Literature DB >> 30222644

Individual and Geospatial Characteristics Associated With Use and Nonuse of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) for Colorectal Cancer Screening in an Urban Minority Population.

Daryl Ramai1, Denzil Etienne1, Gloria Ayide2, Paul J Fields3, Madhavi Reddy1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Initiatives by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention as well as the National Colorectal Cancer Roundtable aim to increase the rate of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We assess individual and geographic characteristics associated fecal immunochemical test (FIT) CRC screening over 3 years.
METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 1500 FIT kits which were mailed or opportunistically handed to eligible participants in Brooklyn, New York from January 2014 to December 2016. Eligibility criteria included increased risk for colon cancer, uninsured or underinsured, and a minimum age of 50 years to warrant CRC screening. We looked at the association of individual demographic characteristics and FIT screening by logistic regression using SPPS version 23 software. In addition, using ArcGIS, we coded patients address and layered census tract population information to find associations.
RESULTS: In total, 1367 Cancer Services Participants met our study criteria. The study sample was predominantly female (95.2%) and minority (46% African American, 24.7% Hispanic, 17.3% Caucasian, 11.4% Asian) and on average 59 years old (SD, 5.7). A large majority (73%) had household incomes below $20,000/year. Approximately half (49.9%) of all Cancer Services Participants returned their FIT kit. In participants who did not return their FIT kit, the majority were African American (41%), followed by Hispanics (26.5%), Caucasians (20.6%), and Asians (11.8%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that a screening history of prior colonoscopy or FIT, gender, ethnicity, and educational attainment were significantly associated with FIT CRC screening uptake (P<0.05). Geospatial mapping showed clusters of low screening uptake in areas of high poverty. Hot-spot analysis identified areas of significant vulnerability.
CONCLUSIONS: FIT uptake remains suboptimal. Individual predictors as well as area poverty is associated with low screening uptake. Geospatial mapping is an effective tool for evaluating CRC screening uptake.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30222644     DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0192-0790            Impact factor:   3.062


  3 in total

1.  Urban density differences in colorectal cancer screening participation and screening yield in The Netherlands.

Authors:  Clasine M de Klerk; Manon van der Vlugt; Bente A Smagge; Esther Toes-Zoutendijk; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar; Evelien Dekker; Patrick M Bossuyt
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2022-04-05

2.  Spatial Insights for Understanding Colorectal Cancer Screening in Disproportionately Affected Populations, Central Texas, 2019.

Authors:  F Benjamin Zhan; Niaz Morshed; Nicole Kluz; Bretta Candelaria; Eda Baykal-Caglar; Anjum Khurshid; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  The Role of Health Disparities and Socioeconomic Status in Emergent Gastrointestinal Procedures.

Authors:  Eve May; Kristin O Brown; Edward Gracely; Gisele Podkameni; Linda Franklin; Harpreet Pall
Journal:  Health Equity       Date:  2021-04-30
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.