Literature DB >> 30222861

Does using applied muscle tension at strategic time points during donation reduce phlebotomist- and donor-reported vasovagal reaction rates? A three-armed randomized controlled trial.

Amanda Thijsen1, Carley N Gemelli2, Tanya E Davison2, Justine O'Donovan1, Barbara Bell1, Barbara Masser3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vasovagal reactions (VVRs) have a negative impact on donor safety and return. Applied muscle tension (AMT) increases blood pressure temporarily and has been suggested as a way to reduce donors' risk of VVRs. This study evaluated whether using AMT at three different time points during the donation procedure reduces the VVR symptoms reported by donors and the VVR reactions recorded by phlebotomists. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A three-arm, multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial was used to compare VVR symptoms and reaction rates between those practicing AMT during the entire donation (n = 244) to practicing AMT at VVR high-risk time points (n = 250) to a standard blood donation control group (n = 240). All participants were asked to drink 500 mL of water in the waiting area, and an even distribution of new and repeat donors was sought across conditions.
RESULTS: Across all conditions, donors reported few VVR symptoms and the rate of reporting did not differ significantly across conditions. However, donors who practiced AMT at strategic time points had a significantly lower number of phlebotomist-registered VVRs in comparison to the other two study groups, with these rates not varying by sex or donor status. Greater compliance by donors with AMT instructions was observed in those asked to practice AMT at strategic time points compared to those asked to practice AMT during the entire donation.
CONCLUSION: Practicing AMT at VVR high-risk time points reduces the number of phlebotomist-registered VVRs.
© 2018 AABB.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30222861     DOI: 10.1111/trf.14940

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  3 in total

1.  Vasovagal reactions in whole blood and apheresis donors: a cross-sectional study on donor haemovigilance data from 2016 to 2019 in Italy.

Authors:  Vanessa Piccinini; Giuseppe Marano; Liviana Catalano; Ilaria Pati; Eva Veropalumbo; Chiara de Waure; Simonetta Pupella; Vincenzo De Angelis
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 5.752

2.  Joint effects of risk factors on adverse events associated with adult blood donations.

Authors:  Hsuan-Hui Wang; Po-Ming Chen; Chi-Ling Lin; Rong-Chiou Jau; Sheng-Mou Hsiao; Jiunn-Liang Ko
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

3.  Prevention of Blood Donation-related Vasovagal Response by Applied Muscle Tension: a Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cong Wang; Li Chen; Chenyu Sun; Yan Zhang; Can Cao; Yuanyuan Ma; Wenwen Shi
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 1.573

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.