Literature DB >> 30225119

Crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis of (E)-5-phenyl-3-[(pyridin-4-yl-methyl-idene)amino]-thia-zolidin-2-iminium bromide monohydrate.

Mehmet Akkurt1, Abel M Maharramov2, Gulnara Sh Duruskari2, Flavien A A Toze3, Ali N Khalilov2.   

Abstract

In the cation of the title salt, C15H15N4S+·Br-·H2O, the central thia-zolidine ring adopts an envelope conformation with puckering parameters Q(2) = 0.279 (4) Å and φ(2) = 222.5 (9)°. The mean plane of the thia-zolidine ring makes dihedral angles of 12.4 (2) and 66.8 (3)° with the pyridine and phenyl rings, respectively. The pyridine ring in the title mol-ecule is essentially planar (r.m.s deviation = 0.005 Å). In the crystal, the cations, anions and water mol-ecules are linked into a three-dimensional network, which forms cross layers parallel to the (120) and (20) planes via O-H⋯Br, N-H⋯Br and N-H⋯N hydrogen bonds. C-H⋯π inter-actions also help in the stabilization of the mol-ecular packing. Hirshfeld surface analysis and 2D (two-dimensional) fingerprint plots indicate that the most important contributions to the crystal packing are from H⋯H (35.5%), C⋯H/H⋯C (23.9%), Br⋯H/H⋯Br (16.4%), N⋯H/H⋯N (10.6%) and S⋯H/H⋯S (7.9%) inter-actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; charge-assisted hydrogen bonding; crystal structure; pyridine ring; thia­zolidine ring

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225119      PMCID: PMC6127695          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011155

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Schiff bases and related hydrazone compounds play an important role in coordination and medicinal chemistry due to their high coordination ability (Mahmoudi et al., 2017a ▸,b ▸,c ▸; Mitoraj et al., 2018 ▸; Shixaliyev et al., 2013a ▸), application of those metal complexes in catalysis (Jlassi et al., 2014 ▸; Gurbanov et al., 2018 ▸; Mahmudov et al., 2014 ▸; Shixaliyev et al., 2013b ▸, 2014 ▸), biological properties (Abedi et al., 2014 ▸), etc. Inter- and intra­molecular weak inter­actions may also effect their properties (Mahmudov et al., 2016 ▸, 2017a ▸,b ▸). Herein we found strong O—H⋯Br− and N+—H⋯Br− types of charge-assisted hydrogen bonds in (E)-5-phenyl-3-[(pyridin-4-yl­methylid­ene)amino]­thia­zolidin-2-iminium bromide monohy­drate.

Structural commentary

The thia­zolidine ring (atoms S1/C1–C4) in the cation of the title salt (Fig. 1 ▸) adopts an envelope conformation with the puckering parameters (Cremer & Pople, 1975 ▸) Q(2) = 0.279 (4) Å and φ(2) = 222.5 (9)°. The mean plane of the thia­zolidine ring makes dihedral angles of 12.4 (2) and 66.8 (3)° with the pyridine (N4/C5–C9) and phenyl (C10–C15) rings, respectively. The pyridine ring of the title mol­ecule is essentially planar (r.m.s deviation = 0.005 Å). The N2—N1—C4—C5 bridge that links the thia­zolidine and 2,3-di­chloro­benzene rings has a torsion angle of 178.3 (4)°.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of the title salt. Displacement ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level. H atoms are shown as spheres of arbitrary radius.

Supra­molecular features and Hirshfeld surface analysis

As shown in Figs. 2 ▸ and 3 ▸, in the crystal, the cations, anions and water mol­ecules are linked into a three-dimensional network, which forms cross layers parallel to the (120) and (20) planes via O—H⋯Br, N—H⋯Br and N—H⋯N hydrogen bonds (Table 1 ▸). Furthermore, C—H⋯π inter­actions also help in the stabilization of the mol­ecular packing (Table 1 ▸).
Figure 2

A view of the inter­molecular hydrogen bonds of the title compound along the a axis.

