Literature DB >> 30225111

N-(6-Meth-oxy-pyridin-2-yl)-1-(pyridin-2-ylmeth-yl)-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide: crystal structure and Hirshfeld surface analysis.

Vivek C Ramani1, Rina D Shah1, Mukesh M Jotani2, Edward R T Tiekink3.   

Abstract

The title compound, C16H15N5O2, adopts the shape of the letter L with the dihedral angle between the outer pyridyl rings being 78.37 (5)°; the dihedral angles between the central pyrazolyl ring (r.m.s. deviation = 0.0023 Å) and the methyl-ene-bound pyridyl and methyoxypyridyl rings are 77.68 (5) and 7.84 (10)°, respectively. Intra-molecular amide-N-H⋯N(pyrazol-yl) and pyridyl-C-H⋯O(amide) inter-actions are evident and these preclude the participation of the amide-N-H and O atoms in inter-molecular inter-actions. The most notable feature of the mol-ecular packing is the formation of linear supra-molecular chains aligned along the b-axis direction mediated by weak carbonyl-C=O⋯π(triazol-yl) inter-actions. An analysis of the calculated Hirshfeld surfaces point to the importance of H⋯H (46.4%), C⋯H (22.4%), O⋯H (11.9%) and N⋯H (11.1%) contacts in the crystal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hirshfeld surface analysis; crystal structure; pyrazol­yl; pyrid­yl

Year:  2018        PMID: 30225111      PMCID: PMC6127692          DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr E Crystallogr Commun


Chemical context

Amide bond formation involving acid–amine coupling is an important synthetic tool for the manufacture of pharmaceuticals and fine chemicals (Schuele et al., 2008 ▸). The use of a variety of acid–amine coupling agents, most commonly carbodi­imides and onium salts such as phospho­nium as well as ammonium salts, for amide bond synthesis has been reviewed (Al-Warhi et al. 2012 ▸; Urich et al., 2014 ▸). In this context, n-propane­phospho­nic acid anhydride (T3P) has proved to be an excellent reagent for amide or peptide bond formation. The synthesis of amide bonds utilizing T3P offers high yields, low epimerization and avoids the use of haza­rdous additives such as explosive hy­droxy­benzotriazole (HOBt). Further, reactions occur with high yields and lead to the easy removal of the by-products with a simple work-up, overall resulting in the formation of high-quality product. In addition, it is noted that the T3P reagent is non-toxic and non-allergenic (Joullie & Lassen, 2010 ▸; Fennie & Roth, 2016 ▸). Moreover, amine bond formation between pyrazole and pyrimidine ring systems can lead to the formation of biologically accepted ingredients such as AM251 (Xi et al., 2006 ▸), as a CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist, and Meclinertant (SR48692; Liu et al., 2017 ▸), a neurotensinreceptor (NTS) antagonist. The combination of such moieties can also lead to mol­ecules with anti-tuberculosis, anti-cancer, anti-bacterial and anti-fungal activities (Fustero et al., 2009 ▸; Pal et al., 2012 ▸; Dar & Shamsuzzaman, 2015 ▸; Sapra et al., 2016 ▸). As part of our studies in this area, acid–amine coupling between heterocycles such as pyrazole and pyridine using efficient coupling reagents such as T3P was performed; herein, the crystal and mol­ecular structures of (I) are described along with an analysis of its calculated Hirshfeld surface.

Structural commentary

The mol­ecular structure of (I), Fig. 1 ▸, comprises an almost planar bi-substituted pyrazolyl ring with the r.m.s. deviation of the fitted atoms being 0.0023 Å. Connected to the ring at the N2 position is a methyl-2-pyridyl residue with the dihedral angle between the five- and six-membered rings being 77.68 (5)°, indicating an almost orthogonal relationship. A substituted amide (C10/N4/O1) group is connected at the C3-position, which is approximately co-planar with the pyrazolyl ring, forming a dihedral angle of 3.5 (3)°. The dihedral angle between the amide atoms and the appended N5-pyridyl ring is 4.4 (3)°, indicating a co-planar relationship. The dihedral angle between the pyridyl rings in (I) of 78.37 (5)° indicates that the mol­ecule has an approximate L-shape. The amide-N4H4N atom is flanked on either side by the pyrazolyl-N1 and pyridyl-N5 atoms and in the same way, the amide-O1 atom accepts a weak intra­molecular inter­action from the C15—H15 grouping; see Table 1 ▸ for geometric data characterizing these inter­actions. Finally, the meth­oxy group is approximately co-planar with the pyridyl ring to which it is attached, as seen in the C16—O2—C12—N5 torsion angle of 4.2 (3)°.
Figure 1

