Literature DB >> 30221489

Use of Wearable Activity Trackers to Improve Physical Activity Behavior in Patients With Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Thomas Davergne1, Adrien Pallot2, Agnès Dechartres3, Bruno Fautrel4, Laure Gossec4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Wearable activity trackers (WATs) could be a promising strategy to improve physical activity in patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs). The aim was to assess the adherence to and effectiveness of WATs to increase physical activity levels in patients with RMDs.
METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify all cohorts and controlled trials evaluating WATs in patients with RMDs, published between 2000 and 2018, by searching Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane. Data collected pertained to adherence, effectiveness on physical activity, or effectiveness on symptoms (pain, function, quality of life, or fatigue). Meta-analyses were performed with a random effects model.
RESULTS: Of 2,806 references, 17 studies were included, with a total of 1,588 patients: 8 studies (47%) in osteoarthritis, 5 (29%) in low-back pain, and 3 (18%) in inflammatory arthritis. Adherence assessed in 4 studies was high (weighted mean ± SD time worn was 92.7% ± 4.6%). A significant increase in physical activity was noted (mean difference 1,520 steps [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 580, 2,460], I² = 77%; or 16 minutes [95% CI 2, 29] of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, I² = 0%). A significant increase in pain was found for long interventions (>8 weeks) (standardized mean difference 0.25 [95% CI 0.07, 0.43], I² = 0%).
CONCLUSION: WATs in patients with RMDs had a high short-term adherence, with a significant increase in the number of steps and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity, although pain should be monitored. WATs may be an effective option to increase physical activity in this at-risk population.
© 2018, American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30221489     DOI: 10.1002/acr.23752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  18 in total

1.  A Feasibility Study for Teaching Older Kidney Transplant Recipients How to Wear and Use an Activity Tracker to Promote Daily Physical Activity.

Authors:  Tara O'Brien; Tess Meyer
Journal:  Nephrol Nurs J       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 0.959

2.  Physical activity patterns, adherence to using a wearable activity tracker during a 12-week period and correlation between self-reported function and physical activity in working age individuals with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Elin Östlind; Anita Sant'Anna; Frida Eek; Kjerstin Stigmar; Eva Ekvall Hansson
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 3.  Wearable Devices: Current Status and Opportunities in Pain Assessment and Management.

Authors:  Andrew Leroux; Rachael Rzasa-Lynn; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Tushar Sharma
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-04-19

Review 4.  Tailored physical activity behavior change interventions: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Jasmin K Ma; Theresa A Floegel; Linda C Li; Jenny Leese; Mary A De Vera; Mark R Beauchamp; Jack Taunton; Teresa Liu-Ambrose; Kelli D Allen
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.626

Review 5.  The Effectiveness of Wearable Devices as Physical Activity Interventions for Preventing and Treating Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wentao Wang; Jing Cheng; Weijun Song; Yi Shen
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 4.947

6.  Patterns of Use and Key Predictors for the Use of Wearable Health Care Devices by US Adults: Insights from a National Survey.

Authors:  Ranganathan Chandrasekaran; Vipanchi Katthula; Evangelos Moustakas
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-16       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Experiences of Wearable Technology by Persons with Knee Osteoarthritis Participating in a Physical Activity Counseling Intervention: Qualitative Study Using a Relational Ethics Lens.

Authors:  Jenny Leese; Graham MacDonald; Catherine L Backman; Anne Townsend; Laura Nimmon; Linda C Li
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.773

8.  Physical activity measured using wearable activity tracking devices associated with gout flares.

Authors:  Nada Elmagboul; Brian W Coburn; Jeffrey Foster; Amy Mudano; Joshua Melnick; Debra Bergman; Shuo Yang; Lang Chen; Cooper Filby; Ted R Mikuls; Jeffrey R Curtis; Kenneth Saag
Journal:  Arthritis Res Ther       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 5.156

Review 9.  Fitbit-Based Interventions for Healthy Lifestyle Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Mickael Ringeval; Gerit Wagner; James Denford; Guy Paré; Spyros Kitsiou
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 5.428

Review 10.  Wearable Activity Trackers in the Management of Rheumatic Diseases: Where Are We in 2020?

Authors:  Thomas Davergne; Antsa Rakotozafiarison; Hervé Servy; Laure Gossec
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.