| Literature DB >> 30223563 |
Andrea Dalbeni1, Davide Treggiari2, Angela Tagetti3, Michele Bevilaqua4, Sara Bonafini5, Martina Montagnana6, Giuliana Scaturro7, Pietro Minuz8, Cristiano Fava9.
Abstract
Tomato consumption has been recently associated with a reduced incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The aim of this study was to test whether a seven-day period of tomato paste purèe (tomato paste, TP) supplementation could improve some haemodynamic parameters in healthy volunteers before and after a standardized fat meal (FM). METHODS ANDEntities:
Keywords: Tomato; arterial stiffness; blood pressure; endothelium; fat meal; stiffness index
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30223563 PMCID: PMC6163719 DOI: 10.3390/nu10091310
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Effects of 1 week of tomato paste on blood pressure (BP), vascular exams, and metabolic parameters in healthy young men.
| Variable at Baseline | LFD & TP | LFD-Only | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 120.4 ± 7.1 | 122.2 ± 13.2 | −1.8 ± 8.9 | 0.39 |
|
| 73.3 ± 6.1 | 72.2 ± 7.2 | 1.1 ± 5.4 | 0.37 |
|
| 64.0 ± 9.5 | 64.1 ± 13.1 | −0.1 ± 10.6 | 0.98 |
|
| 4.0 ± 0.4 | 4.0 ± 0.3 | −0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.53 |
|
| 3.5 ± 1.6 | 4.4 ± 3.3 | −0.9 ± 3.4 | 0.27 |
|
| 2.6 ± 1.9 | 3.4 ± 2.6 | −0.9 ± 2.6 | 0.31 |
|
| 36.4 ± 5.3 | 35.3 ± 10.3 | 1.0 ± 9.4 | 0.49 |
|
| 6.6 ± 0.6 | 6.3 ± 0.5 | 0.3 ± 0.5 | 0.025 |
|
| 71.6 ± 11.2 | 68.0 ± 14.0 | 3.6 ± 13.4 | 0.25 |
|
| 154.5 ± 27.2 | 151.1 ± 26.8 | 3.4 ± 15.0 | 0.34 |
|
| 52.4 ± 15.3 | 52.0 ± 13.5 | 0.4 ± 6.2 | 0.77 |
|
| 87.4 ± 24.5 | 84.2 ± 25.8 | 3.3 ± 12.4 | 0.51 |
|
| 78.2 ± 28.0 | 71.5 ± 30.3 | 6.7 ± 22.3 | 0.21 |
|
| 86.2 ± 6.3 | 85.8 ± 4.5 | 0.5 ± 7.2 | 0.78 |
LFD, Low Fiber Diet; TP, Tomato Paste; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure; HR, Heart Rate; FMD, Flow Mediated Dilatation; NMD, nitroglycerin mediated dilatation; DC, distensibility; SI, Stiffness Index; RI, Reflection Index, HDL, High density Lipoproteins; and LDL, Low density Lipoproteins.
Difference with respect to baseline of BP, vascular exams and metabolic parameters after 2 and 3.5 h from a fat meal ± tomato paste (LFD and TP + FM vs. LFD-only + FM ) in healthy young men.