The mol­ecular structure of (I), showing displacement ellipsoids at the 50% probability level.

Table 1

Intra- and intermolecular interactions (Å, °) for (I)

Cg1 is the centroid of the N1/N2/C1–C3 ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N4—H4N⋯N10.86 (1)2.24 (2)2.6939 (18)113 (1)
C15—H15⋯O10.932.332.909 (2)120
C10—O1⋯Cg1i 1.22 (1)3.42 (1)3.5486 (16)86 (1)

Symmetry code: (i) .

Supra­molecular features

The mol­ecular packing of (I) is largely devoid of structure-directing inter­actions as the key amide atoms are involved in intra­molecular contacts. The only identified directional inter­action less than van der Waals separations (Spek, 2009 ▸) is a carbonyl-C10=O2⋯π(triazol­yl) contact, Table 1 ▸. As illus­trated in Fig. 2 ▸ a, these lead to linear supra­molecular chains aligned along the b-axis direction. The supra­molecular chains pack without specific inter­actions between them, Fig. 2 ▸ b.
Figure 2

Supra­molecular association in the crystal of (I): (a) a view of the supra­molecular chain along the b-axis direction sustained by carbonyl-C—O⋯π(triazol­yl) inter­actions shown as purple dashed lines and (b) a view of the unit-cell contents shown in projection down the b axis.

Hirshfeld surface analysis

The Hirshfeld surfaces calculated for (I) were performed in accord with recent studies (Jotani et al., 2016 ▸) and provide additional information on the influence of short inter­atomic contacts influential in the mol­ecular packing. On the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over d norm in Fig. 3 ▸, the presence of diminutive red spots near the pyrazole-N1, methyl-H16B, pyridyl-N3 and pyridyl-H5 atoms are indicative of short inter­atomic N⋯H/H⋯N contacts (Table 2 ▸). In addition, the presence of diminutive red spots near the carbonyl-O1 and pyridyl-H6 atoms on the surface connect the mol­ecules through short inter­atomic O⋯H/H⋯O contacts (Table 2 ▸) are highlighted through black dashed lines in Fig. 3 ▸ a. The faint-red spots appearing near the pyridyl-C5, C6 and C8 atoms and the pyrazolyl-H1 atom in Fig. 3 ▸ b represent the short inter­atomic CC and C⋯H/H⋯C contacts (Table 3 ▸) between these atoms. The inter­molecular C=O⋯π contacts connecting the mol­ecules along the b-axis direction are illustrated in Fig. 3 ▸ c. The weak inter­molecular inter­actions described above are also viewed as the blue and red regions near the respective atoms on the Hirshfeld surfaces mapped over the calculated electrostatic potential shown in Fig. 4 ▸.
Figure 3

Three views of the Hirshfeld surface for (I) mapped over d norm in the range −0.093 to +1.418 a.u. highlighting (a) short inter­atomic O⋯H/H⋯O (yellow dashed lines) and N⋯H/H⋯N (black) contacts dashed lines, (b) C⋯C (red) and C⋯H/H⋯C (sky-blue) contacts and (c) C=O⋯π contacts (black dotted lines).

