G Glover1, R Williams2, G Tompkins3, J Oyinlola2. 1. Public Health England Learning Disabilities Observatory, West Wing, Victoria House, Capital Park, Fulbourn, Cambridge, UK. 2. Clinical Practice Research Datalink Group, Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency, London, UK. 3. Public Health in Gateshead, Gateshead Council, Gateshead, UK.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Providing safe, high-quality admitted-patient care for people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) requires consideration for their special needs particularly in relation to communication and consent. To make allowance for these special requirements, it would be helpful for hospitals to know how often they are likely to arise. This study set out to identify the amount and patterns of use of acute, non-psychiatric hospital admitted-patient care in England by people with ID. Patterns are considered in relation to clinical specialties, modes of admission (emergency or planned) and life stages (children and young people, working age and older adults). In each case, patterns for people with ID are compared with patterns for those without. METHODS: Descriptive observational study using a major general practitioner (GP) research database (Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD) linked to routine national statistical records of admitted-patient care. RESULTS: Overall people identified by their GP as having ID had higher rates of admitted-patient care episodes and longer durations of stay than those without. Differences varied considerably between clinical specialties with rates more elevated in medical and paediatric than surgical specialties. Admitted-patient care rates for women with ID in obstetrics and gynaecology were lower than for other women, while rates for admitted-patient dental care were much higher for both men and women with ID. In an average English health administrative area with a local population of 250 000 people, at any time, there are likely to be approximately 670 people receiving acute admitted-patient care. Approximately six of these are likely to have been identified by their GP as having ID. At 0.9% of hospital in-patients, this is just under twice the proportion in the population. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our figures are likely to be an underestimate as GP identification of people with ID is known to be far from complete. However, they indicate that the number of people with ID in acute hospital settings is likely to be substantially more than a recent survey of English health services indicated they were aware of. The study is intended to help guide expectations for acute hospitals seeking to audit the completeness of their identification of people with ID and to indicate their likely distribution between clinical specialties.
INTRODUCTION: Providing safe, high-quality admitted-patient care for people with intellectual disabilities (IDs) requires consideration for their special needs particularly in relation to communication and consent. To make allowance for these special requirements, it would be helpful for hospitals to know how often they are likely to arise. This study set out to identify the amount and patterns of use of acute, non-psychiatric hospital admitted-patient care in England by people with ID. Patterns are considered in relation to clinical specialties, modes of admission (emergency or planned) and life stages (children and young people, working age and older adults). In each case, patterns for people with ID are compared with patterns for those without. METHODS: Descriptive observational study using a major general practitioner (GP) research database (Clinical Practice Research Datalink GOLD) linked to routine national statistical records of admitted-patient care. RESULTS: Overall people identified by their GP as having ID had higher rates of admitted-patient care episodes and longer durations of stay than those without. Differences varied considerably between clinical specialties with rates more elevated in medical and paediatric than surgical specialties. Admitted-patient care rates for women with ID in obstetrics and gynaecology were lower than for other women, while rates for admitted-patient dental care were much higher for both men and women with ID. In an average English health administrative area with a local population of 250 000 people, at any time, there are likely to be approximately 670 people receiving acute admitted-patient care. Approximately six of these are likely to have been identified by their GP as having ID. At 0.9% of hospital in-patients, this is just under twice the proportion in the population. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Our figures are likely to be an underestimate as GP identification of people with ID is known to be far from complete. However, they indicate that the number of people with ID in acute hospital settings is likely to be substantially more than a recent survey of English health services indicated they were aware of. The study is intended to help guide expectations for acute hospitals seeking to audit the completeness of their identification of people with ID and to indicate their likely distribution between clinical specialties.
Authors: Laurel Mimmo; Susan Woolfenden; Joanne Travaglia; Iva Strnadová; Maya Tokutake And Karen Phillips; Matthew And Debbie van Hoek; Reema Harrison Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-12-06 Impact factor: 2.692