Literature DB >> 30217401

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young Patients in The Netherlands: Trend Analysis of >19,000 Primary Hip Replacements in the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.

Martijn F L Kuijpers1, Gerjon Hannink1, Liza N van Steenbergen2, Berend W Schreurs1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is one of the most successful interventions in medical care. Because of shifting trends in THA and failure rates being higher in younger patients, we aimed to assess trends in implant fixation, bearing type, head diameter, and surgical approach in patients younger than 55 years in the Netherlands using data from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register.
METHODS: Trends in the method of implant fixation, bearing type, head diameter, and surgical approach were analyzed over year of surgery (2007-2016) and over age groups (<25, 25-29, 30-34, 35-39, 40-44, 45-49, and 50-54 years).
RESULTS: Between 2007 and 2016, a total of 19,915 primary THAs were performed in patients <55 years. Osteoarthritis was the most prevalent diagnosis (66.1%). Uncemented fixation was used in 79.5% of all performed THAs. The use of 32-mm head diameters increased (from 32.6% in 2007 to 50.1% in 2016), where an increasing trend toward the use of ceramic-on-polyethylene as most frequently used bearing type was present (from 37.5% in 2007 to 53.8% in 2016). The posterolateral surgical approach was the most frequently used approach; however, the anterior approach is used increasingly (0.1% in 2007 to 21.1% in 2016). Ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces, 32-mm head diameters, and the anterior approach were most commonly used in patients between 50 and 54 years.
CONCLUSION: There was a clear preference for uncemented fixation in young patients. In head diameter, bearing type, and surgical approach, clear trends were visible. Characteristics of THA in young patients were subject to changing perspectives.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implant characteristics; outcomes; registry; total hip arthroplasty; trends; young patients

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30217401     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  8 in total

1.  [Mid- and long-term effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty with Ribbed femoral stem prosthesis in 354 cases].

Authors:  Tao Yang; Jie Xie; Yihe Hu; Senbo An; Long Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-09-15

2.  Greater increase in femoral offset with use of collum femoris-preserving stem than Tri-Lock stem in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mengxuan Yao; Yuchuan Wang; Congcong Wei; Yongtai Han; Huijie Li
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 1.671

3.  Clinical and radiological results of high offset tri-lock bone preservation stem in unilateral primary total hip arthroplasty at a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

Authors:  Linbo Peng; Jun Ma; Yi Zeng; Yuangang Wu; Haibo Si; Bin Shen
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-24       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Hip Resurfacing vs Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Younger than 35 Years: A Comparison of Revision Rates and Patient-Reported Outcomes.

Authors:  Drake G LeBrun; Tony S Shen; Patawut Bovonratwet; Rachelle Morgenstern; Edwin P Su
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-10-08

5.  A Scoping Review of Total Hip Arthroplasty Survival and Reoperation Rates in Patients of 55 Years or Younger: Health Services Implications for Revision Surgeries.

Authors:  Ahmed M Negm; Lauren A Beaupre; C Michael Goplen; Colleen Weeks; C Allyson Jones
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2022-07-19

6.  Augmented Rehabilitation Program for Patients 60 Years and Younger Following Total Hip Arthroplasty-Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Ahmed M Negm; Milad Yavarai; Gian S Jhangri; Robert Haennel; C Allyson Jones
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-09

7.  Comparison of collum femoris-preserving stems and ribbed stems in primary total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Mingqing Li; Can Xu; Jie Xie; Yihe Hu; Hua Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 2.359

8.  Comparison of Supine and Lateral Decubitus Positions for Total Hip Arthroplasty with the Direct Lateral Approach in Overweight and Obese Patients.

Authors:  Olcay Güler; Sidar Öztürk; Ferit Tufan Özgezmez; Mehmet Halis Çerçi
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.