Table 2

Summary of short inter­atomic contacts (Å) in (I)

ContactDistanceSymmetry operation
O1⋯H62.47 x,  − y,  + z
N1⋯H16B 2.58x, 1 − y, −z
N3⋯H52.541 − x, 1 − y, −z
C6⋯H12.721 − x, − y, z
C5⋯C83.380 (3) x, 1 + y, z
Table 3

Percentage contributions of inter­atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface for (I)

ContactPercentage contribution
H⋯H46.4
O⋯H/H⋯O11.9
N⋯H/H⋯N11.1
C⋯H/H⋯C22.4
C⋯N/N⋯C3.5
C⋯O/O⋯C1.9
N⋯N1.3
C⋯C1.2
N⋯O/O⋯N0.4
Figure 4

Two views of the Hirshfeld surface mapped over the electrostatic potential in the range −0.080 to +0.044 a.u. The red and blue regions represent negative and positive electrostatic potentials, respectively.

The overall two-dimensional fingerprint plot for (I), Fig. 5 ▸ a, and those delineated into H⋯H, N⋯H/H⋯N, O⋯H/H⋯O, C⋯H/H⋯C and CC contacts (McKinnon et al., 2007 ▸) are illustrated in Fig. 5 ▸ b–f, respectively, and the percentage contributions from the different inter­atomic contacts to the Hirshfeld surface are summarized in Table 3 ▸. The greatest, i.e. 46.4%, contribution to the Hirshfeld surfaces are from H⋯H contacts and indicates the significance of dispersive forces on the mol­ecular packing as the inter­atomic distances involving these contacts are greater than the sum of van der Waals radii. The short inter­atomic O⋯H/H⋯O and C⋯H/H⋯C contacts in the crystal structure of (I) are characterized as the pair of thin needle-like and forceps-like tips at d e + d i ∼ 2.5 Å and 2.7 Å, respectively, in the corresponding delineated fingerprint plots Fig. 5 ▸ c and e. The pair of spikes with the tips at d e + d i ∼ 2.6 Å and the regions of green points aligned in the fingerprint plot delineated into N⋯H/H⋯N contacts, Fig. 5 ▸ d, are indicative of short N⋯H inter­atomic contacts (Table 2 ▸). In the fingerprint plot delineated into CC contacts, Fig. 5 ▸ f, the presence of points at d e + d i < 3.4 Å, i.e. less than the sum of van der Waals radii, are due to short inter­atomic C5⋯C8 contacts involving pyridyl-carbon atoms (Fig. 3 ▸ b) although the contribution from these contacts is relatively small. The notable percentage contributions from O⋯N/N⋯O and C⋯O/O⋯C contacts to the Hirshfeld surfaces (Table 2 ▸) in the crystal arise from the presence of the inter­molecular C=O⋯π contacts. The inter­atomic N⋯N contacts show no significant contribution to the packing of (I).
Figure 5

(a) The full two-dimensional fingerprint plot for (I) and (b)-(f) those delineated into H⋯H, O⋯H/H⋯O, N⋯H/H⋯N, C⋯H/H⋯C and C⋯C, contacts, respectively.

Database survey

The 1,3 NC and CC(=O)N(H)—C substitution pattern observed in (I), with hydrogen atoms at the C1 and C2 positions, is unprecedented in structural chemistry according to a search of the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD Version 5.39, May update; Groom et al., 2016 ▸). There are considerably more examples of structures with substituents at one of and at both the C1 and C2 positions but none of these are substituents are pyridyl groups.

Synthesis and crystallization

1H-Pyrazole-4-carb­oxy­lic acid (0.0446 mol) was treated with diiso­propyl­ethyl amine (0.0669 mol) and 1-propane phospho­nic acid (T3P) (0.0669 mol) in dimethyl formamide (10 ml) at 273 K for 15 min. Then, 6-meth­oxy­pyridin-2-amine (0.0490 mol) was added at 273 K. The reaction mixture was heated at 353 K for 3 h. After completion of the reaction, the product was extracted with ethyl acetate and the excess solvent was removed under vacuum. The product was recrystallized using methanol as solvent to yield 1-(6-meth­oxy­pyridin-2-ylmeth­yl)-1H-pyrazole-4-carb­oxy­lic acid. This product (0.0246 mol) and 2-(chloro­meth­yl)pyridine (0.0295 mol) were dissolved in acetone (10 ml), potassium carbonate (0.0369) was added and the reaction mixture was heated at 329 K for 5 h. After completion of the reaction, the product was extracted with ethyl acetate twice (5 ml) and the extract was concentrated under vacuum. The product was washed with diethyl ether (3 ml) and recrystallized from methanol solution to obtain the title compound, (I), as colourless blocks in 88% yield. M.p. 414-415 K. CHN analysis: calculated. C, 62.13; H, 4.89; N, 22.64%; observed: C, 62.06; H, 4.81; N, 22.84%.

