Literature DB >> 30223227

Patient-assisted compression helps for image quality reduction dose and improves patient experience in mammography.

Corinne Balleyguier1, Morgane Cousin2, Ariane Dunant3, Marie Attard2, Suzette Delaloge4, Julia Arfi-Rouche2.   

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of patient-assisted compression (PAC) on image quality, dose, workflow and patient experience of mammography. Patients aged 40-90 years coming for bilateral mammography were included prospectively in the study. After positioning each breast, the technologist performed the compression and exposure of the first breast, initiated the compression of the other until 3 daN and then let the patient complete the compression using a remote control device. Image quality, compression force, breast thickness, average glandular dose and pain value for each breast were assessed for PAC and technologist compression (TC). The compression level was significantly higher with PAC than TC for both craniocaudal (CC; median difference 2.0 daN, p < 0.0001) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views (median difference 1.5 daN, p < 0.0001). Breast thickness was reduced with PAC (CC, median difference -1.90 cm, p = 0.02), as well as glandular dose (CC, median difference -0.03, p = 0.02). The image quality was rated equivalent for both modes in 85% (85/100) of cases, superior for PAC in 10% (10/100) of cases and inferior in 5% (5/100) of cases. There was no significant difference in discomfort or pain felt between PAC and TC modes. Seventy-four percent of patients reported that the self-compressing device would facilitate their reattendance. PAC may be a suitable technique for mammography examinations, providing an equivalent image quality to TC. Moreover, as the breast compression level is increased, PAC may help reduce breast thickness, hence glandular dose. The fact that patients have control over the procedure may change their perception of mammography and improve uptake and compliance.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer; Dose; Image quality; Mammography; Pain; Self-compression

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30223227     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  4 in total

1.  Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Philippe Henrot; Martine Boisserie-Lacroix; Véronique Boute; Philippe Troufléau; Bruno Boyer; Grégory Lesanne; Véronique Gillon; Emmanuel Desandes; Edith Netter; Maryam Saadate; Anne Tardivon; Christine Grentzinger; Julia Salleron; Guillaume Oldrini
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 21.873

2.  Comparison of technical parameters and women's experience between self-compression and standard compression modes in mammography screening: a single-blind randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Natalia Arenas; Rodrigo Alcantara; Margarita Posso; Javier Louro; Daniela Perez-Leon; Belén Ejarque; Mónica Arranz; Jose Maiques; Xavier Castells; Francesc Macià; Marta Román; Ana Rodríguez-Arana
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Patients' and radiographers' experiences of dose reducing abdominal compression in radiographic examinations-A qualitative study.

Authors:  Oili Piippo-Huotari; Eva Funk; Håkan Geijer; Agneta Anderzén-Carlsson
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2020-01-07

4.  A New Technical Mode in Mammography: Self-Compression Improves Satisfaction.

Authors:  Sıla Ulus; Özge Kovan; Aydan Arslan; Pınar Elpen; Erkin Arıbal
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-06-17
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.