Literature DB >> 30220776

A supplementary tool to existing approaches for assessing ecosystem community structure.

Matthew E Hopton1, Arunprakash T Karunanithi2, Ahjond S Garmestani1, Denis White3,4, Jerry R Choate5, Heriberto Cabezas1.   

Abstract

Measures of biological or species diversity are central to ecology and conservation biology. Although there are several commonly used indices, each has shortcomings and all vary in the relative emphasis they place on the number of species and their relative abundance. We propose utilizing Fisher Information, not as a replacement for existing indices, but as a supplement to other indices because it is sensitive to community structure. We demonstrate how Shannon's and Simpson's diversity indices quantify the diversity of two different systems and how Fisher Information can enhance the analyses by comparing, as example, body size, and phylogenetic diversity of the different communities. Fisher Information is sensitive to the order in which species are entered into the analysis, and therefore, it can detect differences in community structure. Thus, the Fisher Information index can be useful in helping understand and analyze biodiversity of ecosystems and in comparing ecological communities.

Keywords:  Fisher Information; Shannon index; Simpson index; biological diversity; community structure; diversity indices; randomization; resampling

Year:  2017        PMID: 30220776      PMCID: PMC6134869          DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2017.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Modell        ISSN: 0304-3800            Impact factor:   2.974


  17 in total

Review 1.  Information theory in ecology.

Authors:  R E Ulanowicz
Journal:  Comput Chem       Date:  2001-07

2.  Removing the confounding effect of habitat specialization reveals the stabilizing contribution of diversity to species variability.

Authors:  Jurek Kolasa; Bai-Lian Li
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  Phylogenetic approaches for describing and comparing the diversity of microbial communities.

Authors:  Andrew P Martin
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  How relevant are the concepts of species diversity and species richness?

Authors:  Laishangbam Sanjit; Dinesh Bhatt
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  Patterns in body mass distributions: sifting among alternative hypotheses.

Authors:  C R Allen; A S Garmestani; T D Havlicek; P A Marquet; G D Peterson; C Restrepo; C A Stow; B E Weeks
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.492

Review 6.  Relationships between body size and abundance in ecology.

Authors:  Ethan P White; S K Morgan Ernest; Andrew J Kerkhoff; Brian J Enquist
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-03-30       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Phylogeny, niches, and relative abundance in natural communities.

Authors:  Colleen K Kelly; Michael G Bowler; Oliver Pybus; Paul H Harvey
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Body size distributions signal a regime shift in a lake ecosystem.

Authors:  Trisha L Spanbauer; Craig R Allen; David G Angeler; Tarsha Eason; Sherilyn C Fritz; Ahjond S Garmestani; Kirsty L Nash; Jeffery R Stone; Craig A Stow; Shana M Sundstrom
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Catastrophic Declines in Wilderness Areas Undermine Global Environment Targets.

Authors:  James E M Watson; Danielle F Shanahan; Moreno Di Marco; James Allan; William F Laurance; Eric W Sanderson; Brendan Mackey; Oscar Venter
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  Terrestrial adaptations in the postcranial skeletons of guenons.

Authors:  D L Gebo; E J Sargis
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.868

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.