| Literature DB >> 30220761 |
Maria Furberg1,2, David M Hondula3,4, Michael V Saha4, Maria Nilsson1.
Abstract
Significant climate change in the Arctic has been observed by indigenous peoples and reported in scientific literature, but there has been little research comparing these two knowledge bases. In this study, Sami reindeer herder interviews and observational weather data were combined to provide a comprehensive description of climate changes in Northern Sweden. The interviewees described warmer winters, shorter snow seasons and cold periods, and increased temperature variability. Weather data supported three of these four observed changes; the only change not evident in the weather data was increased temperature variability. Winter temperatures increased, the number of days in cold periods was significantly reduced, and some stations displayed a 2 month-shorter snow cover season. Interviewees reported that these changes to the wintertime climate are significant, impact their identity, and threaten their livelihood. If consistency between human observations of changing weather patterns and the instrumental meteorological record is observed elsewhere, mixed methods research like this study can produce a clearer, more societally relevant understanding of how the climate is changing and the impacts of those changes on human well-being.Entities:
Keywords: Climate change; Cold spells; Indigenous peoples; Mixed methods; Reindeer herding; Variability
Year: 2018 PMID: 30220761 PMCID: PMC6132962 DOI: 10.1007/s11111-018-0302-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Popul Environ ISSN: 0199-0039
Fig. 1Interviewees’ residences (triangles), Sami village and grazing areas (shaded areas), and weather stations (stars). Cities of Ostersund, Umea, Pitea, and Kiruna marked as reference points. Striped areas mark shared grazing lands. Illustration by www.nopolo.se
Geographic details for the meteorological stations used in this study. Symbols used to represent each station on the map are shown in the first column. The period of record for all stations is 1978–2007
| Symbol | Name | Longitude (°E) | Latitude (°N) | Elevation (m) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARJ | Arjeplog | 17.84 | 66.05 | 431 |
| DVD | Dividalen | 19.71 | 68.78 | 228 |
| FRO | Frösön | 14.49 | 63.20 | 376 |
| GAD | Gaddede | 14.16 | 64.5 | 328 |
| GUN | Gunnarn | 17.71 | 65.01 | 280 |
| JUN | Junsele | 16.95 | 63.68 | 215 |
| KVK | Kvikkjokk | 18.02 | 66.89 | 314 |
| LUL | Lulea | 22.12 | 65.54 | 17 |
| PAJ | Pajala | 23.39 | 67.21 | 168 |
| STO | Storlien | 12.13 | 63.30 | 642 |
Linear regression trend, percent of the variance in the time series explained, and p value of the trend line, for the start date, end date, and duration of the snow season at each station in the study region, 1978–2007
| Snow season start date | Snow season end date | Snow season duuration | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trend (days/year) | Variance explained (%) | Trend (days/year) | Variance explained (%) | Trend (days/year) | Variance explained (%) | ||||
| ARJ | 0.46 | 1.7 | 0.578 | 0.59 | 18.2 | 0.060 | 0.13 | 0.1 | 0.893 |
| DVD | 0.18 | 0.1 | 0.882 | − 0.73 | 7.9 | 0.244 | − 0.91 | 2.4 | 0.528 |
| FRO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GAD |
|
|
| − 0.21 | 4.2 | 0.303 |
|
|
|
| GUN |
|
|
| − 0.70 | 18.3 | 0.026 |
|
|
|
| JUN |
|
|
| − 0.33 | 5.5 | 0.260 |
|
|
|
| KVK |
|
|
| − 0.27 | 8.6 | 0.130 |
|
|
|
| LUL |
|
|
| − 0.14 | 5.1 | 0.258 |
|
|
|
| PAJ | 0.07 | 0.1 | 0.882 | − 0.28 | 9.1 | 0.111 | − 0.35 | 1.3 | 0.559 |
| STO | 0.09 | 0.5 | 0.729 | − 0.06 | 0.3 | 0.789 | − 0.15 | 0.7 | 0.673 |
Statistically significant trends (increasing or decreasing, p < 0.05) are highlighted with italic text
Fig. 2Annual count of the length of the season with 25 mm or more of snow cover observed consecutively at Gunnarn, 1978–2007. The solid line indicates the statistically significantly (p < 0.05) best-fit least-squares linear regression trend. Note: Snow cover observations were incomplete for winter 1988-1989 at this station; this year was assigned a missing value for regression analysis
Fig. 3Trends in each percentile of daily minimum (a) and maximum (b) temperature at each station in the study region, 1978–2007. Only statistically significant trends (p < 0.05) are shown on the plot. Color bars on the bottom of the figure indicate approximate segments of the temperature distribution corresponding to each season of the year
