Literature DB >> 30225121

Mol-ecular and crystal structure of methyl 4-methyl-2,2-dioxo-1H-2λ6,1-benzo-thia-zine-3-carboxyl-ate.

Svitlana Shishkina1,2, Igor Ukrainets3, Ganna Hamza3, Lina Grinevich3.   

Abstract

The title compound, C11H11NO4S, possesses weak analgesic properties and is a source compound for the synthesis of highly active analgesic and anti-inflammatory compounds. The benzo-thia-zine ring adopts a conformation intermediate between twist-boat and sofa. The ester substituent is turned towards the endocyclic double bond because of steric repulsion. In the crystal, the mol-ecules form columns along the [001] direction, bound by N-H⋯O hydrogen bonds and stacking inter-actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  1,2-benzo­thia­zine derivatives; hydrogen bonding; mol­ecular and crystal structure; π-stacking inter­action

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225121      PMCID: PMC6127716          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Methyl 4-methyl-2,2-dioxo-1H-2λ6,1-benzo­thia­zine-3-carb­oxyl­ate (I) displays moderate analgesic properties (Azotla-Cruz et al., 2017 ▸) but has been used for the synthesis of highly active analgesic and anti-inflammatory compounds (Ukrainets et al., 2018 ▸). Earlier it was shown (Ukrainets et al., 2016a ▸,b ▸) that the biological properties of 2,1-benzo­thia­zine derivatives depend to a considerable degree on their mol­ecular and crystal structures. Thus knowledge of both the mol­ecular and crystal structures of I is very important.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of the title compound is shown in Fig. 1 ▸. The di­hydro­thia­zine heterocycle adopts a twist-boat conformation with puckering parameters (Zefirov et al., 1990 ▸) S = 0.57, Θ = 53.3°, Ψ = 25.2°. The S1 and C8 atoms deviate from the mean plane of the remaining ring atoms by 0.7941 (6) and 0.260 (2) Å, respectively. Some steric repulsion between the methyl substituent at the C7 atom and the ester group [the short intra­molecular contact C11⋯O1 is 2.986 (5) Å compared to the van der Waals radii sum of 3.00 Å (Zefirov, 1997 ▸)] is compensated for by the formation of the intra­molecular C11—H11C⋯O1 hydrogen bond (Table 1 ▸). As a result, the ester substituent is turned relative to the C7=C8 endocyclic double bond [C7=C8—C9—O1 torsion angle is −35.2 (5)°] and the C7=C8 [1.359 (4) Å] and C8—C9 [1.504 (3) Å] bonds are elongated compared to the standard values (Bürgi & Dunitz, 1994 ▸) of 1.326 and 1.455 Å, respect­ively. The methyl group of the ester substituent is in an anti-periplanar conformation relative to the C8—C9 bond [C8—C9—O2—C10 = 174.5 (2)°].
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of I with the atom labelling. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 50% probability level.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C11—H11C⋯O10.962.242.986 (5)133
N1—H1N⋯O4i 0.81 (4)2.09 (4)2.891 (3)170 (4)
C4—H4⋯O3ii 0.932.553.427 (3)158

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

Supra­molecular features

In the crystal, mol­ecules of I form columns along the [001] direction (Fig. 2 ▸). Neighboring mol­ecules within the column are linked by the N1—H1N⋯O4i hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸) and π-stacking inter­actions with centroid–centroid diatances of 3.870 (2) Å. The columns are connected by weak C4—H4⋯O3ii hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸).
Figure 2

The packing showing columns of mol­ecules along the c-axis direction.

Database survey

An search of the Cambridge Structural Database (Version 5.39, update February 2018; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) revealed only three similar 1,2-benzo­thia­zine derivatives with a methyl substituent at the C7 atom (VAZQEV and VAZQIZ, Azotla-Cruz et al., 2017 ▸; OWUQII, Azotla-Cruz et al., 2016 ▸). All of these compounds are substituted at the nitro­gen atom and have very similar mol­ecular structures. The structure VAZQEV differs from others by the trans-orientation of the carbonyl group of the ester substituent relative to the endocyclic double bond.

