Literature DB >> 30217046

Enhanced Photodynamic Anticancer Activities of Multifunctional Magnetic Nanoparticles (Fe₃O₄) Conjugated with Chlorin e6 and Folic Acid in Prostate and Breast Cancer Cells.

Kyong-Hoon Choi1, Ki Chang Nam2, Guangsup Cho3, Jin-Seung Jung4, Bong Joo Park5,6.   

Abstract

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a promising alternative to conventional cancer treatment methods. Nonetheless, improvement of in vivo light penetration and cancer cell-targeting efficiency remain major challenges in clinical photodynamic therapy. This study aimed to develop multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles conjugated with a photosensitizer (PS) and cancer-targeting molecules via a simple surface modification process for PDT. To selectively target cancer cells and PDT functionality, core magnetic (Fe₃O₄) nanoparticles were covalently bound with chlorin e6 (Ce6) as a PS and folic acid (FA). When irradiated with a 660-nm long-wavelength light source, the Fe₃O₄-Ce6-FA nanoparticles with good biocompatibility exerted marked anticancer effects via apoptosis, as confirmed by analyzing the translocation of the plasma membrane, nuclear fragmentation, activities of caspase-3/7 in prostate (PC-3) and breast (MCF-7) cancer cells. Ce6, used herein as a PS, is thus more useful for PDT because of its ability to produce a high singlet oxygen quantum yield, which is owed to deep penetration by virtue of its long-wavelength absorption band; however, further in vivo studies are required to verify its biological effects for clinical applications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer cell targeting; chlorin e6; folic acid; in vivo penetration depth; multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles

Year:  2018        PMID: 30217046      PMCID: PMC6163241          DOI: 10.3390/nano8090722

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)        ISSN: 2079-4991            Impact factor:   5.076


1. Introduction

Cancer is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Every year, an estimated 11 million individuals are diagnosed with cancer, and approximately 7 million individuals die of cancer according to the World Health Organization (WHO) [1]. Therefore, cancer currently ranks among the deadliest diseases, and advancements in medical technology have yielded various methods for cancer treatment over the last few decades [2]. Among them, traditional chemotherapy is limited by its severe toxicity, poor tumor-specific delivery, and the possibility of inducing multi-drug resistance [3,4,5]. However, in comparison with chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT) offers certain unique advantages including minimal invasiveness, fewer side effects, negligible chemotherapeutic resistance, and low systematic toxicity [6,7,8]. In PDT, photosensitizers (PS) are the key components that transfer photo-energy to the surrounding O2 molecules, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS), primarily singlet oxygen (1O2), to eliminate proximal cancer cells [9,10,11,12]. According to a recent study, various PSs have developed, which absorb light over a broad range from ultraviolet (UV) to the near-infrared (NIR) range [13,14]. However, the absorption bands of many PSs are primarily in the UV-Vis region [15,16]. Furthermore, the PSs with the absorption band in the NIR range have low 1O2 quantum yield owing to a low population of PSs in the triplet state [17,18]. Therefore, these PSs are often limited by their low 1O2 quantum yields, and low depth of penetration resulting from a short excitation wavelength [15,16]. In addition, currently available PSs are mostly nonspecifically activated and have poor water solubility and stability and low accumulation at the target site, resulting in treatment-related toxicity, light-induced degradation of drug molecules, and other side effects on adjacent normal tissue and blood cells [6,19,20,21]. To overcome these limitations, various inorganic and organic nanocarriers, including Fe3O4 nanoclusters, Au nanoparticles, graphene oxide, mesoporous silica nanoparticles, and polymer micelles, have been used to improve the stability and therapeutic outcomes of these PSs [22,23,24,25,26]. Nonetheless, the development of multifunctional nanoparticles with enhanced anticancer efficiency remains a major challenge in PDT. Herein, to achieve enhanced photodynamic anticancer activity, we designed and fabricated a novel Fe3O4 nanoparticle conjugated with chlorin e6 (Ce6) and folic acid (FA) (Fe3O4-Ce6-FA) via simple surface modification. To enhance the PDT efficiency, magnetic core particles were conjugated with Ce6 and FA as PDT agents to increase the in vivo penetration depth of the light source and selectively eliminate cancer cells. In addition, we evaluated the efficiency of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles for specific targeting and photodynamic anticancer activity in vitro. The Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles developed herein could be a promising multifunctional nanoreagent for photodynamic tumor therapy and multifunctional drug delivery in the future.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Multifunctional Fe3O4-Ce6-FA

Multifunctional 20-nm Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles were fabricated via a simple surface modification via a wet chemical process as shown in Scheme 1. Ce6, having a long-wavelength absorption band and high singlet oxygen quantum yield, was conjugated with Fe ions on the surface of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles via esterification. Additionally, the multifunctional nanoparticles were functionalized with FA used as a targeting molecule to deliver these particles to the cancer cell membrane.
Scheme 1

