Literature DB >> 30220308

No one to turn to: low social support and the incidence of undesired pregnancy in the United States.

Heidi Moseson1, Christine Dehlendorf2, Caitlin Gerdts3, Eric Vittinghoff4, Robert A Hiatt5, Jennifer Barber6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Young women may experience social barriers to achieving their reproductive goals. This analysis explored whether low social support may contribute to the high incidence of undesired pregnancy in young women in the United States. STUDY
DESIGN: Using 6 months of data from a prospective cohort of 970 women ages 18-22 years in the United States, we described contraceptive use and applied multivariable logistic regression and standardization to estimate adjusted odds and absolute risk of undesired pregnancy among women reporting low social support versus higher social support. We investigated several measures of contraceptive use as possible explanations for this pathway.
RESULTS: Sixty-five pregnancies were reported in the 6 months of the study, of which 30 (46%) were classified as undesired prior to conception. Among young women who reported low social support, 8% reported an undesired pregnancy during the study period as compared to 3% of the young women who reported higher levels of social support. Among non-black women, those who reported low social support had nearly seven times the odds of an undesired pregnancy as compared to women who reported higher social support (aOR: 6.8, 95%CI: 1.7, 27.1). We found no association between social support and undesired pregnancy among young black women. Contraceptive method use differed by social support at baseline, and throughout follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Low social support - defined as the feeling of not having anyone to turn to - may be a risk factor for persistently high levels of undesired pregnancy among young women in the U.S. This association may be driven by differences in contraceptive use by level of social support. IMPLICATIONS: Interventions to increase young women's perceptions of social support may reduce the risk of undesired pregnancy for some individuals.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contraception; Social support; Undesired pregnancy; Unintended pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30220308      PMCID: PMC6363106          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  29 in total

1.  Social networks, ideation, and contraceptive behavior in Bangladesh: a longitudinal analysis.

Authors:  D L Kincaid
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Racial segregation and longevity among African Americans: an individual-level analysis.

Authors:  Thomas A LaVeist
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.402

3.  Prepregnancy contraceptive use among teens with unintended pregnancies resulting in live births - Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2004-2008.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  Understanding pregnancy in a population of inner-city women in New Orleans--results of qualitative research.

Authors:  Carl Kendall; Aimee Afable-Munsuz; Ilene Speizer; Alexis Avery; Norine Schmidt; John Santelli
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004.

Authors:  Jennifer J Frost; Susheela Singh; Lawrence B Finer
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2007-06

6.  Family status and health behaviors: social control as a dimension of social integration.

Authors:  D Umberson
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1987-09

7.  The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence.

Authors:  D Russell; L A Peplau; C E Cutrona
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1980-09

8.  The effects of ambivalent fertility desires on pregnancy risk in young women in the USA.

Authors:  Warren B Miller; Jennifer S Barber; Heather H Gatny
Journal:  Popul Stud (Camb)       Date:  2012-12-13

9.  Pregnancy coercion, intimate partner violence and unintended pregnancy.

Authors:  Elizabeth Miller; Michele R Decker; Heather L McCauley; Daniel J Tancredi; Rebecca R Levenson; Jeffrey Waldman; Phyllis Schoenwald; Jay G Silverman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 3.375

10.  The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States.

Authors:  Sonya Borrero; Eleanor B Schwarz; Mitchell Creinin; Said Ibrahim
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.681

View more
  2 in total

1.  The contraceptive and reproductive history and planning goals of trans-masculine adults: a mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Brett Stark; Jaclyn M W Hughto; Brittany M Charlton; Madeline B Deutsch; Jennifer Potter; Sari L Reisner
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Social support reduces the risk of unintended pregnancy in a low-income population.

Authors:  Hartley Feld; Sheila Barnhart; Amanda T Wiggins; Kristin Ashford
Journal:  Public Health Nurs       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 1.770

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.