Synthesis and crystallization

Methyl (chloro­sulfon­yl)acetate (1.90 g, 0.011 mol) was added dropwise with stirring to a solution of ortho-amino­aceto­phenone (1.35 g, 0.010 mol) and tri­ethyl­amine (1.54 mL, 0.011 mol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) and cooled to 268–273 K. After 10 h, water (50 mL) was added to the reaction mixture, which was then acidified to pH 4 with 1 N HCl and mixed thoroughly. The organic layer was separated off, dried over anhydrous CaCl2, and the solvent distilled (at reduced pressure at the end). The resulting anilide was subjected to heterocyclization without purification. A solution of sodium methyl­ate in anhydrous methanol [from metallic sodium (0.69 g, 0.030 mol) and absolute methanol (15 mL)], the mixture was boiled and then kept for 15 h at room temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with cold water and acidified with 1 N HCl to pH 4. Finally, the solid ester, I, was separated by filtration, washed with water, and dried in air giving colourless block-shaped crystals, yield: 2.25 g (89%); m.p. 476–578 K (methanol); R f = 0.37. 1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ 11.84 (br s, 1H, NH), 7.79 (d, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, H-5), 7.49 (t, 1H, J = 7.2 Hz, H-7), 7.22 (t, 1H, J = 7.6 Hz, H-6), 7.12 (d, 1H, J = 8.0 Hz, H-8), 3.84 (s, 3H, OCH3), 2.46 (s, 3H, 4-CH3, coincides with the signal of residual protons DMSO-d 6). 13C-NMR (100 MHz, DMSO-d 6 + CDCl3): δ 161.6 (C=O), 147.7, 138.2, 132.2, 127.4, 127.1, 123.0, 121.3, 118.8, 52.9 (OCH3), 17.5 (4-CH3). MS (m/z, %): 253 [M]+ (4.4), 252 [M − H]+ (1.5), 221 [M − CH3OH]+ (8.4), 195 (80.2), 119 (75.3), 103 (17.0), 93 (100), 92 (59.5), 77 (50.0). Analysis calculated for C11H11NO4S: C, 52.16; H, 4.38; N, 5.53; S 12.66%. Found: C, 52.07; H, 4.30; N, 5.46; S 12.72%.

Refinement

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 2 ▸. All of the H atoms were located in difference-Fourier maps. The N-bound H atoms were refined isotropically. The C-bound H atoms were included in calculated positions and treated as riding: C—H = 0.96 Å with U iso(H) =1.5U eq(C) for the methyl groups and C—H = 0.93 Å with U iso(H) = 1.2Ueq(C) for all others.
Table 2

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC11H11NO4S
M r 253.27
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)7.8367 (3), 9.6842 (4), 7.5006 (4)
β (°)93.468 (4)
V3)568.19 (4)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.29
Crystal size (mm)0.21 × 0.18 × 0.15
 
Data collection
DiffractometerAgilent Xcalibur Sapphire3
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (CrysAlis RED; Agilent, 2012)
T min, T max 0.809, 1.000
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections5509, 3068, 2803
R int 0.026
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.703
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.035, 0.085, 1.04
No. of reflections3068
No. of parameters160
No. of restraints2
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.19, −0.21
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1127 quotients [(I +)−(I )]/[(I +)+(I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.04 (5)

