
OBJECTIVES: We assessed the use of high-resolution ultra-high-field diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) to determine neuronal fiber orientation density functions (fODFs) throughout the human brain, including gray matter (GM), white matter (WM), and small intertwined structures in the cerebellopontine region. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We acquired 7-T whole-brain dMRI data of 23 volunteers with 1.4-mm isotropic resolution; fODFs were estimated using constrained spherical deconvolution. RESULTS: High-resolution fODFs enabled a detailed view of the intravoxel distributions of fiber populations in the whole brain. In the brainstem region, the fODF of the extra- and intrapontine parts of the trigeminus could be resolved. Intrapontine trigeminal fiber populations were crossed in a network-like fashion by fiber populations of the surrounding cerebellopontine tracts. In cortical GM, additional evidence was found that in parts of primary somatosensory cortex, fODFs seem to be oriented less perpendicular to the cortical surface than in GM of motor, premotor, and secondary somatosensory cortices. CONCLUSION: With 7-T MRI being introduced into clinical routine, high-resolution dMRI and derived measures such as fODFs can serve to characterize fine-scale anatomic structures as a prerequisite to detecting pathologies in GM and small or intertwined WM tracts.
Authors: Robin M Heidemann; Dimo Ivanov; Robert Trampel; Fabrizio Fasano; Heiko Meyer; Josef Pfeuffer; Robert Turner Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-01-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Lindsay Walker; Lin-Ching Chang; Amritha Nayak; M Okan Irfanoglu; Kelly N Botteron; James McCracken; Robert C McKinstry; Michael J Rivkin; Dah-Jyuu Wang; Judith Rumsey; Carlo Pierpaoli Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-06-03 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Michiel Kleinnijenhuis; Tim van Mourik; David G Norris; Dirk J Ruiter; Anne-Marie van Cappellen van Walsum; Markus Barth Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2015-01-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: M E Moseley; Y Cohen; J Kucharczyk; J Mintorovitch; H S Asgari; M F Wendland; J Tsuruda; D Norman Journal: Radiology Date: 1990-08 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Van J Wedeen; Douglas L Rosene; Ruopeng Wang; Guangping Dai; Farzad Mortazavi; Patric Hagmann; Jon H Kaas; Wen-Yih I Tseng Journal: Science Date: 2012-03-30 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: David C Van Essen; Stephen M Smith; Deanna M Barch; Timothy E J Behrens; Essa Yacoub; Kamil Ugurbil Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Mark Jenkinson; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Mark W Woolrich; Stephen M Smith Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2011-09-16 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jose Guerrero-Gonzalez; Olivia Surgent; Nagesh Adluru; Gregory R Kirk; Douglas C Dean Iii; Steven R Kecskemeti; Andrew L Alexander; Brittany G Travers Journal: Front Integr Neurosci Date: 2022-03-03
Authors: Zsolt Turi; Nicholas Hananeia; Sina Shirinpour; Alexander Opitz; Peter Jedlicka; Andreas Vlachos Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2022-07-08 Impact factor: 5.152