Carol Klingbeil1, Cori Gibson2. 1. Children's Hospital of WI, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: cklingbeil@chw.org. 2. Children's Hospital of WI, Milwaukee, WI, USA. Electronic address: CGibson@chw.org.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Teach-back is an evidence-based strategy identified as a cornerstone intervention for improving communication during healthcare encounters. Evidence supports the use of teach back with patients and families to improve understanding of discharge instructions and supporting self-management. There is significant evidence that staff do not routinely use teach-back while communicating with patients and families. DESIGN AND METHODS: This evidence-based practice project examined the impact of a brief educational intervention for a multidisciplinary staff on knowledge of health literacy and the use of teach-back during patient-education. Clinical staff working at a 290 bed Magnet® designated Midwest pediatric healthcare organization attended a 45-60 min, standardized, instructor led interactive teaching session about the impact of low health literacy, the use of open ended questions and how to use teach-back with patients and families. Pre and post education surveys, and a one-year sustainability survey were administered. RESULTS: Over 300 multidisciplinary team members (including acute care, emergency room, and surgical nurses, dieticians, respiratory care practitioners and occupational and physical therapists) participated in the education and surveys. Both nurses and non-nurses demonstrated increased knowledge of the teach-back process and reported high rates of clarifying information and correcting misunderstandings when using teach back with patients and families. Qualitative data revealed clarifications are often about medications and skill-based treatments. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Teach-back is a valuable strategy that can improve the safety and quality of health care and supports the National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy.
PURPOSE: Teach-back is an evidence-based strategy identified as a cornerstone intervention for improving communication during healthcare encounters. Evidence supports the use of teach back with patients and families to improve understanding of discharge instructions and supporting self-management. There is significant evidence that staff do not routinely use teach-back while communicating with patients and families. DESIGN AND METHODS: This evidence-based practice project examined the impact of a brief educational intervention for a multidisciplinary staff on knowledge of health literacy and the use of teach-back during patient-education. Clinical staff working at a 290 bed Magnet® designated Midwest pediatric healthcare organization attended a 45-60 min, standardized, instructor led interactive teaching session about the impact of low health literacy, the use of open ended questions and how to use teach-back with patients and families. Pre and post education surveys, and a one-year sustainability survey were administered. RESULTS: Over 300 multidisciplinary team members (including acute care, emergency room, and surgical nurses, dieticians, respiratory care practitioners and occupational and physical therapists) participated in the education and surveys. Both nurses and non-nurses demonstrated increased knowledge of the teach-back process and reported high rates of clarifying information and correcting misunderstandings when using teach back with patients and families. Qualitative data revealed clarifications are often about medications and skill-based treatments. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Teach-back is a valuable strategy that can improve the safety and quality of health care and supports the National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy.
Authors: Daniel José Correa; Lindsey Milano; Churl-Su Kwon; Nathalie Jetté; Dennis Dlugos; Lauren Harte-Hargrove; Mary Jo Pugh; Jessica K Smith; Solomon L Moshé Journal: Epilepsia Date: 2020-02-24 Impact factor: 5.864
Authors: Jeanine A M van der Giessen; Margreet G E M Ausems; Maria E T C van den Muijsenbergh; Sandra van Dulmen; Mirjam P Fransen Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Iris Feinberg; Michelle M Ogrodnick; Robert C Hendrick; Kimberly Bates; Kevin Johnson; Bingyan Wang Journal: Health Lit Res Pract Date: 2019-07-01
Authors: Jeanine van der Giessen; Mirjam P Fransen; Peter Spreeuwenberg; Mary Velthuizen; Sandra van Dulmen; Margreet G E M Ausems Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2020-12-15
Authors: Patrizio Zanobini; Chiara Lorini; Alberto Baldasseroni; Claudia Dellisanti; Guglielmo Bonaccorsi Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-02-06 Impact factor: 3.390