BACKGROUND: Detecting recent and rapid spread of HIV can help prioritize prevention and early treatment for those at highest risk of transmission. HIV genetic sequence data can identify transmission clusters, but previous approaches have not distinguished clusters of recent, rapid transmission. We assessed an analytic approach to identify such clusters in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed 156,553 partial HIV-1 polymerase sequences reported to the National HIV Surveillance System and inferred transmission clusters using 2 genetic distance thresholds (0.5% and 1.5%) and 2 periods for diagnoses (all years and 2013-2015, ie, recent diagnoses). For rapidly growing clusters (with ≥5 diagnoses during 2015), molecular clock phylogenetic analysis estimated the time to most recent common ancestor for all divergence events within the cluster. Cluster transmission rates were estimated using these phylogenies. RESULTS: A distance threshold of 1.5% identified 103 rapidly growing clusters using all diagnoses and 73 using recent diagnoses; at 0.5%, 15 clusters were identified using all diagnoses and 13 using recent diagnoses. Molecular clock analysis estimated that the 13 clusters identified at 0.5% using recent diagnoses had been diversifying for a median of 4.7 years, compared with 6.5-13.2 years using other approaches. The 13 clusters at 0.5% had a transmission rate of 33/100 person-years, compared with previous national estimates of 4/100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach identified clusters with transmission rates 8 times those of previous national estimates. This method can identify groups involved in rapid transmission and help programs effectively direct and prioritize limited public health resources.
BACKGROUND: Detecting recent and rapid spread of HIV can help prioritize prevention and early treatment for those at highest risk of transmission. HIV genetic sequence data can identify transmission clusters, but previous approaches have not distinguished clusters of recent, rapid transmission. We assessed an analytic approach to identify such clusters in the United States. METHODS: We analyzed 156,553 partial HIV-1 polymerase sequences reported to the National HIV Surveillance System and inferred transmission clusters using 2 genetic distance thresholds (0.5% and 1.5%) and 2 periods for diagnoses (all years and 2013-2015, ie, recent diagnoses). For rapidly growing clusters (with ≥5 diagnoses during 2015), molecular clock phylogenetic analysis estimated the time to most recent common ancestor for all divergence events within the cluster. Cluster transmission rates were estimated using these phylogenies. RESULTS: A distance threshold of 1.5% identified 103 rapidly growing clusters using all diagnoses and 73 using recent diagnoses; at 0.5%, 15 clusters were identified using all diagnoses and 13 using recent diagnoses. Molecular clock analysis estimated that the 13 clusters identified at 0.5% using recent diagnoses had been diversifying for a median of 4.7 years, compared with 6.5-13.2 years using other approaches. The 13 clusters at 0.5% had a transmission rate of 33/100 person-years, compared with previous national estimates of 4/100 person-years. CONCLUSIONS: Our approach identified clusters with transmission rates 8 times those of previous national estimates. This method can identify groups involved in rapid transmission and help programs effectively direct and prioritize limited public health resources.
Authors: Joel O Wertheim; Alexandra M Oster; Jeffrey A Johnson; William M Switzer; Neeraja Saduvala; Angela L Hernandez; H Irene Hall; Walid Heneine Journal: Virus Evol Date: 2017-04-19
Authors: Ann M Dennis; Dana K Pasquale; Rachael Billock; Steve Beagle; Victoria Mobley; Anna Cope; JoAnn Kuruc; Joseph Sebastian; Charles Walworth; Peter A Leone Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Susan J Little; Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; Christy M Anderson; Jason A Young; Joel O Wertheim; Sanjay R Mehta; Susanne May; Davey M Smith Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Debra L Hanson; Ruiguang Song; Silvina Masciotra; Angela Hernandez; Trudy L Dobbs; Bharat S Parekh; S Michele Owen; Timothy A Green Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-04-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Charles Alpren; Erica L Dawson; Betsey John; Kevin Cranston; Nivedha Panneer; H Dawn Fukuda; Kathleen Roosevelt; R Monina Klevens; Janice Bryant; Philip J Peters; Sheryl B Lyss; William M Switzer; Amanda Burrage; Ashley Murray; Christine Agnew-Brune; Tracy Stiles; Paul McClung; Ellsworth M Campbell; Courtney Breen; Liisa M Randall; Sharoda Dasgupta; Shauna Onofrey; Danae Bixler; Kischa Hampton; Jenifer Leaf Jaeger; Katherine K Hsu; William Adih; Barry Callis; Linda R Goldman; Susie P Danner; Hongwei Jia; Matthew Tumpney; Amy Board; Catherine Brown; Alfred DeMaria; Kate Buchacz Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Susan J Little; Tom Chen; Rui Wang; Christy Anderson; Sergei Kosakovsky Pond; Masato Nakazawa; William C Mathews; Victor DeGruttola; Davey M Smith Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2021-09-07 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Gregory L Armstrong; Duncan R MacCannell; Jill Taylor; Heather A Carleton; Elizabeth B Neuhaus; Richard S Bradbury; James E Posey; Marta Gwinn Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2019-12-26 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Adiba Hassan; Victor De Gruttola; Yunyin W Hu; Zhijuan Sheng; Kathleen Poortinga; Joel O Wertheim Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2020-12-03 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Qiang Xia; Joel O Wertheim; Sarah L Braunstein; Kavita Misra; Chi-Chi Udeagu; Lucia V Torian Journal: AIDS Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Ann M Dennis; Simon D W Frost; Kimberly Enders; Andrew E Cressman; Erik Volz; Nicole Adams; William C Miller; Myron S Cohen; Victoria Mobley; Erika Samoff; Joseph J Eron Journal: EClinicalMedicine Date: 2021-06-17