Computer programs: CrysAlis CCD and CrysAlis RED (Agilent, 2012 ▸), SHELXS2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014/7 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸) and Mercury (Macrae et al., 2008 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011362/zp2032sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011362/zp2032Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011362/zp2032Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1861156 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C11H11NO4SF(000) = 264
Mr = 253.27Dx = 1.480 Mg m3
Monoclinic, PcMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.8367 (3) ÅCell parameters from 2089 reflections
b = 9.6842 (4) Åθ = 4.2–30.6°
c = 7.5006 (4) ŵ = 0.29 mm1
β = 93.468 (4)°T = 293 K
V = 568.19 (4) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 20.21 × 0.18 × 0.15 mm
Agilent Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer3068 independent reflections
Radiation source: Enhance (Mo) X-ray Source2803 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 16.1827 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.026
ω–scansθmax = 30.0°, θmin = 3.4°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis RED; Agilent, 2012)h = −10→11
Tmin = 0.809, Tmax = 1.000k = −9→13
5509 measured reflectionsl = −10→10
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.035H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.085w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0399P)2] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.04(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3068 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.19 e Å3
160 parametersΔρmin = −0.21 e Å3
2 restraintsAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1127 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.04 (5)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
S10.82278 (8)0.16925 (5)0.52933 (8)0.03401 (14)
O10.6143 (4)0.5195 (2)0.4202 (4)0.0679 (7)
O20.8581 (3)0.4555 (2)0.5668 (3)0.0514 (5)
O30.9468 (3)0.2019 (2)0.4041 (3)0.0477 (5)
O40.8846 (2)0.15240 (18)0.7126 (2)0.0416 (4)
N10.7250 (3)0.0322 (2)0.4558 (3)0.0420 (5)
H1N0.780 (5)−0.012 (4)0.388 (5)0.064 (11)*
C10.5686 (3)−0.0083 (2)0.5189 (3)0.0364 (5)
C20.5276 (4)−0.1480 (3)0.5226 (4)0.0459 (6)
H20.6049−0.21360.48640.055*
C30.3720 (5)−0.1882 (3)0.5802 (4)0.0558 (8)
H30.3433−0.28140.58140.067*
C40.2584 (4)−0.0915 (4)0.6361 (4)0.0570 (8)
H40.1550−0.11980.67860.068*
C50.2967 (4)0.0469 (3)0.6297 (4)0.0469 (6)
H50.21740.11120.66520.056*
C60.4538 (3)0.0927 (3)0.5705 (3)0.0374 (5)
C70.4909 (3)0.2408 (3)0.5508 (3)0.0384 (5)
C80.6512 (3)0.2858 (3)0.5222 (3)0.0365 (5)
C90.7020 (4)0.4337 (3)0.4961 (4)0.0431 (6)
C100.9327 (5)0.5898 (3)0.5392 (5)0.0634 (9)
H10A1.04620.59240.59490.095*
H10B0.86400.65950.59080.095*
H10C0.93750.60660.41340.095*
C110.3470 (5)0.3403 (3)0.5685 (6)0.0599 (10)
H11A0.30550.33310.68600.090*
H11B0.25620.31920.48110.090*
H11C0.38690.43260.54980.090*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
S10.0300 (3)0.0345 (2)0.0379 (3)0.0013 (2)0.0052 (2)0.0017 (2)
O10.0679 (16)0.0430 (11)0.0907 (18)0.0062 (10)−0.0134 (14)0.0153 (11)
O20.0499 (13)0.0386 (9)0.0646 (14)−0.0088 (9)−0.0041 (10)0.0034 (8)
O30.0423 (11)0.0504 (11)0.0519 (12)0.0000 (9)0.0161 (9)0.0048 (9)
O40.0372 (10)0.0453 (10)0.0421 (11)−0.0009 (7)−0.0014 (8)0.0061 (7)
