Literature DB >> 30221064

High-dimensional mass cytometry analysis revealed microenvironment complexity in chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Marina Wierz1, Bassam Janji1, Guy Berchem1,2, Etienne Moussay1, Jerome Paggetti1.   

Abstract

In this study, we extensively dissected the phenotypic complexity of the splenic tumor microenvironment (TME) in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) by high-dimensional mass cytometry (CyTOF). As a result, we identified potential new targets and tested a dual immune checkpoint blockade targeting the TME in pre-clinical mouse models of CLL.

Entities:  

Keywords:  chronic lymphocytic leukemia; immune-checkpoint blockade; immunotherapy; mass cytometry; tumor microenvironment

Year:  2018        PMID: 30221064      PMCID: PMC6136877          DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1465167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncoimmunology        ISSN: 2162-4011            Impact factor:   8.110


The progression of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), the most frequent leukemia in adults, is highly dependent on complex interactions with cells populating the CLL tumor microenvironment (TME), which is associated with dysfunctional anti-tumor immunity.[1] To escape surveillance by the immune system, tumor cells are able to co-opt multiple immunosuppressive pathways[2],[3] such as the engagement of immune checkpoints that prevents an effective anti-tumor immunity. Immunotherapy aims to stimulate anti-tumor activity by reactivating the immune system. Recently, immune checkpoints blockade showed promising results in a mouse preclinical model of CLL.[4] Despite recent advances in treatments, CLL remains an incurable disease. Therefore, finding specific targets and combining immunotherapy approaches represent new challenges for efficient CLL treatment. As first CyTOF (Cytometry by Time Of Flight) study in CLL, we deeply characterized the splenic CLL microenvironment by high-resolution mass cytometry using a custom 35-marker panel (Fig. 1A). Over the last years, mass cytometry emerged as a new technology for high-dimensional multi-parameter single cell analysis that overcomes the limitations of conventional flow cytometry. By using antibodies labeled with heavy-metal isotopes instead of fluorescent tags, mass cytometry enables the simultaneous quantification of multiple surface and intracellular proteins and thus provides the most comprehensive understanding of the cellular phenotypic signature within the TME. For example, mass cytometry enabled the identification of specific cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) subsets in human breast cancer[5] as well as the analysis of immune responses in several tissues after immunotherapy in genetically-engineered cancer models.[6] However, interpretation of the complex cytometry data remains challenging and requires tools that capture the multi-parametric relationship of cells.
Figure 1.

Mass cytometry analysis of the CLL microenvironment before and after dual PD1/LAG3 blockade. (A) High-dimensional single-cell mass cytometry of the splenic immune infiltrate in CLL was performed to dissect the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME). (B) Mass cytometry revealed relevant alterations in the composition of the splenic CLL TME, the upregulation of immune checkpoints and other specific surface molecules (colored boxes), as well as cytokines. Enhanced PD1/PD-L1 and LAG3/MHC II signaling in the CLL TME leads to cellular activation (green arrows) or inhibition (red arrows) of target cells depending on cell types resulting in an immuno-suppressive microenvironment. (C) Dual immune checkpoint blockade (anti-PD1/anti-LAG3) resolved alterations induced by CLL and restored an immuno-competent microenvironment with an effective anti-tumor immune response.

