| Literature DB >> 30221227 |
Jin Liu1, Yu-Ling Wang2, Ji-Hong Zhang2, Jian-Shan Yang1, Han-Chuan Mou2, Jun Lin1, Sheng-Jiao Yan1.
Abstract
An efficient, environmentally benign, and inexpensive procedure has been developed for the synthesis of fluorinated 2-alkylthio-4-aminoquinazolines by microwave irradiation using basic alumina as a solid-support agent as well as a solid base. Notably, this protocol features improved energy efficiency, broad isothiourea substrate scope, easily available starting materials, and high atom efficiency and applicability toward gram-scale synthesis. Additionally, the target compounds were evaluated for the cytotoxic effect against human colon adenocarcinoma (HCT116 and HT29), human gastric cancer (SGC-7901), human lung adenocarcinoma (A549), and human hepatocyte carcinoma (HepG2) cells, and it was found that these compounds have excellent antitumor activities. Among them, compound 3e was found to be one of the most potent derivatives with IC50 values lower than 9.44 μM against five human tumor cell lines, making it more active than cisplatin (DDP). Furthermore, for the first time, the fluorinated 2-alkylthio-substituted 4-aminoquinazolines were identified as phosphatase CDC25B inhibitors.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30221227 PMCID: PMC6130795 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.8b00640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Biologically active 4-aminoquinazolines and targeted compounds.
Scheme 1Mechanism Hypotheses for the Synthesis of Target Compounds 3
Optimization of the Reaction Condition
| entry | solvent or solid support | base | time (min) | yield | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | DMSO | K2CO3 | 120 | 240 | 48 |
| 2 | CH3CN | K2CO3 | reflux | 300 | 33 |
| 3 | 1,4-dioxane | K2CO3 | reflux | 240 | 50 |
| 4 | 1,4-dioxane | reflux | 180 | 23 | |
| 5 | 1,4-dioxane | Cs2CO3 | reflux | 240 | 52 |
| 6 | 1,4-dioxane | reflux | 300 | N.R. | |
| 8 | Al2O3 (basic, 3 g) | 80 (MW) | 20 | 77 | |
| 9 | Al2O3 (basic, 2 g) | 80 (MW) | 20 | 80 | |
| 10 | Al2O3 (basic, 2 g) | 80 | 360 | 61 | |
| 11 | silica gel | 120 (MW) | 20 | N.R. | |
| 12 | neutral alumina | 120 (MW) | 20 | N.R. |
Conventional reaction conditions: the reaction was carried out using 2,4,5,6-tetrafluoroisophthalonitrile 1a (1.0 mmol), S-butyl isothiourea hydrobromide 2a (1.3 mmol), base (1.0 mmol), and solvent (10 mL).
Microwave-assisted reaction conditions: a mixture of 1a (1 mmol) and 2a (1.3 mmol) was adsorbed on a solid support (2 or 3 g) with the help of ethanol. The reaction mixture was irradiated in a microwave reactor (600 W).
Microwave-assisted reaction conditions: a mixture of 1a (1 mmol) and 2a (1.5 mmol) was adsorbed on a solid support (2 or 3 g) with the help of ethanol. The reaction mixture was irradiated in a microwave reactor (600 W).
The reaction was performed in an oil bath.
Isolated yield based on 1a.
Preparation of 2-Alkylthio-4-aminoquinazolinesa,b3a–3x
Reaction conditions: a mixture of polyfluoro benzenedicarbonitriles 1 (1.0 mmol) and isothiouronium salts 2 (1.3 mmol) was adsorbed on a solid support (2 g) with the help of ethanol. The reaction mixture was irradiated in a microwave reactor.
Isolated yield based on 1.
Preparation of 2-Alkylthio-4-aminoquinazolinesa,b3y–3c′
Reaction conditions: a mixture of tetrafluoroterephthalonitrile 1c (1.0 mmol) and isothiouronium salts 2 (1.3 mmol) was adsorbed on a solid support (2 g) with the help of ethanol. The reaction mixture was irradiated in a microwave reactor.
Isolated yield based on 1c.
Figure 2X-ray crystal structure of 3e (ellipsoids are drawn at the 30% probability level).
