Literature DB >> 30224815

High ecological complexity in benthic Ediacaran communities.

Simon A F Darroch1, Marc Laflamme2, Peter J Wagner3.   

Abstract

A long-running debate over the affinities of the Neoproterozoic 'Ediacara biota' has led to contrasting interpretations of Ediacaran ecosystem complexity. A 'simple' model assumes that most, if not all, Ediacaran organisms shared similar basic ecologies. A contrasting 'complex' model suggests that the Ediacara biota more likely represent organisms from a variety of different positions on the eukaryotic tree and thus occupied a wide range of different ecologies. We perform a quantitative test of Ediacaran ecosystem complexity using rank abundance distributions (RADs). We show that the Ediacara biota formed complex-type communities throughout much of their stratigraphic range and thus likely comprised species that competed for different resources and/or created niche for others ('ecosystem engineers'). One possible explanation for this pattern rests in the recent inference of multiple metazoan-style feeding modes among the Ediacara biota; in this scenario, different Ediacaran groups/clades were engaged in different methods of nutrient collection and thus competed for different resources. This result illustrates that the Ediacara biota may not have been as bizarre as it is sometimes suggested, and provides an ecological link with the animal-dominated benthic ecosystems of the Palaeozoic era.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30224815     DOI: 10.1038/s41559-018-0663-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2397-334X            Impact factor:   15.460


  8 in total

Review 1.  The rise and early evolution of animals: where do we stand from a trace-fossil perspective?

Authors:  M Gabriela Mángano; Luis A Buatois
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.906

2.  Metacommunity analyses show an increase in ecological specialisation throughout the Ediacaran period.

Authors:  Rebecca Eden; Andrea Manica; Emily G Mitchell
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 9.593

3.  Increase in metazoan ecosystem engineering prior to the Ediacaran-Cambrian boundary in the Nama Group, Namibia.

Authors:  Alison T Cribb; Charlotte G Kenchington; Bryce Koester; Brandt M Gibson; Thomas H Boag; Rachel A Racicot; Helke Mocke; Marc Laflamme; Simon A F Darroch
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Gregarious suspension feeding in a modular Ediacaran organism.

Authors:  Brandt M Gibson; Imran A Rahman; Katie M Maloney; Rachel A Racicot; Helke Mocke; Marc Laflamme; Simon A F Darroch
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  The importance of neutral over niche processes in structuring Ediacaran early animal communities.

Authors:  Emily G Mitchell; Simon Harris; Charlotte G Kenchington; Philip Vixseboxse; Lucy Roberts; Catherine Clark; Alexandra Dennis; Alexander G Liu; Philip R Wilby
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 9.492

6.  Pentaradial eukaryote suggests expansion of suspension feeding in White Sea-aged Ediacaran communities.

Authors:  Kelsie Cracknell; Diego C García-Bellido; James G Gehling; Martin J Ankor; Simon A F Darroch; Imran A Rahman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Damaged Dickinsonia specimens provide clues to Ediacaran vendobiont biology.

Authors:  Gregory J Retallack
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 8.  Ancient life and moving fluids.

Authors:  Brandt M Gibson; David J Furbish; Imran A Rahman; Mark W Schmeeckle; Marc Laflamme; Simon A F Darroch
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2020-09-22
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.