Tomoaki Sonobe1, Hitoshi Tabuchi2, Hideharu Ohsugi2, Hiroki Masumoto2, Naohumi Ishitobi2, Shoji Morita3, Hiroki Enno4, Daisuke Nagasato2. 1. Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan. t.sonobe@tsukazaki-eye.net. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Tsukazaki Hospital, 68-1 Waku, Aboshi-ku, Himeji, 671-1227, Japan. 3. Research Group of Intelligent Cybernetics and Computer Science Graduate School of Engineering, University of Hyogo, Himeji, Japan. 4. Rist Inc, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
PURPOSE: In this study, we compared deep learning (DL) with support vector machine (SVM), both of which use three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (3D-OCT) images for detecting epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: In total, 529 3D-OCT images from the Tsukazaki hospital ophthalmology database (184 non-ERM subjects and 205 ERM patients) were assessed; 80% of the images were divided for training, and 20% for test as follows: 423 training (non-ERM 245, ERM 178) and 106 test (non-ERM 59, ERM 47) images. Using the 423 training images, a model was created with deep convolutional neural network and SVM, and the test data were evaluated. RESULTS: The DL model's sensitivity was 97.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 87.7-99.9%] and specificity was 98.0% (95% CI, 89.7-99.9%), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.993 (95% CI, 0.993-0.994). In contrast, the SVM model's sensitivity was 97.6% (95% CI, 87.7-99.9%), specificity was 94.2% (95% CI, 84.0-98.7%), and AUC was 0.988 (95% CI, 0.987-0.988). CONCLUSION: DL model is better than SVM model in detecting ERM by using 3D-OCT images.
PURPOSE: In this study, we compared deep learning (DL) with support vector machine (SVM), both of which use three-dimensional optical coherence tomography (3D-OCT) images for detecting epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: In total, 529 3D-OCT images from the Tsukazaki hospital ophthalmology database (184 non-ERM subjects and 205 ERM patients) were assessed; 80% of the images were divided for training, and 20% for test as follows: 423 training (non-ERM 245, ERM 178) and 106 test (non-ERM 59, ERM 47) images. Using the 423 training images, a model was created with deep convolutional neural network and SVM, and the test data were evaluated. RESULTS: The DL model's sensitivity was 97.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 87.7-99.9%] and specificity was 98.0% (95% CI, 89.7-99.9%), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.993 (95% CI, 0.993-0.994). In contrast, the SVM model's sensitivity was 97.6% (95% CI, 87.7-99.9%), specificity was 94.2% (95% CI, 84.0-98.7%), and AUC was 0.988 (95% CI, 0.987-0.988). CONCLUSION: DL model is better than SVM model in detecting ERM by using 3D-OCT images.
Entities:
Keywords:
Deep learning; Epiretinal membrane; Optical coherence tomography; Support vector machine
Authors: Margarita Labkovich; Megan Paul; Eliott Kim; Randal A Serafini; Shreyas Lakhtakia; Aly A Valliani; Andrew J Warburton; Aashay Patel; Davis Zhou; Bonnie Sklar; James Chelnis; Ebrahim Elahi Journal: Digit Health Date: 2022-05-06