| Variable at Baseline | Difference LFD & TP + FM (2 h) vs. Baseline | Difference LFD-Only + FM (2 h) vs. Baseline | Difference LFD & TP + FM (3.5 h) vs. Baseline | Difference LFD-Only + FM (3.5 h) vs. Baseline | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.5 ± 6.9 | 0.35 | 0.2 ± 8.2 | 0.93 | 0.8 ± 7.8 | 0.67 | −1.2 ± 9.0 | 0.56 |
|
| −2.6 ± 4.3 | 0.017 | −0.3 ± 6.3 | 0.82 | −0.3 ± 6.4 | 0.82 | −1.3 ± 5.1 | 0.30 |
|
| 4.1 ± 4.8 | 0.001 | 4.5 ± 6.9 | 0.011 | 2.4 ± 6.2 | 0.11 | 0.3 ± 9.9 | 0.90 |
|
| 0.2 ± 0.2 | 0.004 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.26 | 0.1 ± 0.6 | 0.62 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.28 |
|
| 0.7 ± 3.0 | 0.32 | −1.0 ± 3.5 | 0.23 | 0.6 ± 3.0 | 0.41 | 0.1 ± 5.0 | 0.95 |
|
| 1.4 ± 3.1 | 0.16 | 0.6 ± 1.7 | 0.36 | n.p. | n.p. | n.p. | n.p. |
|
| −0.2 ± 5.7 | 0.91 | 3.4 ± 10.5 | 0.17 | 0.7 ± 4.5 | 0.50 | 2.2 ± 8.7 | 0.29 |
|
| −0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.046 | 0.2 ± 0.6 | 0.17 | −0.2 ± 0.5 | 0.09 | 0.4 ± 0.6 | 0.023 |
|
| −11 ± 7.4 | <0.001 | −6.6 ± 7.2 | 0.006 | −5.7 ± 9.5 | 0.019 | 1.3 ± 9.8 | 0.56 |
|
| −3.3 ± 10.7 | 0.19 | −2.8 ± 7.3 | 0.11 | −2.0 ± 8.4 | 0.32 | −3.3 ± 10.2 | 0.17 |
|
| −3.4 ± 4.1 | 0.002 | −3.7 ± 3.3 | <0.001 | −4.3 ± 3.2 | <0.001 | −4.8 ± 3.8 | <0.001 |
|
| −13.0 ± 10.0 | <0.001 | −10.9 ± 8.5 | <0.001 | −10.2 ± 8.9 | <0.001 | −10.1 ± 12.4 | 0.002 |
|
| 72.9 ± 40.8 | <0.001 | 69.4 ± 34.3 | <0.001 | 65.9 ± 45.0 | <0.001 | 66.8 ± 44.6 | <0.001 |
|
| 6.6 ± 20.4 | 0.18 | 9.9 ± 12.8 | 0.003 | 2.3 ± 8.8 | 0.28 | 5.2 ± 5.4 | <0.001 |
FM, Fat Meal; TP, Tomato Paste; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure; HR, Heart Rate; FMD, Flow Mediated Dilatation; NMD, nitroglycerin mediated dilatation; DC, distensibility; SI, Stiffness Index; RI, Reflection Index, HDL, High density Lipoproteins; and LDL, Low density Lipoproteins.
Difference between volunteers who consumed a LFD and TP + FM with respect to LFD-only + FM in the changes with respect to baseline of BP, vascular exams and metabolic parameters.
| Variable at Baseline | Difference between Δ-LFD & TP + FM vs. Δ-LFD-Only +FM (2 h) | Difference between Δ-LFD & TP + FM vs. Δ-LFD-Only + FM (3.5 h) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1.4 ± 11.6 | 0.61 | 0.6 ± 12.4 | 0.83 |
|
| −2.29 ± 7.2 | 0.18 | 0.9 ± 7.0 | 0.58 |
|
| −0.3 ± 7.0 | 0.83 | 2.1 ± 9.3 | 0.34 |
|
| 0.1 ± 0.4 | 0.23 | 0.0 ± 0.6 | 0.90 |
|
| 1.7 ± 4.1 | 0.085 | 0.5 ± 5.7 | 0.69 |
|
| 1.6 ± 3.0 | 0.19 | n.p. | n.p. |
|
| −3.6 ± 11.8 | 0.20 | −1.5 ± 7.6 | 0.41 |
|
| −0.4 ± 0.8 | 0.048 | −0.6 ± 0.9 | 0.022 |
|
| −4.5 ± 13.3 | 0.16 | −4.3 ± 15.4 | 0.23 |
|
| −0.1 ± 14.7 | 0.99 | 1.3 ± 14.9 | 0.70 |
|
| 0.3 ± 5.4 | 0.80 | 0.5 ± 5.7 | 0.72 |
|
| −2.1 ± 11.8 | 0.46 | −0.1 ± 9.5 | 0.97 |
|
| 3.5 ± 41.4 | 0.72 | −0.8 ± 28.3 | 0.90 |
|
| −3.4 ± 22.9 | 0.53 | −2.9 ± 10.6 | 0.24 |
FM, Fat Meal; TP, Tomato Paste; SBP, Systolic Blood Pressure; DBP, Diastolic Blood Pressure; HR, Heart Rate; FMD, Flow Mediated Dilatation; NMD, nitroglycerin mediated dilatation; DC, distensibility; SI, Stiffness Index; RI, Reflection Index, HDL, High density Lipoproteins; and LDL, Low density Lipoproteins.
Figure 1Flow-diagram.