Mass cytometry analysis of the CLL microenvironment before and after dual PD1/LAG3 blockade. (A) High-dimensional single-cell mass cytometry of the splenic immune infiltrate in CLL was performed to dissect the complexity of the tumor microenvironment (TME). (B) Mass cytometry revealed relevant alterations in the composition of the splenic CLL TME, the upregulation of immune checkpoints and other specific surface molecules (colored boxes), as well as cytokines. Enhanced PD1/PD-L1 and LAG3/MHC II signaling in the CLL TME leads to cellular activation (green arrows) or inhibition (red arrows) of target cells depending on cell types resulting in an immuno-suppressive microenvironment. (C) Dual immune checkpoint blockade (anti-PD1/anti-LAG3) resolved alterations induced by CLL and restored an immuno-competent microenvironment with an effective anti-tumor immune response. To establish an extensive cartography of immune cell subsets populating the leukemic spleen, we combined multiple tools as viSNE (visualization for high-dimensional single-cell data based on the t-Distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding (t-SNE) algorithm) and SPADE (SPAnning tree progression of Density normalized Events) to provide a comprehensive view of the data, and more especially to facilitate statistical comparison of cell populations (SPADE) while maintaining single-cell resolution (viSNE) (Fig. 1A). We observed that malignant CLL cells, when compared to normal B cells, show a higher expression of Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG3) immune checkpoints as well as several maturation and adhesion molecules such as CD44 and ICAM-1. Furthermore, PD-L1 expression was heterogeneous on CLL cells, a high expression being concomitant with a higher expression of maturation and adhesion molecules. Excluding B cells from our analysis pipeline, we identified a significant alteration in the immune cell composition in CLL that is associated with strong immune suppression (Fig. 1B). More particularly, we revealed a significant enrichment of CD8+ T cell subpopulations displaying features of exhaustion such as the expression of the immune checkpoints PD1, LAG3, T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin-domain containing-3 (TIM3) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated Protein 4 (CTLA4). Our analysis revealed as well an expansion of two subsets of activated regulatory T cells (Treg) expressing PD1, LAG3, CTLA4 and killer-cell lectin-like receptor G1 (KLRG1), both described to have enhanced suppressive capacities.[7] Concerning the myeloid compartment, tolerogenic CD8+ dendritic cells also expressing immune checkpoints such as LAG3 or TIM3 as well as PECAM-1+ PD-L1+ patrolling (PAT) monocytes[8] were enriched in CLL. Overall, we recognized an upregulation of PD1 and LAG3 on the majority of immune cell populations in CLL TME. This is particularly relevant as both PD-L1 and MHC II, the ligands for PD1 and LAG3, respectively, are expressed by CLL cells and monocytes thus indicating enhanced PD1/PD-L1 and LAG3/MHC II signaling in the CLL microenvironment. Therefore, we evaluated a dual anti-PD1/anti-LAG3 immunotherapy in preclinical mouse models of CLL. Indeed, dual PD1/LAG3 blockade efficiently limited CLL development and restored an immuno-competent microenvironment as identified by mass cytometry (Fig. 1C). Additionally, the cytokine profile in serum after dual checkpoint blockade was comparable to healthy controls and showed the restoration of an effective immune response illustrated by increased levels of IL-2, IL-23, TNF-α, and CCL1. Some checkpoint blockades such as anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD1 are already approved and show beneficial effects in the treatment of melanoma[9] and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).[10] The number of open clinical trials investigating checkpoint blockade is increasing in hematological malignancies. In particular, PD1 blockade is currently tested as monotherapy or combination therapy with anti-LAG3 in CLL and other B-cell malignancies (ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT02061761). Indeed, the majority of patients do not respond to single-agent therapies, thus highlighting a clinical need to design combination therapeutic approaches for multiple targets. In this study, we demonstrated that a dual anti-PD1/LAG3 therapy is a potential combination that could be beneficial for CLL patients. In conclusion, this study underlines that high-dimensional mass cytometry represents a powerful tool to profile the immune contexture and characterize complex phenotypic populations within a heterogeneous microenvironment to identify potential new therapeutic targets for leukemia treatment. Thus, integration of immune phenotyping appears as a novel branch of precision/targeted medicine in which therapeutic decisions are based on the composition of the TME. Clinically, mass cytometry arises as a new technology allowing rapid implementation and adoption of novel advances in clinical immunology. Importantly and in contrast to a wide array of solid tumors, the TME of hematological malignancies is per se composed of a high number of immune cells and particularly T lymphocytes, and thus can be recognized as a “hot tumor”. Combination immunotherapies appear especially suitable to restore functional anti-tumor immunity and therefore more clinical trials are required to identify and test promising therapies.
  10 in total

1.  The cancer vaccine roller coaster.

Authors:  Bruce Goldman; Laura DeFrancesco
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 2.  Tumor-induced host immunosuppression: special focus on CLL.

Authors:  Christine E Cutucache
Journal:  Int Immunopharmacol       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 4.932

Review 3.  The microenvironment in mature B-cell malignancies: a target for new treatment strategies.

Authors:  Jan A Burger; Paolo Ghia; Andreas Rosenwald; Federico Caligaris-Cappio
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-07-27       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Pembrolizumab for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Edward B Garon; Naiyer A Rizvi; Rina Hui; Natasha Leighl; Ani S Balmanoukian; Joseph Paul Eder; Amita Patnaik; Charu Aggarwal; Matthew Gubens; Leora Horn; Enric Carcereny; Myung-Ju Ahn; Enriqueta Felip; Jong-Seok Lee; Matthew D Hellmann; Omid Hamid; Jonathan W Goldman; Jean-Charles Soria; Marisa Dolled-Filhart; Ruth Z Rutledge; Jin Zhang; Jared K Lunceford; Reshma Rangwala; Gregory M Lubiniecki; Charlotte Roach; Kenneth Emancipator; Leena Gandhi
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Combined Nivolumab and Ipilimumab or Monotherapy in Untreated Melanoma.