Figure 3

A view of the packing and inter­molecular hydrogen bonding of the title compound along the c axis.

Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg2 and Cg3 are the centroids of the N4/C5–C9 pyridine and C10–C15 phenyl ring, respectively.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
O1—H1C⋯Br10.952.393.333 (4)169
O1—H1D⋯Br1i 0.952.563.427 (5)152
N3—H3A⋯Br1ii 0.902.453.333 (4)167
N3—H3B⋯N4iii 0.901.992.840 (6)158
C9—H9ACg2iii 0.932.963.650 (5)132
C12—H12ACg3iv 0.932.823.565 (8)137
C15—H15ACg3v 0.932.803.548 (6)135

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) ; (v) .

Hirshfeld surface analysis was used to investigate the presence of hydrogen bonds and inter­molecular inter­actions in the crystal structure. The Hirshfeld surface analysis (Spackman & Jayatilaka, 2009 ▸) of the title salt was generated by CrystalExplorer3.1 (Wolff et al., 2012 ▸), and comprised d norm surface plots and 2D (two-dimensional) fingerprint plots (Spackman & McKinnon, 2002 ▸). The plots of the Hirshfeld surface mapped over d norm using a standard surface resolution with a fixed colour scale of −0.5782 (red) to 1.2417 a.u. (blue) is shown in Fig. 4 ▸. This plot was generated to qu­antify and visualize the inter­molecular inter­actions and to explain the observed crystal packing. The dark-red spots on the d norm surface arise as a result of short inter­atomic contacts, while the other weaker inter­molecular inter­actions appear as light-red spots.
Figure 4

Hirshfeld surface of the title compound mapped over d norm.

Fig. 5 ▸(a) shows the 2D fingerprint plot of the sum of the contacts contributing to the Hirshfeld surface represented in normal mode. These represent both the overall two-dimensional fingerprint plots and those that represent H⋯H, C⋯H/H⋯C, Br⋯H/H⋯Br, N⋯H/H⋯N and S⋯H/H⋯S contacts, respectively (Figs. 5 ▸ b–f). The most significant inter­molecular inter­actions are the H⋯H inter­actions (35.5%) (Fig. 5 ▸ b). The reciprocal C⋯H/H⋯C inter­actions appear as two symmetrical broad wings with d e + d i ≃ 2.7 Å and contribute 23.9% to the Hirshfeld surface (Fig. 5 ▸ c). The reciprocal Br⋯H/H⋯Br, N⋯H/H⋯N and S⋯H/H⋯S inter­actions with 16.4, 10.6 and 7.9% contributions are present as sharp symmetrical spikes at diagonal axes d e + d i ≃ 2.3, 2.9 and 2.8 Å, respectively (Figs. 5 ▸ d–f). Furthermore, there are O⋯H/H⋯O (2.8%), BrC/CBr (1.1%), Br⋯N/N⋯Br (1.0%), Br⋯S/S⋯Br (0.6%), N⋯C/C⋯N (0.3%) and N⋯N (0.1%) contacts (Table 2 ▸).
Figure 5

The two-dimensional fingerprint plots of the title compound, showing (a) all inter­actions, and delineated into (b) H⋯H, (c) C⋯H/H⋯C, (d) Br⋯H/H⋯Br, (e) N⋯H/H⋯N and (f) S⋯H/H⋯S inter­actions [d e and d i represent the distances from a point on the Hirshfeld surface to the nearest atoms outside (external) and inside (inter­nal) the surface, respectively].

