Literature DB >> 30223059

Oculomotor inhibition reflects temporal expectations.

Roy Amit1, Dekel Abeles2, Marisa Carrasco3, Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg4.   

Abstract

The accurate extraction of signals out of noisy environments is a major challenge of the perceptual system. Forming temporal expectations and continuously matching them with perceptual input can facilitate this process. In humans, temporal expectations are typically assessed using behavioral measures, which provide only retrospective but no real-time estimates during target anticipation, or by using electrophysiological measures, which require extensive preprocessing and are difficult to interpret. Here we show a new correlate of temporal expectations based on oculomotor behavior. Observers performed an orientation-discrimination task on a central grating target, while their gaze position and EEG were monitored. In each trial, a cue preceded the target by a varying interval ("foreperiod"). In separate blocks, the cue was either predictive or non-predictive regarding the timing of the target. Results showed that saccades and blinks were inhibited more prior to an anticipated regular target than a less-anticipated irregular one. This consistent oculomotor inhibition effect enabled a trial-by-trial classification according to interval-regularity. Additionally, in the regular condition the slope of saccade-rate and drift were shallower for longer than shorter foreperiods, indicating their adjustment according to temporal expectations. Comparing the sensitivity of this oculomotor marker with those of other common predictability markers (e.g. alpha-suppression) showed that it is a sensitive marker for cue-related anticipation. In contrast, temporal changes in conditional probabilities (hazard-rate) modulated alpha-suppression more than cue-related anticipation. We conclude that pre-target oculomotor inhibition is a correlate of temporal predictions induced by cue-target associations, whereas alpha-suppression is more sensitive to conditional probabilities across time.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alpha-oscillations; Blinks; EEG; Eye-movements; Saccades; Temporal expectations

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30223059     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.09.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  17 in total

1.  Temporal attention improves perception similarly at foveal and parafoveal locations.

Authors:  Antonio Fernández; Rachel N Denison; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Oculomotor freezing indicates conscious detection free of decision bias.

Authors:  Alex L White; James C Moreland; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Non-zero mean alpha oscillations revealed with computational model and empirical data.

Authors:  Alina A Studenova; Arno Villringer; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 4.779

4.  The Spatiotemporal Link of Temporal Expectations: Contextual Temporal Expectation Is Independent of Spatial Attention.

Authors:  Noam Tal-Perry; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  Directing Voluntary Temporal Attention Increases Fixational Stability.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Prestimulus inhibition of eye movements reflects temporal expectation rather than time estimation.

Authors:  Noam Tal-Perry; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Oculomotor inhibition precedes temporally expected auditory targets.

Authors:  Dekel Abeles; Roy Amit; Noam Tal-Perry; Marisa Carrasco; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-14       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Oculomotor freezing reflects tactile temporal expectation and aids tactile perception.

Authors:  Stephanie Badde; Caroline F Myers; Shlomit Yuval-Greenberg; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-07-03       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Modeling pupil responses to rapid sequential events.

Authors:  Rachel N Denison; Jacob A Parker; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-10

10.  Microsaccadic Eye Movements but not Pupillary Dilation Response Characterizes the Crossmodal Freezing Effect.

Authors:  Lihan Chen; Hsin-I Liao
Journal:  Cereb Cortex Commun       Date:  2020-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.