| Literature DB >> 30225089 |
Yanluo Xie1, Kemeng Xiao1, Yang Sun1, Yufeng Gao1, Han Yang1, Heng Xu1.
Abstract
An improved method was applied for remediating cadmium andEntities:
Keywords: Cd–Cu contaminated soil; Rhizoma chuanxiong; accumulation; amendments
Year: 2018 PMID: 30225089 PMCID: PMC6124074 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.181138
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Basic properties of the soil in this experiment.
| properties | values |
|---|---|
| pH | 6.5 |
| cation exchange capacity (CEC, cmol kg−1) | 12.1 |
| sand (0.006–2 mm) (%) | 68.1 |
| clay (less than 0.002 mm) (%) | 6.2 |
| silt (0.0002–0.06 mm) (%) | 25.7 |
| organic content (g kg−1) | 16.8 |
| Cd (mg kg−1) | 8.9 |
| Cu (mg kg−1) | 164.2 |
Composition and proportion of amendments in T1, T2, T3, T4, T5 and T6.
| treatment | composition | proportion |
|---|---|---|
| T1 | bentonite : phosphate : humic acid : biochar | 58% : 2% : 2% : 38% |
| T2 | bentonite : phosphate : biochar : silicon fertilizer | 85% : 3% : 7% : 5% |
| T3 | bentonite : phosphate : biological matrix : compost | 40% : 17% : 26% : 17% |
| T4 | bentonite : phosphate : biological matrix : silicon fertilizer | 40% : 15% : 25% : 20% |
| T5 | bentonite : phosphate : humic acid : biochar | 50% : 15% : 15% : 20% |
| T6 | sepiolite powder : biochar : dolomite powder : KH2PO4 | 40% : 30% : 20% : 10% |
Figure 1.Effects of soil pH with different amendments. pH of soils with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.
Figure 2.Effects of heavy metal availability in soil. Available metals in soil with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) and capital letter (A, B) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.
Figure 3.Effects of microbial activities in soil. Microbial counts including bacterial and fungi (a) and soil respiration (b) from different treatments. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) in bacterial counts and capital letter (A) in fungi counts indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.
Figure 4.Effects of soil enzymatic activities. Enzymatic activities of soils with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. (a) Dehydrogenase activity, urease activity; (b) invertase activity, FDA activity. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.
Figure 5.Effects of R. chuanxiong biomass. Biomass of R. chuanxiong in different treatments. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.
Figure 6.Effects of heavy metal concentration in R. chuanxiong. Metal concentrations with different treatments after R. chuanxiong was harvested. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d, e) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.
Figure 7.Effects of antioxidant system in R. chuanxiong. MDA and H2O2 concentration of R. chuanxiong in different treatments. Error bar represents the standard deviation of three samples. Columns denoted by different lowercase letters (a, b, c, d) indicate significant (p < 0.05) differences among different treatments. T0, treatment without amendment; T1–T6, treatments with different amendments.
Figure 8.FTIR of all amendments in different treatments.