| Literature DB >> 30225287 |
Elham AlSadat Heidari1, Hosein Alidadi2,1, Ali Asghar Najafpoor2,1, Seyed Mohsen Mohseni3, Aliakbar Dehghan2,1, Ali Sheibani1, Maryam Sarkhosh2,1.
Abstract
Data on the chemical, physical and biological of effluent from wastewater treatment are provided in table format in the current article. Samples were taken in Peak Flows at effluent Treatment Plants. Sampling and tests were conducted according to the standards methods. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS software and excel program. Nickel metal showed higher amounts than the standards required for irrigation agricultural land. Data could be useful from environmental and agricultural sciences to those concerned about heavy metals, Alkalinity, EC, COD, BOD5 and Microbial concentrations threats.Entities:
Keywords: Effluent; Heavy metals; Influent; Irrigation; Standard
Year: 2018 PMID: 30225287 PMCID: PMC6139534 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.086
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Characteristics wastewater treatment effluent and influent.
| – | 7.6±0.5 | 7.8±0.2 | 6.5–8.5 | 6.5–8.4 | |
| mg/L | 1.1±0.4 | 2.5±0.6 | 2 | 2 | |
| mg CaCO3/L | 235±24 | 150±15 | |||
| mg/L | 115±18 | 38±3 | 40 | 100 | |
| ds/m | 0.13±0.02 | 0.113±0.009 | – | 2.97 | |
| mg/L | 304.5±18.7 | 58.1±6.2 | 60 | 200 | |
| mg/L | 121.6±27.6 | 24.3±3.7 | 30 | 100 |
Heavy metals concentration in wastewater treatment effluent and compare with different standards.
| µg/L | 184±96 | 2000 | 200 | 200 | |
| µg/L | 402±80 | 1000 | 5000 | 5000 | |
| µg/L | 50±62 | 200 | 200 | 200 | |
| µg/L | 98±12 | 1000 | 100 | 100 |
Fig. 1The average concentrations of each heavy metal in each sampling month.
Microbial concentrations in wastewater treatment effluent.
| MPN/100 mL | 310±55 | 1000 | 1000 | |
| MPN/100 mL | 1320±37 | 400 | 400 | |
| Number/L | 0 | – | 1> |
Fig. 2Location of wastewater treatment plant.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | Pollutants in effluents |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |