Literature DB >> 30222326

Low-Cost Passive Sampling Device with Integrated Porous Membrane Produced Using Multimaterial 3D Printing.

Umme Kalsoom1,2, Chowdhury Kamrul Hasan1,3,4, Laura Tedone1, Christopher Desire1, Feng Li1,2, Michael C Breadmore1,2,3, Pavel N Nesterenko1,2,3, Brett Paull1,2,3.   

Abstract

Multimaterial 3D printing facilitates the rapid production of complex devices with integrated materials of varying properties and functionality. Herein, multimaterial fused deposition modeling (MM-FDM) 3D printing was applied to the fabrication of low-cost passive sampler devices with integrated porous membranes. Using MM-FDM 3D printing, the device body was produced using black polylactic acid, with Poro-Lay Lay-Felt filament used for the printing of the integrated porous membranes (rubber-elastomeric polymer, porous after removal of a water-soluble poly(vinyl alcohol) component). The resulting device consisted of two interlocking circular frames, each containing the integrated membrane, which could be efficiently sealed together without the need for additional O-rings, and prevented loss of enclosed microparticulate sorbent. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis of the purified composite filament confirmed the porous properties of the material, an average pore size of ∼30 nm. The printed passive samplers with various membrane thicknesses, including 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 mm, were evaluated for their ability to facilitate the extraction of atrazine as the model solute onto the internal sorbent, under standard conditions. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry was used to determine the uptake of atrazine by the device from standard water samples and also to evaluate any chemical leaching from the printed materials. The sampler with 0.5 mm thick membrane showed the best performance with 87% depletion and a sampling rate of 0.19 Ld-1 ( n = 3, % RSD = 0.59). The results obtained using these printed sampling devices with integrated membranes were in close agreement to devices fitted with a standard poly(ether sulfone) membrane.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 30222326     DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.8b02893

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  6 in total

1.  Optimization of smartphone-based on-site-capable uranium analysis in water using a 3D printed microdevice.

Authors:  Kolsoum Dalvand; Sepideh Keshan Balavandy; Feng Li; Michael Breadmore; Alireza Ghiasvand
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 4.142

Review 2.  Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.

Authors:  Joshua J Davis; Samuel W Foster; James P Grinias
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 4.759

Review 3.  3D Printing-Encompassing the Facets of Dentistry.

Authors:  Gunpreet Oberoi; Sophie Nitsch; Michael Edelmayer; Klara Janjić; Anna Sonja Müller; Hermann Agis
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2018-11-22

Review 4.  3D Printed and Conventional Membranes-A Review.

Authors:  Baye Gueye Thiam; Anouar El Magri; Hamid Reza Vanaei; Sébastien Vaudreuil
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 4.329

5.  Melt-Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing of Transparent Fused Silica Glass.

Authors:  Markus Mader; Leonhard Hambitzer; Phillip Schlautmann; Sophie Jenne; Christian Greiner; Florian Hirth; Dorothea Helmer; Frederik Kotz-Helmer; Bastian E Rapp
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 16.806

6.  The impact of 3D-printed LAY-FOMM 40 and LAY-FOMM 60 on L929 cells and human oral fibroblasts.

Authors:  Gunpreet Oberoi; Sophie Nitsch; Klara Janjić; Hassan Shokoohi-Tabrizi; Andreas Moritz; Francesco Moscato; Ewald Unger; Hermann Agis
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-09-20       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.