Slope and statistical significance of Poisson (log-linear) regression models of the trend in the number of days per year in extended cold periods at study stations, 1978–2007
| Days per year in extended cold periods | ||
|---|---|---|
| Trend log (days/year) | ||
| ARJ |
|
|
| DVD | − 0.012 | 0.424 |
| FRO |
|
|
| GAD |
|
|
| GUN |
|
|
| JUN |
|
|
| KVK |
|
|
| LUL |
|
|
| PAJ |
|
|
| STO |
|
|
Rows in the table with statistically significant trends (p < 0.05) are highlighted in italics
Fig. 4Time series of the number of days per year classified as parts of extended cold periods at Storlien, 1978–2007. The solid line indicates a statistically significant trend for a log-linear regression model relating time to the number of extended cold period days per year
Fig. 5Trends in each percentile of day-to-day changes in minimum (a) and maximum (b) temperature. Only statistically significant trends (p < 0.05) are shown on the plot. For reference, the 100th percentile corresponds to the largest observed temperature increase from one day to the next, whereas the 1stpercentile corresponds to the largest observed temperature decrease from one day to the text
Counts of the number of stations in the study region (out of 10) where the 5-day temperature range statistically significantly increased (lefthand column) or decreased (right hand columns) within each calendar month, 1978–2007. Counts are shown for four specific percentiles of 5-day temperature range
| Number of stations with increasing ranges | Number of stations with decreasing ranges | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | 75th Percentile | 90th Percentile | 99th Percentile | Median | 75th Percentile | 90th Percentile | 99th Percentile | |
| Jan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 0 |
| Feb | 0 | 0 |
| 0 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Apr | 0 | 0 |
|
| 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| May | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jun | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jul |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Aug |
|
|
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sep |
|
|
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Oct | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nov | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
| Dec | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|
|
|
|
All cases where at least one station reported a statistically significant trend are shown in italics
Summary of observations and representative quotes of the Sami reindeer herding population that were used to formulate the quantitative stand of the project, along with the specific metrics used in the quantitative analysis and subsequent results
| Observations | Illustrative quotes | Quantitative test | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| O1. The snow season is beginning later and ending sooner. Snow seasons are shorter | “And already in March the spring starts and in April with bare spots and everything. It wasn’t like that when I grew up, back then there were no bare spots until way into may” | Start date, end date, and duration of snow season | Claim supported in terms of the sign of the trend, statistical significance weak. In 28 of 30 test performances, the sign of the trend was consistent with perceptions, 14 of 30 trends were significant |
| O2. Wintertime temperatures are increasing | “... The winters feel much warmer” | Changes in temperature distributions | Claim strongly supported including statistically significant trends in winter temperature percentiles |
| O3. Long, stable, cold periods are becoming less common | “According to the interviewees, the long stable cold periods often do not occur at all ...” | Number of days each year in cold events (mean temperature < 25th percentile) lasting 10 days or more | Claim strongly supported. Claim strongly supported. 9 of 10 stations show statistically significant declines, trend is negative at all 10 |
| O4. Rapid fluctuations in temperature are becoming more common | “It went from like − 20 to + 20 °C in just a few hours, but then it went back down again. This kind of uneven temperatures is something that you thing has started to occur more recently ...” | Day-to day changes and temperature fluctuations. 5-day temperature range. Numbers of days with temperatures fluctuating around freezing | Claim not supported. No evidence of increasing variability in the case of day-to-day changes of 5-day temperature range. Slight decrease in variability observed at some locations |