Literature DB >> 30225743

Lateral thermal spread and recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after minimally invasive esophagectomy in bipolar vessel sealing and ultrasonic energy devices: a comparative study.

Kazuo Koyanagi1, Fumihiko Kato2, Keita Nakanishi2, Soji Ozawa3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the extent of lateral thermal spread of surrounding tissues after the use of advanced bipolar and ultrasonic coagulation and shearing devices. Association between recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis (RLNP) and such devices was assessed in patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE).
METHODS: LigaSure™ (LS) and Sonicision™ (SONIC) were used. In ex vivo experiments using the porcine muscle, blade temperature and tissue temperature were measured using a thermometer after the activation of both devices. For the clinical assessment, 46 consecutive patients who received MIE were retrospectively assessed.
RESULTS: The temperature generated at the blade of both devices increased with the activation time. The blade temperature of LS was significantly lower than that of SONIC (P < 0.001). The blade temperature of SONIC exceeded 100 °C after 3-s activation. The temperature of surrounding tissues after a single activation of the devices decreased with the tissue distance from activation blade. The temperatures of tissues at 1 and 2 mm away from the blade side of LS were significantly lower than those of SONIC (P = 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The temperature of tissue 2 mm away from the blade side of LS increased 6.4 °C from the baseline temperature. Furthermore, the incidence of RLNP in the LS group was lower than that in the SONIC group (P = 0.044).
CONCLUSION: This study highlights the necessity of spatial and temporal recognition of the thermal spread of coagulation and shearing devices to reduce the thermal injuries following MIE.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coagulation and shearing devices; Esophageal cancer; Lateral thermal injury; Minimally invasive esophagectomy; Recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225743     DOI: 10.1007/s10388-018-0621-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Esophagus        ISSN: 1612-9059            Impact factor:   4.230


  18 in total

1.  How safe is high-power ultrasonic dissection?

Authors:  Tarek A Emam; Alfred Cuschieri
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Real-time thermography during energized vessel sealing and dissection.

Authors:  P A Campbell; A B Cresswell; T G Frank; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Effectiveness of electrothermal bipolar vessel-sealing devices versus other electrothermal and ultrasonic devices for abdominal surgical hemostasis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Petra F Janssen; Hans A M Brölmann; Judith A F Huirne
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Comparison of monopolar electrocoagulation, bipolar electrocoagulation, Ultracision, and Ligasure.

Authors:  Theodore Diamantis; Michael Kontos; Antonios Arvelakis; Spiridon Syroukis; Dimitris Koronarchis; Apostolos Papalois; Emmanuel Agapitos; Elias Bastounis; Andreas C Lazaris
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.549

5.  High risk of unilateral recurrent laryngeal nerve paralysis after esophagectomy using cervical anastomosis.

Authors:  L Pertl; J Zacherl; G Mancusi; J N Gächter; R Asari; S Schoppmann; W Bigenzahn; B Schneider-Stickler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-06-25       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Prospective comparison of four laparoscopic vessel ligation devices.

Authors:  Gregory R Lamberton; Ryan S Hsi; Daniel H Jin; Tekisha U Lindler; Forrest C Jellison; D Duane Baldwin
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.942

7.  Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis after Esophagectomy: Respiratory Complications and Role of Nerve Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kazuo Koyanagi; Hiroyasu Igaki; Jun Iwabu; Hiroki Ochiai; Yuji Tachimori
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.848

8.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position improves postoperative outcomes: role of C-reactive protein as an indicator of surgical invasiveness.

Authors:  Kazuo Koyanagi; Soji Ozawa; Yuji Tachimori
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 4.230

10.  A comparison of video-assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation.

Authors:  H Osugi; M Takemura; M Higashino; N Takada; S Lee; H Kinoshita
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  2 in total

1.  Modification of the Thermal Spread by the Blade Shape of an Ultrasonically Activated Device.

Authors:  Shuhei Kajiwara; Hirokazu Noshiro; Hiroshi Kitagawa; Tomokazu Tanaka; Keita Kai
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-17       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Detection of the Lateral Thermal Spread during Bipolar Vessel Sealing in an Ex Vivo Model-Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Andreas Kirschbaum; Jan Jonas; Thomas M Surowiec; Anika Pehl; Nikolas Mirow
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.