Literature DB >> 30221997

Training on the Use of Technology to Collect Patient-Reported Outcome Data Electronically in Clinical Trials: Best Practice Recommendations from the ePRO Consortium.

Jenny J Ly1, Mabel Crescioni2, Sonya Eremenco2, Serge Bodart3, Mario Donoso4, Adam J Butler3, Susan M Dallabrida1.   

Abstract

Electronic capture of patient-reported outcome (PRO) data has many advantages over paper-based data collection. Regulatory agencies have consistently supported the use of electronic PRO (ePRO) data capture and recommended participant and site staff training on the correct use of electronic data capture systems. The objective of this paper is to outline best practice recommendations for training end users, including site staff and study participants, on the use of ePRO technology in clinical trials to enable consistent, accurate, and complete data collection. Site personnel should be trained on study-specific as well as technology-specific topics and be given instructions on whom to contact to obtain technical support. Optimal training takes place over time using multiple modalities, including hands-on, face-to-face training at an investigator meeting or directly in the clinical site; remote training via webinar or teleconference; interactive on-demand self-paced-training via e-learning modalities; and supplemented by proxy training performed by study clinical research associates. Like site personnel training, study participants should be provided with individual, hands-on training by site staff at the initiation of the trial and in conjunction with interactive electronic training modules that can be accessed on-demand throughout the duration of the trial. The recommendations put forth in this paper provide a structured framework for the training that site personnel and study participants need to optimize the advantages trials can gain from using ePRO data collection systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  best practices; ePRO technology system; electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO); site staff training; study participant training

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30221997     DOI: 10.1177/2168479018796206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ther Innov Regul Sci        ISSN: 2168-4790            Impact factor:   1.778


  2 in total

1.  Developing a Mobile Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Administration System to Capture Postradiation Toxicity in Oncology: Usability and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Jody Underwood; Ann Raldow; Amar Kishan; Chad Zalkin; Lisa Scott Holt; Andrew Webb; Kathleen A Lynch; Thomas M Atkinson; Susan McCloskey; Daniel Navarro
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-04-12

Review 2.  Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Patient-Reported Experience Measures Within Evaluation Studies of Telemedicine Applications: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Andreas Knapp; Lorenz Harst; Stefan Hager; Jochen Schmitt; Madlen Scheibe
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.