Authors:  James Larkin; Vanna Chiarion-Sileni; Rene Gonzalez; Jean Jacques Grob; C Lance Cowey; Christopher D Lao; Dirk Schadendorf; Reinhard Dummer; Michael Smylie; Piotr Rutkowski; Pier F Ferrucci; Andrew Hill; John Wagstaff; Matteo S Carlino; John B Haanen; Michele Maio; Ivan Marquez-Rodas; Grant A McArthur; Paolo A Ascierto; Georgina V Long; Margaret K Callahan; Michael A Postow; Kenneth Grossmann; Mario Sznol; Brigitte Dreno; Lars Bastholt; Arvin Yang; Linda M Rollin; Christine Horak; F Stephen Hodi; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  PD-L1 checkpoint blockade prevents immune dysfunction and leukemia development in a mouse model of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

Authors:  Fabienne McClanahan; Bola Hanna; Shaun Miller; Andrew James Clear; Peter Lichter; John G Gribben; Martina Seiffert
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Systemic Immunity Is Required for Effective Cancer Immunotherapy.

Authors:  Matthew H Spitzer; Yaron Carmi; Nathan E Reticker-Flynn; Serena S Kwek; Deepthi Madhireddy; Maria M Martins; Pier Federico Gherardini; Tyler R Prestwood; Jonathan Chabon; Sean C Bendall; Lawrence Fong; Garry P Nolan; Edgar G Engleman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  CTLA-4 control over Foxp3+ regulatory T cell function.

Authors:  Kajsa Wing; Yasushi Onishi; Paz Prieto-Martin; Tomoyuki Yamaguchi; Makoto Miyara; Zoltan Fehervari; Takashi Nomura; Shimon Sakaguchi
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Fibroblast Heterogeneity and Immunosuppressive Environment in Human Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ana Costa; Yann Kieffer; Alix Scholer-Dahirel; Floriane Pelon; Brigitte Bourachot; Melissa Cardon; Philemon Sirven; Ilaria Magagna; Laetitia Fuhrmann; Charles Bernard; Claire Bonneau; Maria Kondratova; Inna Kuperstein; Andrei Zinovyev; Anne-Marie Givel; Maria-Carla Parrini; Vassili Soumelis; Anne Vincent-Salomon; Fatima Mechta-Grigoriou
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 31.743

10.  Depletion of CLL-associated patrolling monocytes and macrophages controls disease development and repairs immune dysfunction in vivo.

Authors:  B S Hanna; F McClanahan; H Yazdanparast; N Zaborsky; V Kalter; P M Rößner; A Benner; C Dürr; A Egle; J G Gribben; P Lichter; M Seiffert
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 11.528

  10 in total
  7 in total

1.  Intrinsic Resistance of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Cells to NK Cell-Mediated Lysis Can Be Overcome In Vitro by Pharmacological Inhibition of Cdc42-Induced Actin Cytoskeleton Remodeling.

Authors:  Hannah Wurzer; Liza Filali; Céline Hoffmann; Max Krecke; Andrea Michela Biolato; Jérôme Mastio; Sigrid De Wilde; Jean Hugues François; Anne Largeot; Guy Berchem; Jérôme Paggetti; Etienne Moussay; Clément Thomas
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 2.  Hematological Malignancy-Derived Small Extracellular Vesicles and Tumor Microenvironment: The Art of Turning Foes into Friends.

Authors:  Ernesto Gargiulo; Jerome Paggetti; Etienne Moussay
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2019-05-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 3.  Immune Dysfunctions and Immune-Based Therapeutic Interventions in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Valentina Griggio; Francesca Perutelli; Chiara Salvetti; Elia Boccellato; Mario Boccadoro; Candida Vitale; Marta Coscia
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 4.  T-cells in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: Guardians or drivers of disease?

Authors:  Philipp M Roessner; Martina Seiffert
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 11.528

5.  Transcriptome analysis reveals the prognostic and immune infiltration characteristics of glycolysis and hypoxia in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jun Liu; Jianjun Lu; Wenli Li
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  A Specific CD44lo CD25lo Subpopulation of Regulatory T Cells Inhibits Anti-Leukemic Immune Response and Promotes the Progression in a Mouse Model of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Agnieszka Goral; Malgorzata Firczuk; Klaudyna Fidyt; Marta Sledz; Francesca Simoncello; Karolina Siudakowska; Giulia Pagano; Etienne Moussay; Jérôme Paggetti; Patrycja Nowakowska; Stefania Gobessi; Joanna Barankiewicz; Aleksander Salomon-Perzynski; Federica Benvenuti; Dimitar G Efremov; Przemyslaw Juszczynski; Ewa Lech-Maranda; Angelika Muchowicz
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 7.561

7.  Method for the Analysis of the Tumor Microenvironment by Mass Cytometry: Application to Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia.

Authors:  Susanne Gonder; Iria Fernandez Botana; Marina Wierz; Giulia Pagano; Ernesto Gargiulo; Antonio Cosma; Etienne Moussay; Jerome Paggetti; Anne Largeot
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 7.561

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.