Table 2

Percentage contributions of inter­atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface for the title salt

ContactPercentage contribution
H⋯H35.5
C⋯H/H⋯C23.9
Br⋯H/H⋯Br16.4
N⋯H/H⋯N10.6
S⋯H/H⋯S7.9
Br⋯C/C⋯Br1.1
Br⋯N/N⋯Br1.0
Br⋯S/S⋯Br0.6
C⋯N/N⋯C0.3
N⋯N/N⋯N0.1

Database survey

In a recent article of ours, which on the crystal structure of (E)-3-[(2,3-di­chloro­benzyl­idene)amino]-5-phenyl­thia­zolidin-2-iminium bromide (Akkurt et al., 2018 ▸), the 3-N atom of the cation carries an N substituent, as found in the title compound. In the crystal, C—H⋯Br and N—H⋯Br hydrogen bonds link the components into a three-dimensional network with the cations and anions stacked along the b-axis direction. Weak C—H⋯π inter­actions and inversion-related Cl⋯Cl halogen bonds and C—Cl⋯π(ring) contacts also contribute to the mol­ecular packing. In addition, a search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD Version 5.39, November 2017 + 3 updates; Groom et al., 2016 ▸) yielded six hits for 2-thia­zolidiniminium compounds, with four of them reporting essentially the same cation [CSD refcodes WILBIC (Marthi et al., 1994 ▸), WILBOI (Marthi et al., 1994 ▸), WILBOI01 (Marthi et al., 1994 ▸), YITCEJ (Martem’yanova et al., 1993a ▸), YITCAF (Martem’yanova et al., 1993b ▸) and YOPLUK (Marthi et al., 1995 ▸)]. In all cases, the 3-N atom carries a C substituent not N as found in the title compound. The first three crystal structures were determined for racemic (WILBIC; Marthi et al., 1994 ▸) and two optically active samples (WILBOI and WILBOI01; Marthi et al., 1994 ▸) of 3-(2-chloro-2-phenyl­eth­yl)-2-thia­zolidiniminium p-tolu­ene­sulfonate. In all three structures, the most disordered fragment of these mol­ecules is the asymmetric C atom and the Cl atom attached to it. The disorder of the cation in the racemate corresponds to the presence of both enanti­omers at each site in the ratio 0.821 (3):0.179 (3). The system of hydrogen bonds connecting two cations and two anions into 12-membered rings is identical in the racemic and in the optically active crystals. YITCEJ (Martem’yanova et al., 1993a ▸) is a product of the inter­action of 2-amino-5-methyl­thia­zoline with methyl iodide, with alkyl­ation at the endocylic N atom, while YITCAF (Martem’yanova et al., 1993b ▸) is a product of the reaction of 3-nitro-5-meth­oxy-, 3-nitro-5-chloro- and 3-bromo-5-nitro­salicyl­aldehyde with the heterocyclic base to form the salt-like complexes.

Synthesis and crystallization

To the solution of 1 mmol of 3-amino-5-phenyl­thia­zolidin-2-iminium bromide in 20 ml ethanol was added 1 mmol of isonicotinaldehyde and the solution was refluxed for 2 h. The reaction mixture was then cooled. Reaction products were precipitated from the reaction mixture as colourless single crystals, collected by filtration and washed with cold acetone. Yield: 57%; m.p.: 496 K. Analysis calculated for C15H15BrN4S: C 49.59, H 4.16, N 15.42%; found: C 49.52, H 4.11, N 15.35%. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO-d 6) : δ 4.57 (q, 1H, CH2, 3 J H–H = 6.6 Hz), 4.89 (t, 1H, CH2, 3 J H–H = 8.1 Hz), 5.62 (t, 1H, CH-Ar, 3 J H–H = 7.5 Hz), 7.37–7.57 (m, 5H, 5 Ar-H), 8.015–7.998 (d, 2H, 2CHarom, 3 J H–H = 5.1 Hz), 8.46 (s, 1H, CH=), 8.728–8.711 (d, 2H, 2CHarom, 3 J H–H = 5.1 Hz), 10.52 (s, 2H, NH2=). 13C NMR (75MHz, DMSO-d 6): δ 45.54, 56.00, 122.17, 127.86, 128.98, 129.16, 137.43, 140.16, 148.88, 150.31, 168.98. MS (ESI), m/z: 283.36 [C15H15N4S]+ and 79.88 Br−.

Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 3 ▸. All H atoms were positioned geometrically and refined using a riding model, with O—H = 0.95 Å, N—H = 0.90 Å and C—H = 0.93–0.98 Å, and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(C,N) or 1.5U eq(O) for the H atoms of the water mol­ecule.
Table 3

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC15H15N4S+·Br·H2O
M r 381.30
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21
Temperature (K)296
a, b, c (Å)5.8515 (8), 7.5304 (10), 18.859 (3)
β (°)93.979 (5)
V3)829.0 (2)
Z 2
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)2.61
Crystal size (mm)0.19 × 0.15 × 0.14
 
Data collection
DiffractometerBruker APEXII CCD
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)
T min, T max 0.623, 0.698
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections12061, 3373, 3107
R int 0.076
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.626
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.037, 0.087, 1.08
No. of reflections3373
No. of parameters199
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH-atom parameters constrained
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.49, −0.47
Absolute structureFlack x determined using 1291 quotients [(I +) − (I )]/[(I +) + (I )] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Absolute structure parameter0.004 (8)

Computer programs: APEX2 and SAINT (Bruker, 2007 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011155/xu5936sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011155/xu5936Isup2.hkl CCDC reference: 1837127 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C15H15N4S+·Br·H2OF(000) = 388
Mr = 381.30Dx = 1.527 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 5.8515 (8) ÅCell parameters from 6867 reflections
b = 7.5304 (10) Åθ = 2.9–26.4°
c = 18.859 (3) ŵ = 2.61 mm1
β = 93.979 (5)°T = 296 K
V = 829.0 (2) Å3Block, colorless
Z = 20.19 × 0.15 × 0.14 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometer3107 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
φ and ω scansRint = 0.076
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Bruker, 2007)θmax = 26.4°, θmin = 2.9°
Tmin = 0.623, Tmax = 0.698h = −7→7
12061 measured reflectionsk = −9→9
3373 independent reflectionsl = −21→23
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.037H-atom parameters constrained
wR(F2) = 0.087w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0256P)2 + 0.6286P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.08(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3373 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.49 e Å3
199 parametersΔρmin = −0.47 e Å3
1 restraintAbsolute structure: Flack x determined using 1291 quotients [(I+)-(I-)]/[(I+)+(I-)] (Parsons et al., 2013)
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsAbsolute structure parameter: 0.004 (8)