Refinement details

Crystal data, data collection and structure refinement details are summarized in Table 4 ▸. The carbon-bound H atoms were placed in calculated positions (C—H = 0.93–0.97 Å) and were included in the refinement in the riding-model approximation, with U iso(H) set to 1.2–1.5U eq(C). The N-bound H atoms was refined with a distance restraint of 0.86±0.01 Å, and with U iso(H) = 1.2U eq(N).
Table 4

Experimental details

Crystal data
Chemical formulaC16H15N5O2
M r 309.33
Crystal system, space groupMonoclinic, P21/c
Temperature (K)293
a, b, c (Å)15.8867 (15), 4.6473 (4), 21.6740 (19)
β (°)108.623 (3)
V3)1516.4 (2)
Z 4
Radiation typeMo Kα
μ (mm−1)0.09
Crystal size (mm)0.47 × 0.43 × 0.28
 
Data collection
DiffractometerRigaku SCX mini
Absorption correctionMulti-scan (REQAB; Rigaku, 1998)
T min, T max 0.808, 0.974
No. of measured, independent and observed [I > 2σ(I)] reflections14205, 3458, 2354
R int 0.031
(sin θ/λ)max−1)0.649
 
Refinement
R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)], wR(F 2), S 0.042, 0.117, 1.02
No. of reflections3458
No. of parameters212
No. of restraints1
H-atom treatmentH atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
Δρmax, Δρmin (e Å−3)0.13, −0.17

Computer programs: CrystalClear-SM Expert (Rigaku, 2011 ▸), SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▸), SHELXL2014 (Sheldrick, 2015 ▸), ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▸), DIAMOND (Brandenburg, 2006 ▸) and publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▸).

Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011477/hb7767sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011477/hb7767Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supporting information file. DOI: 10.1107/S2056989018011477/hb7767Isup3.cml CCDC reference: 1861657 Additional supporting information: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C16H15N5O2F(000) = 648
Mr = 309.33Dx = 1.355 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 15.8867 (15) ÅCell parameters from 11059 reflections
b = 4.6473 (4) Åθ = 3.2–27.7°
c = 21.6740 (19) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
β = 108.623 (3)°T = 293 K
V = 1516.4 (2) Å3Block, colourless
Z = 40.47 × 0.43 × 0.28 mm
Rigaku SCX mini diffractometer2354 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Detector resolution: 6.849 pixels mm-1Rint = 0.031
ω scansθmax = 27.5°, θmin = 3.8°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (REQAB; Rigaku, 1998)h = −19→20
Tmin = 0.808, Tmax = 0.974k = −6→6
14205 measured reflectionsl = −28→28
3458 independent reflections
Refinement on F21 restraint
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: mixed
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.042H atoms treated by a mixture of independent and constrained refinement
wR(F2) = 0.117w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0534P)2 + 0.1998P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.02(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
3458 reflectionsΔρmax = 0.13 e Å3
212 parametersΔρmin = −0.17 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.33267 (7)0.7478 (2)0.23734 (5)0.0605 (3)
O2−0.08095 (9)0.9148 (4)0.07466 (8)0.1027 (5)
N10.30289 (8)0.2514 (2)0.10788 (5)0.0434 (3)
N20.36665 (8)0.0898 (2)0.09706 (5)0.0457 (3)
N30.40561 (8)0.2467 (3)−0.01587 (6)0.0511 (3)
N40.20890 (8)0.6321 (3)0.15313 (6)0.0516 (3)
H4N0.1920 (10)0.521 (3)0.1198 (6)0.062*
N50.06549 (9)0.7801 (3)0.11608 (7)0.0577 (4)
C10.44689 (10)0.1427 (3)0.14031 (7)0.0517 (4)
H10.50010.05580.14150.062*
C20.43609 (10)0.3459 (3)0.18194 (7)0.0483 (4)
H20.47950.42660.21720.058*
C30.34578 (9)0.4073 (3)0.16025 (6)0.0408 (3)
C40.34470 (12)−0.1001 (3)0.04122 (7)0.0548 (4)
H4A0.2866−0.18330.03500.066*
H4B0.3874−0.25630.05020.066*
C50.34405 (10)0.0471 (3)−0.02091 (6)0.0438 (3)
C60.40938 (11)0.3653 (4)−0.07088 (7)0.0567 (4)
H60.45160.5076−0.06790.068*
C70.35489 (12)0.2904 (4)−0.13146 (8)0.0615 (5)
H70.36090.3760−0.16860.074*
C80.29151 (12)0.0865 (4)−0.13579 (8)0.0663 (5)
H80.25300.0310−0.17620.080*
C90.28514 (11)−0.0364 (4)−0.07958 (7)0.0573 (4)
H90.2417−0.1733−0.08140.069*
C100.29654 (9)0.6120 (3)0.18811 (6)0.0442 (3)
C110.14308 (10)0.8033 (3)0.16395 (7)0.0488 (4)
C12−0.00155 (11)0.9321 (4)0.12181 (9)0.0682 (5)
C130.00381 (13)1.1138 (4)0.17359 (11)0.0755 (5)
H13−0.04511.21860.17550.091*
C140.08339 (13)1.1327 (4)0.22134 (10)0.0722 (5)
H140.08951.25200.25700.087*
C150.15550 (12)0.9762 (4)0.21746 (8)0.0611 (4)
H150.21040.98750.24990.073*
C16−0.08995 (15)0.7152 (6)0.02254 (13)0.1148 (9)
H16A−0.04950.7665−0.00050.172*
H16B−0.14970.7207−0.00680.172*
H16C−0.07660.52450.04000.172*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0609 (7)0.0742 (7)0.0434 (6)−0.0007 (6)0.0123 (5)−0.0163 (5)
O20.0550 (8)0.1215 (13)0.1194 (12)0.0237 (8)0.0108 (8)−0.0180 (11)
N10.0491 (7)0.0441 (6)0.0367 (6)0.0006 (5)0.0130 (5)0.0019 (5)
N20.0561 (7)0.0435 (6)0.0385 (6)0.0048 (6)0.0166 (5)0.0020 (5)
N30.0564 (8)0.0524 (7)0.0433 (7)0.0002 (6)0.0142 (6)0.0009 (6)
N40.0473 (7)0.0551 (8)0.0505 (7)0.0009 (6)0.0129 (6)−0.0120 (6)
N50.0477 (7)0.0609 (8)0.0643 (8)0.0031 (6)0.0175 (6)−0.0004 (7)
C10.0482 (8)0.0594 (9)0.0465 (8)0.0102 (7)0.0139 (7)0.0080 (7)
C20.0463 (8)0.0567 (9)0.0374 (7)0.0026 (7)0.0073 (6)0.0039 (7)
