Literature DB >> 30224322

Post-anaesthesia pulmonary complications after use of muscle relaxants (POPULAR): a multicentre, prospective observational study.

Eva Kirmeier1, Lars I Eriksson2, Heidrun Lewald1, Malin Jonsson Fagerlund2, Andreas Hoeft3, Markus Hollmann4, Claude Meistelman5, Jennifer M Hunter6, Kurt Ulm7, Manfred Blobner8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Results from retrospective studies suggest that use of neuromuscular blocking agents during general anaesthesia might be linked to postoperative pulmonary complications. We therefore aimed to assess whether the use of neuromuscular blocking agents is associated with postoperative pulmonary complications.
METHODS: We did a multicentre, prospective observational cohort study. Patients were recruited from 211 hospitals in 28 European countries. We included patients (aged ≥18 years) who received general anaesthesia for any in-hospital procedure except cardiac surgery. Patient characteristics, surgical and anaesthetic details, and chart review at discharge were prospectively collected over 2 weeks. Additionally, each patient underwent postoperative physical examination within 3 days of surgery to check for adverse pulmonary events. The study outcome was the incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications from the end of surgery up to postoperative day 28. Logistic regression analyses were adjusted for surgical factors and patients' preoperative physical status, providing adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) and adjusted absolute risk reduction (ARRadj). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01865513.
FINDINGS: Between June 16, 2014, and April 29, 2015, data from 22 803 patients were collected. The use of neuromuscular blocking agents was associated with an increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications in patients who had undergone general anaesthesia (1658 [7·6%] of 21 694); ORadj 1·86, 95% CI 1·53-2·26; ARRadj -4·4%, 95% CI -5·5 to -3·2). Only 2·3% of high-risk surgical patients and those with adverse respiratory profiles were anaesthetised without neuromuscular blocking agents. The use of neuromuscular monitoring (ORadj 1·31, 95% CI 1·15-1·49; ARRadj -2·6%, 95% CI -3·9 to -1·4) and the administration of reversal agents (1·23, 1·07-1·41; -1·9%, -3·2 to -0·7) were not associated with a decreased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Neither the choice of sugammadex instead of neostigmine for reversal (ORadj 1·03, 95% CI 0·85-1·25; ARRadj -0·3%, 95% CI -2·4 to 1·5) nor extubation at a train-of-four ratio of 0·9 or more (1·03, 0·82-1·31; -0·4%, -3·5 to 2·2) was associated with better pulmonary outcomes.
INTERPRETATION: We showed that the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs in general anaesthesia is associated with an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. Anaesthetists must balance the potential benefits of neuromuscular blockade against the increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications. FUNDING: European Society of Anaesthesiology.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30224322     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-2600(18)30294-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Respir Med        ISSN: 2213-2600            Impact factor:   30.700


  58 in total

Review 1.  Reversal of neuromuscular block.

Authors:  J M Hunter
Journal:  BJA Educ       Date:  2020-07-01

2.  [Neuromuscular residual block : Unavoidable risk or reliably treatable?]

Authors:  T Fuchs-Buder
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Inflammatory and coagulative pathophysiology for the management of burn patients with COVID-19: systematic review of the evidence.

Authors:  S Al-Benna
Journal:  Ann Burns Fire Disasters       Date:  2021-03-31

4.  Sugammadex versus Neostigmine for Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade and Postoperative Pulmonary Complications (STRONGER): A Multicenter Matched Cohort Analysis.

Authors:  Sachin Kheterpal; Michelle T Vaughn; Timur Z Dubovoy; Nirav J Shah; Lori D Bash; Douglas A Colquhoun; Amy M Shanks; Michael R Mathis; Roy G Soto; Amit Bardia; Karsten Bartels; Patrick J McCormick; Robert B Schonberger; Leif Saager
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Comparison of intubating conditions after induction with propofol and remifentanil or sufentanil : Randomized controlled REMIDENT trial for surgical tooth extraction.

Authors:  A Dolsan; L Bruneteau; C Roche; F Ferré; F Labaste; A Sommet; J-M Conil; V Minville
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  [Algorithm-based preventive strategies for avoidance of residual neuromuscular blocks].

Authors:  C Unterbuchner; K Ehehalt; B Graf
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Supraglottic airway device versus tracheal intubation and the risk of emergent postoperative intubation after general anaesthesia in adults: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Maximilian Hammer; Peter Santer; Maximilian S Schaefer; Friederike C Althoff; Karuna Wongtangman; Ulrich H Frey; Xinling Xu; Matthias Eikermann; Philipp Fassbender
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 9.166

8.  A Clinical and Budgetary Impact Analysis of Introducing Sugammadex for Routine Reversal of Neuromuscular Blockade in a Hypothetical Cohort in the US.

Authors:  Yiling Jiang; Lori D Bash; Leif Saager
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 9.  The latest trend in neuromuscular monitoring: return of the electromyography.

Authors:  Wonjin Lee
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2021-04-12

10.  Awake or intubated surgery in diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases? A prospective study.

Authors:  Francesco Guerrera; Lorena Costardi; Giulio L Rosboch; Paraskevas Lyberis; Edoardo Ceraolo; Paolo Solidoro; Claudia Filippini; Giulia Verri; Luca Brazzi; Carlo Albera; Enrico Ruffini
Journal:  ERJ Open Res       Date:  2021-07-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.