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Br10.00107 (9)0.87805 (8)0.76086 (3)0.05140 (19)
O10.4881 (7)0.6571 (7)0.7445 (3)0.0670 (13)
H1D0.6190400.7146480.7664870.100*
H1C0.3620400.7332280.7513570.100*
S10.4339 (2)0.15399 (19)0.67953 (6)0.0382 (3)
N10.8263 (6)0.3319 (5)0.8366 (2)0.0295 (9)
N20.7239 (7)0.2983 (5)0.7699 (2)0.0303 (8)
N30.4501 (6)0.1215 (6)0.8202 (2)0.0355 (9)
H3A0.3282820.0495810.8120090.043*
H3B0.5123820.1297910.8650990.043*
N41.3503 (8)0.5477 (6)1.0413 (2)0.0411 (10)
C10.8150 (8)0.3485 (7)0.7026 (2)0.0355 (11)
H1A0.9428710.2725080.6927650.043*
H1B0.8678050.4705880.7045800.043*
C20.6215 (9)0.3270 (6)0.6453 (3)0.0367 (11)
H2A0.5357510.4386910.6407700.044*
C30.5413 (7)0.1933 (6)0.7656 (2)0.0280 (9)
C41.0129 (8)0.4175 (6)0.8403 (3)0.0342 (11)
H4A1.0788210.4528190.7991190.041*
C51.1255 (8)0.4610 (6)0.9111 (2)0.0303 (9)
C61.3363 (9)0.5471 (7)0.9143 (3)0.0399 (12)
H6A1.4051810.5777080.8729990.048*
C71.4407 (9)0.5859 (8)0.9808 (3)0.0415 (12)
H7A1.5825390.6420810.9829610.050*
C81.1475 (10)0.4651 (8)1.0373 (3)0.0421 (12)
H8A1.0819800.4371421.0794570.051*
C91.0312 (8)0.4194 (6)0.9743 (3)0.0349 (11)
H9A0.8908770.3612470.9740940.042*
C100.6939 (9)0.2728 (7)0.5720 (3)0.0354 (11)
C110.8870 (10)0.1764 (8)0.5602 (3)0.0501 (14)
H11A0.9779070.1317510.5985040.060*
C120.9462 (10)0.1458 (11)0.4924 (5)0.064 (2)
H12A1.0819480.0865150.4850020.077*
C130.8064 (13)0.2022 (10)0.4350 (3)0.0626 (19)
H13A0.8467580.1801470.3890020.075*
C140.6057 (15)0.2916 (9)0.4462 (3)0.0610 (19)
H14A0.5086770.3279490.4078010.073*
C150.5505 (11)0.3266 (7)0.5146 (3)0.0450 (13)
H15A0.4157940.3869650.5222680.054*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Br10.0357 (2)0.0535 (3)0.0647 (4)0.0010 (3)0.0019 (2)−0.0076 (4)
O10.059 (3)0.059 (3)0.084 (4)0.016 (3)0.013 (2)−0.008 (3)
S10.0326 (5)0.0560 (8)0.0249 (5)−0.0080 (6)−0.0050 (4)−0.0042 (5)
N10.0331 (19)0.029 (2)0.0250 (18)−0.0004 (14)−0.0079 (14)−0.0049 (13)
N20.0325 (19)0.0329 (19)0.0245 (19)−0.0024 (16)−0.0055 (15)−0.0013 (15)
N30.0296 (18)0.051 (3)0.0252 (19)−0.0036 (19)−0.0033 (15)0.0017 (18)
N40.043 (2)0.043 (3)0.036 (2)0.003 (2)−0.0098 (18)−0.0099 (19)
C10.037 (2)0.042 (3)0.028 (2)−0.002 (2)−0.0003 (17)−0.001 (2)
C20.040 (2)0.034 (3)0.035 (3)0.0068 (19)−0.002 (2)−0.0006 (18)
C30.0238 (19)0.031 (2)0.028 (2)0.0050 (18)−0.0030 (16)−0.0005 (18)
C40.038 (2)0.037 (3)0.027 (2)−0.0021 (19)−0.0028 (18)−0.0039 (18)
C50.032 (2)0.030 (2)0.029 (2)−0.0017 (18)−0.0043 (18)−0.0047 (18)
C60.039 (3)0.046 (3)0.034 (3)−0.009 (2)0.000 (2)−0.006 (2)
C70.031 (2)0.047 (3)0.045 (3)−0.003 (2)−0.009 (2)−0.011 (2)
C80.050 (3)0.047 (3)0.030 (3)0.000 (2)0.004 (2)−0.004 (2)
C90.033 (2)0.037 (3)0.035 (2)−0.0021 (18)−0.0004 (18)−0.0032 (18)
C100.038 (2)0.040 (3)0.027 (2)−0.007 (2)−0.0022 (19)0.0002 (19)
C110.044 (3)0.048 (3)0.056 (3)0.005 (3)−0.014 (3)−0.007 (3)
C120.045 (3)0.067 (4)0.084 (5)−0.005 (4)0.018 (3)−0.031 (4)
