Literature DB >> 30218789

CT analysis of anatomical distribution of melorheostosis challenges the sclerotome hypothesis.

Smita Jha1, Nicholas Laucis2, Lauren Kim3, Ashkan Malayeri3, Abhijit Dasgupta4, Georgios Z Papadakis5, Apostolos Karantanas6, Miguel Torres7, Timothy Bhattacharyya8.   

Abstract

Melorheostosis (MEL) is a rare disease of high bone mass with patchy skeletal distribution affecting the long bones. We recently reported somatic mosaic mutations in MAP2K1 in 8 of 15 patients with the disease. The unique anatomic distribution of melorheostosis is of great interest. The disease remains limited to medial or lateral side of the extremity with proximo-distal progression. This pattern of distribution has historically been attributed to sclerotomes (area of bone which is innervated by a single spinal nerve level). In a further analysis of our study on MEL, 30 recruited patients underwent whole body CT scans to characterize the anatomic distribution of the disease. Two radiologists independently reviewed these scans and compared it to the proposed map of sclerotomes. We found that the disease distribution conformed to the distribution of a single sclerotome in only 5 patients (17%). In another 12 patients, the lesions spanned parts of contiguous sclerotomes but did not involve the entire extent of the sclerotomes. Our findings raise concerns about the sclerotomal hypothesis being the definitive explanation for the pattern of anatomic distribution in MEL. We believe that the disease distribution can be explained by clonal proliferation of a mutated skeletal progenitor cell along the limb axis. Studies in mice models on clonal proliferation in limb buds mimic the patterns seen in melorheostosis. We also support this hypothesis by the dorso-ventral confinement of melorheostotic lesion in a patient with low allele frequency of MAP2K1-positive osteoblasts and low skeletal burden of the disease. This suggests that the mutation occurred after the formation of dorso-ventral plane. Further studies on limb development are needed to better understand the etiology, pathophysiology and pattern of disease distribution in all patients with MEL.
Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hyperostosis; Limb development; Sclerotomes; Somatic mutation

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30218789     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.09.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  5 in total

1.  Constitutive activation of MEK1 in osteoprogenitors increases strength of bone despite impairing mineralization.

Authors:  John L Fowlkes; R Clay Bunn; Philip D Ray; Evangelia Kalaitzoglou; Sasidhar Uppuganti; Mustafa Unal; Jeffry S Nyman; Kathryn M Thrailkill
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2019-11-02       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Fibroblasts from Patients with Melorheostosis Promote Angiogenesis in Healthy Endothelial Cells through Secreted Factors.

Authors:  Amelia C Hurley-Novatny; Jules D Allbritton-King; Smita Jha; Edward W Cowen; Robert A Colbert; Fatemeh Navid; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  J Invest Dermatol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 7.590

3.  Clinical Evaluation of Melorheostosis in the Context of a Natural History Clinical Study.

Authors:  Smita Jha; Edward W Cowen; Tanya J Lehky; Katharine Alter; Lauren Flynn; James C Reynolds; Eileen Lange; James D Katz; Joan C Marini; Richard M Siegel; Timothy Bhattacharyya
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-07-26

Review 4.  High Fidelity of Mouse Models Mimicking Human Genetic Skeletal Disorders.

Authors:  Robert Brommage; Claes Ohlsson
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2020-02-04       Impact factor: 5.555

5.  Dripping Wax Bone Disease - Melorheostosis - A Rare Case Scenario.

Authors:  M Lokesh; Sundar Suriya Kumar; Saikrishna Gadde
Journal:  J Orthop Case Rep       Date:  2020-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.