Literature DB >> 30222450

A Universal Framework for the Benefit-Risk Assessment of Medicines: Is This the Way Forward?

Stuart Walker1,2, Neil McAuslane1, Lawrence Liberti1, James Leong2,3, Sam Salek2.   

Abstract

A universal framework for the evaluation of the benefit-risk assessment of medicines during development by pharmaceutical companies and in the regulatory review by regulatory authorities is considered of value, as it would result in the systematic structured approach to support transparency in decision making. Several organizations have developed frameworks over the past few years, including those recommended by pharmaceutical companies such as the PhRMA BRAT (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Benefit-Risk Action Team) and the BRAIN (Benefit-Risk Assessment in New and Old Drugs) as well as frameworks advanced by regulatory agencies, including the FDA 5-step framework and the EMA PrOACT-URL. However, a review of the criteria-including logical soundness, comprehensiveness, acceptability of results, practicality, specificity and sensitivity, presentation (visualization), and scope proposed for the development of a universal framework-demonstrated that all these different frameworks described can be incorporated into UMBRA (Universal Methodology for Benefit-Risk Assessment).

Keywords:  multicriteria decision making; universal methodology for benefit-risk assessment

Year:  2015        PMID: 30222450     DOI: 10.1177/2168479014547421

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  6 in total

Review 1.  Benefit-risk assessment and reporting in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations.

Authors:  Bethea A Kleykamp; Robert H Dworkin; Dennis C Turk; Zubin Bhagwagar; Penney Cowan; Christopher Eccleston; Susan S Ellenberg; Scott R Evans; John T Farrar; Roy L Freeman; Louis P Garrison; Jennifer S Gewandter; Veeraindar Goli; Smriti Iyengar; Alejandro R Jadad; Mark P Jensen; Roderick Junor; Nathaniel P Katz; J Patrick Kesslak; Ernest A Kopecky; Dmitri Lissin; John D Markman; Michael P McDermott; Philip J Mease; Alec B O'Connor; Kushang V Patel; Srinivasa N Raja; Michael C Rowbotham; Cristina Sampaio; Jasvinder A Singh; Ilona Steigerwald; Vibeke Strand; Leslie A Tive; Jeffrey Tobias; Ajay D Wasan; Hilary D Wilson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 7.926

Review 2.  The value of anticancer drugs - a regulatory view.

Authors:  Francesco Pignatti; Ulla Wilking; Douwe Postmus; Nils Wilking; Julio Delgado; Jonas Bergh
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Can Standardisation of the Public Assessment Report Improve Benefit-Risk Communication?

Authors:  Andrea Keyter; Sam Salek; Shabir Banoo; Stuart Walker
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.810

4.  Evaluation of the Performance of the South Africa Regulatory Agency: Recommendations for Improved Patients' Access to Medicines.

Authors:  Andrea Keyter; Sam Salek; Joey Gouws; Shabir Banoo; Stuart Walker
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 1.778

Review 5.  Evaluating the Success of ZaZiBoNa, the Southern African Development Community Collaborative Medicines Registration Initiative.

Authors:  Tariro Sithole; Gugu Mahlangu; Sam Salek; Stuart Walker
Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 1.778

6.  Benefit-Risk Assessment of Esketamine Nasal Spray vs. Placebo in Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Authors:  Eva G Katz; David Hough; Teodora Doherty; Rosanne Lane; Jaskaran Singh; Bennett Levitan
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 6.875

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.