C130.093 (5)0.061 (4)0.036 (3)−0.017 (4)0.026 (3)−0.010 (3)
C140.103 (6)0.045 (3)0.032 (3)−0.007 (4)−0.019 (3)0.012 (2)
C150.051 (3)0.037 (3)0.046 (3)0.006 (2)−0.005 (2)−0.003 (2)
O1—H1D0.9500C5—C91.384 (7)
O1—H1C0.9500C5—C61.391 (7)
S1—C31.725 (4)C6—C71.389 (7)
S1—C21.848 (5)C6—H6A0.9300
N1—C41.266 (6)C7—H7A0.9300
N1—N21.380 (5)C8—C91.372 (7)
N2—C31.327 (6)C8—H8A0.9300
N2—C11.459 (6)C9—H9A0.9300
N3—C31.310 (6)C10—C111.374 (8)
N3—H3A0.9000C10—C151.384 (7)
N3—H3B0.9000C11—C121.367 (10)
N4—C71.322 (8)C11—H11A0.9300
N4—C81.337 (8)C12—C131.378 (11)
C1—C21.519 (6)C12—H12A0.9300
C1—H1A0.9700C13—C141.383 (11)
C1—H1B0.9700C13—H13A0.9300
C2—C101.529 (7)C14—C151.376 (9)
C2—H2A0.9800C14—H14A0.9300
C4—C51.484 (6)C15—H15A0.9300
C4—H4A0.9300
H1D—O1—H1C106.0C7—C6—C5118.0 (5)
C3—S1—C291.2 (2)C7—C6—H6A121.0
C4—N1—N2117.6 (4)C5—C6—H6A121.0
C3—N2—N1117.5 (4)N4—C7—C6123.8 (5)
C3—N2—C1116.3 (4)N4—C7—H7A118.1
N1—N2—C1125.7 (4)C6—C7—H7A118.1
C3—N3—H3A118.3N4—C8—C9123.4 (5)
C3—N3—H3B123.4N4—C8—H8A118.3
H3A—N3—H3B117.9C9—C8—H8A118.3
C7—N4—C8117.3 (4)C8—C9—C5119.0 (5)
N2—C1—C2106.9 (4)C8—C9—H9A120.5
N2—C1—H1A110.3C5—C9—H9A120.5
C2—C1—H1A110.3C11—C10—C15119.2 (5)
N2—C1—H1B110.3C11—C10—C2124.8 (5)
C2—C1—H1B110.3C15—C10—C2116.0 (5)
H1A—C1—H1B108.6C12—C11—C10120.4 (6)
C1—C2—C10115.6 (4)C12—C11—H11A119.8
C1—C2—S1104.9 (3)C10—C11—H11A119.8
C10—C2—S1109.6 (3)C11—C12—C13120.5 (6)
C1—C2—H2A108.8C11—C12—H12A119.8
C10—C2—H2A108.8C13—C12—H12A119.8
S1—C2—H2A108.8C12—C13—C14119.6 (6)
N3—C3—N2124.7 (4)C12—C13—H13A120.2
N3—C3—S1121.8 (4)C14—C13—H13A120.2
N2—C3—S1113.5 (3)C15—C14—C13119.6 (6)
N1—C4—C5119.3 (4)C15—C14—H14A120.2
N1—C4—H4A120.3C13—C14—H14A120.2
C5—C4—H4A120.3C14—C15—C10120.5 (6)
C9—C5—C6118.3 (4)C14—C15—H15A119.7
C9—C5—C4123.1 (4)C10—C15—H15A119.7
C6—C5—C4118.6 (4)
C4—N1—N2—C3173.3 (4)C8—N4—C7—C60.8 (8)
C4—N1—N2—C11.8 (7)C5—C6—C7—N4−0.8 (9)
C3—N2—C1—C222.4 (6)C7—N4—C8—C9−0.1 (8)
N1—N2—C1—C2−166.1 (4)N4—C8—C9—C5−0.4 (8)
N2—C1—C2—C10−148.0 (4)C6—C5—C9—C80.3 (7)
N2—C1—C2—S1−27.1 (5)C4—C5—C9—C8−179.9 (5)
C3—S1—C2—C121.6 (3)C1—C2—C10—C1127.7 (7)
C3—S1—C2—C10146.3 (4)S1—C2—C10—C11−90.6 (6)
N1—N2—C3—N30.9 (7)C1—C2—C10—C15−152.3 (5)
C1—N2—C3—N3173.2 (5)S1—C2—C10—C1589.3 (5)
N1—N2—C3—S1−177.7 (3)C15—C10—C11—C125.0 (9)
C1—N2—C3—S1−5.5 (5)C2—C10—C11—C12−175.1 (6)
C2—S1—C3—N3171.0 (4)C10—C11—C12—C13−3.8 (11)
C2—S1—C3—N2−10.3 (4)C11—C12—C13—C140.6 (11)
N2—N1—C4—C5178.3 (4)C12—C13—C14—C151.4 (10)
N1—C4—C5—C9−3.0 (7)C13—C14—C15—C10−0.1 (9)
N1—C4—C5—C6176.7 (5)C11—C10—C15—C14−3.1 (9)
C9—C5—C6—C70.2 (8)C2—C10—C15—C14177.0 (5)
C4—C5—C6—C7−179.6 (5)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1C···Br10.952.393.333 (4)169
O1—H1D···Br1i0.952.563.427 (5)152
N3—H3A···Br1ii0.902.453.333 (4)167
N3—H3B···N4iii0.901.992.840 (6)158
C9—H9A···Cg2iii0.932.963.650 (5)132
C12—H12A···Cg3iv0.932.823.565 (8)137
C15—H15A···Cg3v0.932.803.548 (6)135
  10 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

