Literature DB >> 30221624

A control-theoretic system identification framework and a real-time closed-loop clinical simulation testbed for electrical brain stimulation.

Yuxiao Yang1, Allison T Connolly, Maryam M Shanechi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Closed-loop electrical brain stimulation systems may enable a precisely-tailored treatment for neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders by controlling the stimulation based on neural activity feedback in real time. Developing model-based closed-loop systems requires a principled system identification framework to quantify the effect of input stimulation on output neural activity by learning an input-output (IO) dynamic model from data. Further, developing these systems needs a realistic clinical simulation testbed to design and validate the closed-loop controllers derived from the IO models before testing in human patients. APPROACH: First, we design a control-theoretic system identification framework to build dynamic IO models for neural activity that are amenable to closed-loop control design. To enable tractable model-based control, we use a data-driven linear state-space IO model that characterizes the effect of input on neural activity in terms of a low-dimensional hidden neural state. To learn the model parameters, we design a novel input waveform-a pulse train modulated by stochastic binary noise (BN) parameters-that we show is optimal for collecting informative IO datasets in system identification and conforms to clinical safety requirements. Second, we further extend this waveform to a generalized BN (GBN)-modulated waveform to reduce the required system identification time. Third, to enable extensive testing of system identification and closed-loop control, we develop a real-time closed-loop clinical hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) simulation testbed using the [Formula: see text] microelectrode recording and stimulation device, which incorporates stochastic noises, unknown disturbances and stimulation artifacts. Using this testbed, we implement both the system identification and the closed-loop controller by taking control of mood in depression as an example.
RESULTS: Testbed simulation results show that the closed-loop controller designed from IO models identified with the BN-modulated waveform achieves tight control, and performs similar to a controller that knows the true IO model of neural activity. When system identification time is limited, performance is further improved using the GBN-modulated waveform. SIGNIFICANCE: The system identification framework with the new BN-modulated waveform and the clinical HIL simulation testbed can help develop future model-based closed-loop electrical brain stimulation systems for treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30221624     DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/aad1a8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neural Eng        ISSN: 1741-2552            Impact factor:   5.379


  14 in total

Review 1.  Brain-machine interfaces from motor to mood.

Authors:  Maryam M Shanechi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Bubblewrap: Online tiling and real-time flow prediction on neural manifolds.

Authors:  Anne Draelos; Pranjal Gupta; Na Young Jun; Chaichontat Sriworarat; John Pearson
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2021-12

3.  Modeling behaviorally relevant neural dynamics enabled by preferential subspace identification.

Authors:  Omid G Sani; Hamidreza Abbaspourazad; Yan T Wong; Bijan Pesaran; Maryam M Shanechi
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Modelling and prediction of the dynamic responses of large-scale brain networks during direct electrical stimulation.

Authors:  Yuxiao Yang; Shaoyu Qiao; Omid G Sani; J Isaac Sedillo; Breonna Ferrentino; Bijan Pesaran; Maryam M Shanechi
Journal:  Nat Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 25.671

5.  Signal recovery from stimulation artifacts in intracranial recordings with dictionary learning.

Authors:  D J Caldwell; J A Cronin; R P N Rao; K L Collins; K E Weaver; A L Ko; J G Ojemann; J N Kutz; B W Brunton
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Adaptive delivery of continuous and delayed feedback deep brain stimulation - a computational study.

Authors:  Oleksandr V Popovych; Peter A Tass
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Neuroscience: Behavioral Neurostimulation.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Fellous; Guillermo Sapiro; Andrew Rossi; Helen Mayberg; Michele Ferrante
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  Simulation of Closed-Loop Deep Brain Stimulation Control Schemes for Suppression of Pathological Beta Oscillations in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  John E Fleming; Eleanor Dunn; Madeleine M Lowery
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-05       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Models of communication and control for brain networks: distinctions, convergence, and future outlook.

Authors:  Pragya Srivastava; Erfan Nozari; Jason Z Kim; Harang Ju; Dale Zhou; Cassiano Becker; Fabio Pasqualetti; George J Pappas; Danielle S Bassett
Journal:  Netw Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-01

10.  Digital Cardiovascular Biomarker Responses to Transcutaneous Cervical Vagus Nerve Stimulation: State-Space Modeling, Prediction, and Simulation.

Authors:  Asim H Gazi; Nil Z Gurel; Kristine L S Richardson; Matthew T Wittbrodt; Amit J Shah; Viola Vaccarino; J Douglas Bremner; Omer T Inan
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 4.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.