N10.0383 (12)0.0385 (11)0.0505 (13)−0.0010 (9)0.0116 (10)−0.0106 (9)
C10.0333 (12)0.0388 (12)0.0367 (13)−0.0032 (10)0.0000 (10)−0.0034 (9)
C20.0472 (16)0.0391 (13)0.0508 (16)−0.0035 (11)−0.0007 (13)0.0006 (11)
C30.059 (2)0.0488 (16)0.059 (2)−0.0186 (14)0.0022 (15)0.0046 (12)
C40.0461 (17)0.072 (2)0.0530 (17)−0.0189 (15)0.0062 (13)0.0059 (15)
C50.0349 (13)0.0617 (17)0.0444 (15)−0.0021 (12)0.0040 (12)−0.0013 (12)
C60.0323 (12)0.0426 (13)0.0369 (12)0.0005 (10)−0.0004 (9)−0.0029 (9)
C70.0328 (12)0.0405 (13)0.0416 (13)0.0036 (10)−0.0010 (10)−0.0047 (10)
C80.0370 (13)0.0343 (11)0.0383 (13)0.0052 (9)0.0010 (10)−0.0012 (9)
C90.0474 (15)0.0347 (12)0.0469 (16)0.0045 (11)−0.0004 (13)−0.0027 (10)
C100.069 (2)0.0425 (17)0.078 (2)−0.0173 (15)0.0017 (18)−0.0029 (15)
C110.0372 (17)0.0518 (15)0.091 (3)0.0120 (13)0.0055 (18)−0.0072 (15)
S1—O31.4271 (19)C1—C61.400 (3)
S1—O41.4391 (19)C2—C31.375 (5)
S1—N11.613 (2)C3—C41.375 (5)
S1—C81.754 (3)C4—C51.375 (4)
O1—C91.199 (4)C5—C61.406 (4)
O2—C91.321 (4)C6—C71.472 (4)
O2—C101.446 (4)C7—C81.359 (4)
N1—C11.397 (3)C7—C111.496 (4)
C1—C21.391 (3)C8—C91.503 (4)
O3—S1—O4116.79 (13)C4—C5—C6121.1 (3)
O3—S1—N1106.58 (13)C1—C6—C5117.2 (2)
O4—S1—N1111.04 (12)C1—C6—C7121.3 (2)
O3—S1—C8112.85 (12)C5—C6—C7121.4 (3)
O4—S1—C8108.38 (12)C8—C7—C6121.2 (2)
N1—S1—C899.88 (13)C8—C7—C11121.1 (3)
C9—O2—C10117.3 (2)C6—C7—C11117.7 (2)
C1—N1—S1121.58 (18)C7—C8—C9125.5 (2)
C2—C1—N1119.2 (2)C7—C8—S1120.2 (2)
C2—C1—C6121.4 (2)C9—C8—S1114.1 (2)
N1—C1—C6119.3 (2)O1—C9—O2124.7 (3)
C3—C2—C1119.5 (3)O1—C9—C8125.0 (3)
C2—C3—C4120.4 (3)O2—C9—C8110.3 (2)
C5—C4—C3120.5 (3)
O3—S1—N1—C1−163.3 (2)C1—C6—C7—C11166.1 (3)
O4—S1—N1—C168.5 (2)C5—C6—C7—C11−9.2 (4)
C8—S1—N1—C1−45.7 (2)C6—C7—C8—C9178.5 (2)
S1—N1—C1—C2−149.9 (2)C11—C7—C8—C9−3.3 (4)
S1—N1—C1—C632.6 (3)C6—C7—C8—S1−6.1 (3)
N1—C1—C2—C3−178.3 (3)C11—C7—C8—S1172.1 (2)
C6—C1—C2—C3−0.8 (4)O3—S1—C8—C7145.0 (2)
C1—C2—C3—C4−0.9 (5)O4—S1—C8—C7−84.1 (2)
C2—C3—C4—C52.1 (5)N1—S1—C8—C732.2 (2)
C3—C4—C5—C6−1.6 (4)O3—S1—C8—C9−39.2 (2)
C2—C1—C6—C51.3 (4)O4—S1—C8—C991.8 (2)
N1—C1—C6—C5178.8 (2)N1—S1—C8—C9−151.97 (19)
C2—C1—C6—C7−174.3 (2)C10—O2—C9—O1−4.8 (5)
N1—C1—C6—C73.2 (4)C10—O2—C9—C8174.5 (2)
C4—C5—C6—C1−0.1 (4)C7—C8—C9—O1−35.2 (5)
C4—C5—C6—C7175.5 (2)S1—C8—C9—O1149.2 (3)
C1—C6—C7—C8−15.6 (4)C7—C8—C9—O2145.5 (3)
C5—C6—C7—C8169.1 (3)S1—C8—C9—O2−30.1 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C11—H11C···O10.962.242.986 (5)133
N1—H1N···O4i0.81 (4)2.09 (4)2.891 (3)170 (4)
C4—H4···O3ii0.932.553.427 (3)158
  6 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Two pseudo-enantiomeric forms of N-benzyl-4-hydroxy-1-methyl-2,2-dioxo-1H-2λ(6),1-benzothiazine-3-carboxamide and their analgesic properties.

Authors:  Igor V Ukrainets; Svitlana V Shishkina; Vyacheslav N Baumer; Olga V Gorokhova; Lidiya A Petrushova; Galina Sim
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 1.172

3.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

4.  Synthesis, Spatial Structure and Analgesic Activity of Sodium 3-Benzylaminocarbonyl-1-methyl-2,2-dioxo-1H-2λ⁶,1-benzothiazin-4-olate Solvates.

Authors:  Igor V Ukrainets; Lidiya A Petrushova; Svitlana V Shishkina; Lina A Grinevich; Galina Sim
Journal:  Sci Pharm       Date:  2016-10-19

5.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17

6.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.