C30.0462 (8)0.0439 (7)0.0312 (6)−0.0011 (6)0.0109 (6)0.0050 (6)
C40.0765 (11)0.0416 (8)0.0490 (8)0.0004 (8)0.0240 (8)−0.0025 (7)
C50.0505 (8)0.0399 (7)0.0428 (7)0.0091 (6)0.0175 (6)−0.0028 (6)
C60.0583 (9)0.0605 (10)0.0550 (9)0.0030 (8)0.0235 (8)0.0070 (8)
C70.0692 (11)0.0741 (11)0.0438 (8)0.0168 (9)0.0215 (8)0.0106 (8)
C80.0682 (11)0.0806 (12)0.0412 (8)0.0107 (10)0.0050 (8)−0.0063 (8)
C90.0570 (9)0.0597 (10)0.0525 (9)−0.0012 (8)0.0138 (7)−0.0064 (8)
C100.0492 (8)0.0478 (8)0.0360 (7)−0.0035 (7)0.0141 (6)0.0024 (6)
C110.0493 (8)0.0467 (8)0.0545 (9)−0.0021 (7)0.0222 (7)0.0018 (7)
C120.0516 (10)0.0708 (11)0.0842 (13)0.0081 (9)0.0245 (9)0.0051 (10)
C130.0673 (12)0.0695 (12)0.1041 (15)0.0109 (10)0.0478 (12)0.0003 (11)
C140.0789 (13)0.0668 (11)0.0847 (13)−0.0001 (10)0.0455 (11)−0.0141 (10)
C150.0621 (10)0.0615 (10)0.0648 (10)−0.0035 (8)0.0274 (8)−0.0103 (8)
C160.0657 (13)0.134 (2)0.1161 (19)0.0129 (14)−0.0116 (13)−0.0294 (18)
O1—C101.2147 (16)C4—H4A0.9700
O2—C121.349 (2)C4—H4B0.9700
O2—C161.433 (3)C5—C91.372 (2)
N1—C31.3354 (17)C6—C71.367 (2)
N1—N21.3404 (16)C6—H60.9300
N2—C11.3421 (18)C7—C81.364 (3)
N2—C41.4476 (18)C7—H70.9300
N3—C51.3271 (18)C8—C91.378 (2)
N3—C61.3321 (19)C8—H80.9300
N4—C101.3593 (18)C9—H90.9300
N4—C111.3920 (19)C11—C151.372 (2)
N4—H4N0.859 (9)C12—C131.385 (3)
N5—C121.317 (2)C13—C141.357 (3)
N5—C111.338 (2)C13—H130.9300
C1—C21.355 (2)C14—C151.382 (2)
C1—H10.9300C14—H140.9300
C2—C31.3893 (19)C15—H150.9300
C2—H20.9300C16—H16A0.9600
C3—C101.477 (2)C16—H16B0.9600
C4—C51.508 (2)C16—H16C0.9600
C12—O2—C16118.00 (16)C8—C7—H7121.0
C3—N1—N2104.11 (11)C6—C7—H7121.0
N1—N2—C1112.18 (12)C7—C8—C9119.21 (15)
N1—N2—C4119.62 (12)C7—C8—H8120.4
C1—N2—C4128.10 (13)C9—C8—H8120.4
C5—N3—C6117.26 (13)C5—C9—C8118.76 (16)
C10—N4—C11129.51 (13)C5—C9—H9120.6
C10—N4—H4N114.6 (11)C8—C9—H9120.6
C11—N4—H4N115.8 (11)O1—C10—N4124.52 (14)
C12—N5—C11117.15 (15)O1—C10—C3122.02 (13)
N2—C1—C2107.38 (13)N4—C10—C3113.46 (12)
N2—C1—H1126.3N5—C11—C15123.41 (15)
C2—C1—H1126.3N5—C11—N4112.27 (13)
C1—C2—C3104.75 (13)C15—C11—N4124.32 (15)
C1—C2—H2127.6N5—C12—O2119.06 (18)
C3—C2—H2127.6N5—C12—C13124.14 (17)
N1—C3—C2111.57 (13)O2—C12—C13116.80 (17)
N1—C3—C10120.24 (12)C14—C13—C12117.31 (17)
C2—C3—C10128.18 (13)C14—C13—H13121.3
N2—C4—C5113.65 (12)C12—C13—H13121.3
N2—C4—H4A108.8C13—C14—C15120.52 (17)
C5—C4—H4A108.8C13—C14—H14119.7
N2—C4—H4B108.8C15—C14—H14119.7
C5—C4—H4B108.8C11—C15—C14117.47 (17)
H4A—C4—H4B107.7C11—C15—H15121.3
N3—C5—C9122.73 (14)C14—C15—H15121.3
N3—C5—C4116.68 (13)O2—C16—H16A109.5
C9—C5—C4120.50 (14)O2—C16—H16B109.5
N3—C6—C7123.98 (16)H16A—C16—H16B109.5
N3—C6—H6118.0O2—C16—H16C109.5
C7—C6—H6118.0H16A—C16—H16C109.5
C8—C7—C6118.04 (15)H16B—C16—H16C109.5
C3—N1—N2—C1−0.62 (14)C11—N4—C10—O10.4 (2)
C3—N1—N2—C4−177.19 (11)C11—N4—C10—C3−179.08 (14)
N1—N2—C1—C20.51 (16)N1—C3—C10—O1176.69 (13)
C4—N2—C1—C2176.71 (13)C2—C3—C10—O1−2.7 (2)
N2—C1—C2—C3−0.17 (16)N1—C3—C10—N4−3.79 (18)
N2—N1—C3—C20.50 (14)C2—C3—C10—N4176.79 (14)
N2—N1—C3—C10−179.01 (11)C12—N5—C11—C15−0.3 (2)
C1—C2—C3—N1−0.21 (16)C12—N5—C11—N4179.54 (14)
C1—C2—C3—C10179.25 (13)C10—N4—C11—N5175.29 (14)
N1—N2—C4—C583.78 (16)C10—N4—C11—C15−4.9 (3)
C1—N2—C4—C5−92.17 (18)C11—N5—C12—O2−179.95 (16)
C6—N3—C5—C9−0.7 (2)C11—N5—C12—C130.5 (3)
C6—N3—C5—C4175.81 (13)C16—O2—C12—N54.2 (3)
N2—C4—C5—N337.45 (19)C16—O2—C12—C13−176.20 (19)
N2—C4—C5—C9−145.99 (14)N5—C12—C13—C14−0.5 (3)
C5—N3—C6—C7−1.0 (2)O2—C12—C13—C14179.96 (18)
N3—C6—C7—C81.5 (3)C12—C13—C14—C150.2 (3)
C6—C7—C8—C9−0.4 (3)N5—C11—C15—C140.1 (2)
N3—C5—C9—C81.7 (2)N4—C11—C15—C14−179.76 (15)
C4—C5—C9—C8−174.61 (14)C13—C14—C15—C110.0 (3)
C7—C8—C9—C5−1.2 (2)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N4—H4N···N10.86 (1)2.24 (2)2.6939 (18)113 (1)
C15—H15···O10.932.332.909 (2)120
C10—O1···Cg1i1.22 (1)3.42 (1)3.5486 (16)86 (1)
  9 in total