Scheme 2Mechanism Hypotheses for the Synthesis of Target Compounds 3
Cytotoxic Activities of Target Compounds 3 in Vitroa (IC50, μMb)
| no. | compd. | HCT116 | HT29 | SGC7901 | A549 | HepG2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.32 | 8.00 | 11.63 | 41.07 | 34.08 | |
| 2 | 16.03 | 59.36 | 30.36 | >100 | 69.50 | |
| 3 | 55.05 | >100 | 73.46 | >100 | >100 | |
| 4 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | >100 | |
| 5 | ||||||
| 6 | 5.08 | 6.77 | 6.65 | 12.27 | 23.94 | |
| 7 | 5.55 | 4.93 | 5.68 | 6.50 | 14.89 | |
| 8 | 5.68 | 6.35 | 5.84 | 6.03 | 14.91 | |
| 9 | 6.94 | 7.97 | 7.34 | 7.48 | 34.03 | |
| 10 | 5.68 | 9.62 | 12.16 | 26.40 | 24.11 | |
| 11 | 4.39 | 6.87 | 5.45 | 6.00 | 26.12 | |
| 12 | 5.02 | 14.23 | 6.34 | 18.82 | 31.64 | |
| 13 | 4.89 | 6.06 | 6.26 | 24.80 | 12.25 | |
| 14 | 6.71 | 35.52 | 25.01 | 65.02 | 48.93 | |
| 15 | 3.84 | 5.80 | 5.89 | 26.42 | 6.41 | |
| 16 | ||||||
| 17 | 9.32 | 35.68 | 20.97 | 70.53 | 51.79 | |
| 18 | cisplatin (DDP) | 8.74 | 12.78 | 11.00 | 15.31 | 9.94 |
Cytotoxicity as IC50 for each cell line is the concentration of compound which reduced by 50% the optical density of treated cells with respect to untreated cells using the 3-[4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2, 5 diphenyl tetrazolium bromide assay.
Data represent the mean values of three independent determinations.
Scheme 3Structure–Activity Relationship of 2-Alkythio-4-aminoquinazolines 3
Inhibition of Target Compounds against CDC25B
| entry | compound | CDC25B inhibition rate/% | CDC25B IC50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.32 ± 1.25 | N.D. | |
| 2 | 99.55 ± 0.13 | 0.45 ± 0.04 | |
| 3 | 99.74 ± 0.12 | 2.67 ± 0.29 | |
| 4 | 97.31 ± 0.29 | 1.04 ± 0.02 | |
| 5 | 55.11 ± 1.72 | N.D. | |
| 6 | 89.73 ± 1.14 | N.D. | |
| 7 | 3.30 ± 1.55 | N.D. | |
| 8 | 20.44 ± 8.93 | N.D. | |
| 9 | 96.59 ± 0.68 | 1.24 ± 0.18 | |
| 10 | 98.64 ± 0.10 | 0.76 ± 0.15 | |
| 11 | 99.88 ± 0.11 | 1.50 ± 0.15 | |
| 12 | 78.25 ± 3.26 | N.D. | |
| 13 | 99.64 ± 0.10 | 1.39 ± 0.25 | |
| 14 | |||
| 15 | 80.39 ± 4.39 | N.D. | |
| 16 | 73.75 ± 5.23 | N.D. | |
| 17 | 96.33 ± 0.16 | 1.35 ± 0.19 | |
| 18 | 99.65 ± 0.01 | 0.93 ± 0.17 | |
| 19 | 99.59 ± 0.24 | 0.97 ± 0.10 | |
| 20 | 97.28 ± 0.16 | 0.42 ± 0.05 | |
| 21 | 83.27 ± 1.22 | N.D. | |
| 22 | 2.11 ± 2.74 | N.D. | |
| 23 | 99.40 ± 0.09 | 0.47 ± 0.02 | |
| 24 | 93.95 ± 1.03 | 0.58 ± 0.03 | |
| 25 | 96.64 ± 0.40 | 2.12 ± 0.10 | |
| 26 | 78.03 ± 1.97 | N.D. | |
| 27 | 63.42 ± 3.14 | N.D. | |
| 28 | 98.21 ± 0.04 | 2.42 ± 0.16 | |
| 29 | 99.04 ± 0.06 | 0.85 ± 0.05 | |
| 30 | Na3VO4 | N.D. | 0.13 ± 0.02 |
Inhibition % at 20 μg/mL concentration.
IC50 value: substance concentration necessary for 50% inhibition of CDC25B viability.
N.D. not determined.
Figure 3(a) Untreated cells were used as controls; (b,c) compounds 3j and 3n induce G1 phase arrest; and (d) 3w induces G2-M phase arrest in HTC116 cells. Cells were treated with 1.02 μM of compounds 3j and 3n and 2.56 μM of compound 3w for 24 h. The cell cycle was determined by DAPI staining and analyzed with a GE IN cell 2200 cell imaging system.
Percentages of Cells in Different Phases Were Quantified
| cells
(%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| treatment | G1 | S | G2/M |
| DMSO | 38.64 | 12.82 | 33.13 |
| compd. | 49.55 | 7.55 | 29.95 |
| compd. | 47.73 | 8.33 | 31.06 |
| compd. | 25.23 | 11.10 | 51.84 |
Figure 4Effect of compounds 3j, 3n, and 3w on CDK1 phosphorylation status.