| Literature DB >> 30221833 |
Shigehiko Ogoh1, Takuro Washio1, Kazuya Suzuki1, Keisuke Ikeda2, Takaaki Hori2, Niels D Olesen3,4, Yoshiho Muraoka5.
Abstract
Leg immersion in carbonated water improves endothelial-mediated vasodilator function and decreases arterial stiffness but the mechanism underlying this effect remains poorly defined. We hypothesized that carbonated water immersion increases muscle blood flow. To test this hypothesis, 10 men (age 21 ± 0 years; mean ± SD) underwent lower leg immersion in tap or carbonated water at 38°C. We evaluated gastrocnemius muscle oxyhemoglobin concentration and tissue oxygenation index using near-infrared spectroscopy, skin blood flow by laser Doppler flowmetry, and popliteal artery (PA) blood flow by duplex ultrasound. Immersion in carbonated, but not tap water elevated PA (from 38 ± 14 to 83 ± 31 mL/min; P < 0.001) and skin blood flow (by 779 ± 312%, P < 0.001). In contrast, lower leg immersion elevated oxyhemoglobin concentration and tissue oxygenation index with no effect of carbonation (P = 0.529 and P = 0.495). In addition, the change in PA blood flow in response to immersion in carbonated water correlated with those of skin blood flow (P = 0.005) but not oxyhemoglobin concentration (P = 0.765) and tissue oxygenation index (P = 0.136) while no relations was found for tap water immersion. These findings indicate that water carbonation has minimal effect on muscle blood flow. Furthermore, PA blood flow increases in response to lower leg immersion in carbonated water likely due to a large increase in skin blood flow.Entities:
Keywords: Carbonated water; Doppler ultrasound; near-infrared spectroscopy; popliteal artery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30221833 PMCID: PMC6139710 DOI: 10.14814/phy2.13859
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Physiol Rep ISSN: 2051-817X
Figure 1(A) Setup of the lower‐leg water immersion (A) and Experimental protocol (B).
Hemodynamic variables during lower‐leg immersion in tap and carbonated water at 38°C
| Tap water | Carbonated water |
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre | Immersion | Pre | Immersion | Condition | Time | Interaction | |
| Hemodynamic | |||||||
| Heart rate (bpm) | 73 ± 9 | 72 ± 9 | 73 ± 9 | 72 ± 9 | 0.828 | 0.245 | 0.567 |
| Mean arterial pressure (mmHg) | 85 ± 8 | 88 ± 10 | 86 ± 9 | 85 ± 10 | 0.595 | 0.297 | 0.018 |
| Stroke volume (mL) | 82 ± 15 | 83 ± 15 | 82 ± 12 | 84 ± 15 | 0.693 | 0.121 | 0.546 |
| Cardiac output (L/min) | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 5.9 ± 1.0 | 5.9 ± 0.90 | 6 ± 1.10 | 0.658 | 0.612 | 0.260 |
| SkBF (AU) | 9.4 ± 2 | 16.6 ± 8 | 7.9 ± 2 | 64.3 ± 34.9 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
| CVC (AU/mmHg) | 0.11 ± 0 03 | 0.19 ± 0.1 | 0.09 ± 0.02 | 0.77 ± 0.46 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 |
|
| 28 ± 1 | 37 ± 0 | 28 ± 1 | 37 ± 0 | 0.751 | <0.001 | 0.747 |
| VAShot | 4.6 ± 2.4 | 4.2 ± 1.7 | 4.0 ± 2.0 | 3.7 ± 2.1 | 0.195 | 0.461 | 1.000 |
| NIRS (gastrocnemius muscle) | |||||||
| HbO2 ( | 0.44 ± 0.08 | 0.52 ± 0.1 | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 0.52 ± 0.11 | 0.529 | 0.012 | 0.477 |
| HHb ( | 0.47 ± 0.11 | 0.45 ± 0.13 | 0.48 ± 0.13 | 0.42 ± 0.13 | 0.503 | 0.004 | 0.058 |
| TOI (%) | 49 ± 6 | 54 ± 7 | 48 ± 6 | 56 ± 7 | 0.495 | 0.004 | 0.115 |
| Duplex ultrasound (popliteal artery) | |||||||
| Blood velocity (cm/sec) | 3.6 ± 1.8 | 4.3 ± 1.6 | 3.0 ± 1.6 | 6.5 ± 3.3 | 0.194 | <0.001 | 0.01 |
| Diameter (cm) | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.53 ± 0.06 | 0.54 ± 0.06 | 0.912 | 0.285 | 0.426 |
| Blood flow (mL/min) | 48 ± 25 | 57 ± 17 | 38 ± 14 | 83 ± 31 | 0.273 | <0.001 | 0.005 |
| Condactance (mL/min/ mmHg) | 0.58 ± 0.32 | 0.65 ± 0.22 | 0.45 ± 0.17 | 0.99 ± 0.40 | 0.293 | <0.001 | 0.006 |
Values are means ± SD; n = 10 (n = 7 for NIRS variables). SkBF, skin blood flow; CVC, cutaneous vascular conductance; T sk, skin temperature; VAShot, visual analog scale of how hot the subject felt; NIRS, Near infrared spectroscopy; HbO2, oxyhemoglobin concentration; HHb, deoxyhemoglobin concentration; TOI, tissue oxygenation index. *P < 0.05 vs. preimmersion; # P < 0.05 carbonated vs. tap water.
Figure 2Relationship between changes in popliteal artery blood flow and skin blood flow (A) and cutaneous vascular conductance (B) during immersion in tap (●) and carbonated water (○).
Figure 3Relationship between changes in popliteal artery blood flow and muscle oxyhemoglobin concentration (A) and muscle tissue oxygenation index (B) during immersion in tap (●) and carbonated water (○).