1.  Towards quantitative analysis of intermolecular interactions with Hirshfeld surfaces.

Authors:  Joshua J McKinnon; Dylan Jayatilaka; Mark A Spackman
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2007-10-07       Impact factor: 6.222

2.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

3.  Cannabinoid CB1 receptor antagonist AM251 inhibits cocaine-primed relapse in rats: role of glutamate in the nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  Zheng-Xiong Xi; Jeremy G Gilbert; Xiao-Qing Peng; Arlene C Pak; Xia Li; Eliot L Gardner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-08-16       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Neurotensin Receptor 1 Antagonist SR48692 Improves Response to Carboplatin by Enhancing Apoptosis and Inhibiting Drug Efflux in Ovarian Cancer.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Mikaël Agopiantz; Joël Poupon; Zherui Wu; Pierre-Alexandre Just; Bruno Borghese; Evelyne Ségal-Bendirdjian; Guillaume Gauchotte; Anne Gompel; Patricia Forgez
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  Efficacy of a single application of a 12.5% pyriprole topical solution against laboratory infestations with ticks (Ixodes ricinus, Dermacentor reticulatus, and Rhipicephalus sanguineus) on dogs.

Authors:  G Schuele; S Barnett; B Bapst; T Cavaliero; L Luempert; G Strehlau; D R Young; C Moran; P Junquera
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr C Struct Chem       Date:  2015-01-01       Impact factor: 1.172

7.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20

8.  The design and synthesis of potent and selective inhibitors of Trypanosoma brucei glycogen synthase kinase 3 for the treatment of human african trypanosomiasis.

Authors:  Robert Urich; Raffaella Grimaldi; Torsten Luksch; Julie A Frearson; Ruth Brenk; Paul G Wyatt
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  The Cambridge Structural Database.

Authors:  Colin R Groom; Ian J Bruno; Matthew P Lightfoot; Suzanna C Ward
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci Cryst Eng Mater       Date:  2016-04-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.