Literature DB >> 30219148

Preliminary results using patient-specific 3d printed models to improve preoperative planning for correction of post-traumatic tibial deformities with circular frames.

Pablo S Corona1, Matías Vicente2, Kevin Tetsworth3, Vaida Glatt4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preoperative planning for circular external fixators is considered vital towards achieving the best results for complex post-traumatic tibial deformities, and patient-specific 3D printed (3DP) models were used here as a planning aid. The main goal was to investigate the fidelity of the preoperative planning process, by assessing the potential to reduce operative time and determining the need to adjust pre-constructed frames intra-operatively. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine patients (10 limbs) underwent treatment for post-traumatic tibial complications using circular external fixation. These were compared to 10 similar cases where a 3DPM was not used as a pre-operative planning aide (Control group). Patient-specific models of affected bones were printed, and preoperative planning was performed using conventional techniques and Hexapod-assisted software. Detailed planning in a virtual procedure determined osteotomy levels and identified sites for wires and half-pins. The prototype of the external fixator was locked in this optimized configuration, removed from the model, and sterilized prior to the actual procedure.
RESULTS: Nine patients with 10 limbs were treated for complications following tibial fractures. Seven were infected non-unions, and three cases were malunions. For all cases a CT based 3DP model of the full tibia was used in the preoperative planning stage. Image analysis required a mean of 1.7 h, with an average of 14.9 h to 3D print each model. In the control group (without a 3D model), the mean surgical time was 329 min (180-680). The mean surgical time in the 3DPM group was only 172.4 min (72-240), (p = 0.024), reducing the surgery time by 48%. For the 3DPM group it was not necessary to modify the preassembled frame in any case, while in the Control group, the pre-constructed frame required intra-operative modifications in 8 of the 10 cases (p = 0.0007).
CONCLUSION: Using patient-specific 3D models has allowed us to carry out meticulous preoperative planning sessions, eliminating the need to modify or alter the frame assembly in the operating room, saving substantial surgical time and enabling a more precise design of the apparatus. This was especially useful in multiplanar deformities and for the spatial configuration of the foot support, talus ring, and ankle ring.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D modelling; 3D printing; Deformity correction; Hexapod; Malunion; Orthopaedic trauma; Tibia fractures; Virtual surgery planning

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30219148     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  6 in total

1.  3D-printed models improve surgical planning for correction of severe postburn ankle contracture with an external fixator.

Authors:  Youbai Chen; Zehao Niu; Weiqian Jiang; Ran Tao; Yonghong Lei; Lingli Guo; Kexue Zhang; Wensen Xia; Baoqiang Song; Luyu Huang; Qixu Zhang; Yan Han
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2021-10-15       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 2.  [3D printing in orthopedic and trauma surgery education and training : Possibilities and fields of application].

Authors:  Simon Weidert; Sebastian Andress; Eduardo Suero; Christopher Becker; Maximilian Hartel; Maren Behle; Christian Willy
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Overview of In-Hospital 3D Printing and Practical Applications in Hand Surgery.

Authors:  Marco Keller; Alissa Guebeli; Florian Thieringer; Philipp Honigmann
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Application of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: An Overview.

Authors:  Peng-Ran Liu; Lin Lu; Jia-Yao Zhang; Tong-Tong Huo; Song-Xiang Liu; Zhe-Wei Ye
Journal:  Curr Med Sci       Date:  2021-12-06

Review 5.  The Role of 3D Printing in Planning Complex Medical Procedures and Training of Medical Professionals-Cross-Sectional Multispecialty Review.

Authors:  Jarosław Meyer-Szary; Marlon Souza Luis; Szymon Mikulski; Agastya Patel; Finn Schulz; Dmitry Tretiakow; Justyna Fercho; Kinga Jaguszewska; Mikołaj Frankiewicz; Ewa Pawłowska; Radosław Targoński; Łukasz Szarpak; Katarzyna Dądela; Robert Sabiniewicz; Joanna Kwiatkowska
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-11       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 6.  A review and guide to creating patient specific 3D printed anatomical models from MRI for benign gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Teresa E Flaxman; Carly M Cooke; Olivier X Miguel; Adnan M Sheikh; Sukhbir S Singh
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-07-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.