Review 2.  Resonance-Assisted Hydrogen Bonding as a Driving Force in Synthesis and a Synthon in the Design of Materials.

Authors:  Kamran T Mahmudov; Armando J L Pombeiro
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 5.236

3.  Ligand-Driven Coordination Sphere-Induced Engineering of Hybride Materials Constructed from PbCl2 and Bis-Pyridyl Organic Linkers for Single-Component Light-Emitting Phosphors.

Authors:  Ghodrat Mahmoudi; Atash V Gurbanov; Sabina Rodríguez-Hermida; Rosa Carballo; Mojtaba Amini; Alessia Bacchi; Mariusz P Mitoraj; Filip Sagan; Mercedes Kukułka; Damir A Safin
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 5.165

4.  Cooperative metal-ligand assisted E/Z isomerization and cyano activation at Cu(II) and Co(II) complexes of arylhydrazones of active methylene nitriles.

Authors:  Kamran T Mahmudov; Maximilian N Kopylovich; Alessandra Sabbatini; Michael G B Drew; Luísa M D R S Martins; Claudio Pettinari; Armando J L Pombeiro
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.165

5.  Chalcogen bonding in synthesis, catalysis and design of materials.

Authors:  Kamran T Mahmudov; Maximilian N Kopylovich; M Fátima C Guedes da Silva; Armando J L Pombeiro
Journal:  Dalton Trans       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 4.390

6.  Quasi-aromatic Möbius Metal Chelates.

Authors:  Ghodrat Mahmoudi; Farhad A Afkhami; Alfonso Castiñeiras; Isabel García-Santos; Atash Gurbanov; Fedor I Zubkov; Mariusz P Mitoraj; Mercedes Kukułka; Filip Sagan; Dariusz W Szczepanik; Irina A Konyaeva; Damir A Safin
Journal:  Inorg Chem       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.165

7.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

8.  Use of intensity quotients and differences in absolute structure refinement.

Authors:  Simon Parsons; Howard D Flack; Trixie Wagner
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2013-05-17

9.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

10.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.