Fabrication procedure for the multifunctional magnetic nanoparticles.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis were performed to confirm the appearance, size distribution, and crystallinity of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles. As shown in Figure 1a,b, Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles had a uniform spherical structure and a rough surface, measuring approximately 20 nm in diameter (Figure 1a inset). High-resolution TEM (HRTEM) images revealed regular parallel lattice fringes, indicating the high crystallinity of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles (inset of Figure 1b). The lattice spacing of 0.26 nm was consistent with the in-plane lattice spacing of the (311) planes in the typical spinel structure of magnetite nanoparticles. The size histogram indicates that the average size of the particles was 19.8 nm with a distribution of 1.16 nm (Figure 1c). The wide-angle XRD pattern of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles can be indexed to the typical cubic structure of spinel Fe3O4 (JCPDS No. 19-629). The six strong Bragg reflection peaks (2θ = 30.2°, 35.7°, 43.4°, 53.6°, 57.4°, 63.0°), marked by their Miller indices ((220), (311), (400), (422), (511), and (440)) were obtained from standard Fe3O4 powder diffraction data (Figure 1d).
Figure 1

Structural analysis of the cholrin6- and folic acid-conjugated magnetite (Fe3O4-Ce6-FA) nanoparticles. (a) Field emission scanning electron and (b) transmission electron micrographs of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles; (c) histogram of particle size distribution; (d) X-ray diffraction pattern of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles.

Figure 2a shows the magnetic hysteresis loops of pure Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles at room temperature. As shown, both samples exhibited superparamagnetic behavior without obvious remnant magnetization and coercivity owing to their small magnetite nanocrystal composition. The saturation magnetization (Ms) of pure Fe3O4 was 80.5 emu/g. After coating with PS and FA, the Ms of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles decreased to 58.5 emu/g. The minor reduction in magnetization primarily resulted from the reduction in the density of Fe3O4 due to the presence of non-magnetic coating layers. However, the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles (20 nm) still showed strong magnetization, thereby suggesting their suitability for magnetic separation and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging.
Figure 2

Magnetic and optical properties of the cholrin6- and folic acid-conjugated magnetite (Fe3O4-Ce6-FA) nanoparticles. (a) Room temperature magnetic hysteresis loops of pure Fe3O4 and Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles; (b) Photoluminescence and photoluminescence excitation spectra of free Ce6 and the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA in THF.

Figure 2b shows the photoluminescence (PL) and photoluminescence excitation (PLE) spectra of the pure Ce6 and the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles in THF. Ce6 displayed three main UV-Vis absorption peaks with an intense Soret band at 400 nm and two relatively weak Q-bands at 500 and 662 nm, respectively. After encapsulation of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles, a remarkable red shift and peak broadening in the UV-Vis spectrum of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles were observed, indicating the strong bonding between Ce6 and the magnetite nanoparticle [27]. Upon excitation at 660 nm, free Ce6 exhibited two strong emission peaks at 672 and 707 nm. The Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles also exhibited a red shift and broadening compared with free Ce6, concurrent with the phenomenon observed during absorption. We used 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF), a specific 1O2 probe, to quantify the 1O2 generated from the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles by monitoring the absorbance of DPBF at 424 nm. Figure 3a exhibits the time-dependent UV-Vis absorption spectra of complexes of DPBF and Fe3O4-Ce6-FA in ethanol, which were irradiated with a red light-emitting diode (LED) light source. Upon excitation at 660 nm, the intensity of the absorbance peak of DPBF at 424 nm decreased gradually with the increase in irradiation time in the presence of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles (Figure 3b). In the blank condition, no appreciable degradation of DPBF was observed after irradiation for 35 min. Near-complete photodegradation of DPBF in the presence of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles was observed within 35 min. This clearly indicates that the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles can effectively generate the 1O2 ROS. Based on the reaction kinetics, which was well fitted into the equation In(C/C0) = −k × time (min), the apparent first-order rate constant, k, of DPBF photo-oxidation was 0.05094 min−1 for the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles (Figure 3c).
Figure 3

(a) UV-Vis spectra of 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran (DPBF) in ethanol with the chlorin e6- and folic acid-conjugated magnetite (Fe3O4-Ce6-FA) nanoparticles in accordance with the irradiation time with a red LED lamp (λmax = 660 nm); (b) The kinetic curve of the photodegradation efficiency of DPBF as a function of irradiation time; (c) Comparison of first-order degradation rates of DPBF.

2.2. In Vitro Cytotoxicity of Multifunctional Fe3O4-Ce6-FA Nanoparticles

For biomaterials to be used for biomedical applications, a basic biocompatibility assay is necessary to evaluate their cytotoxicity. Therefore, the in vitro cytotoxicity of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA was evaluated in normal fibroblast (L-929), breast cancer (MCF-7), and prostate cancer (PC-3) cell lines, as described previously [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Twofold-diluted concentrations of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA from 100 to 6.25 μg/mL were tested, and non-treated cells constituted the control. As shown in Figure 4a, the cell viabilities of all cells exceeded 95%, indicating that Fe3O4-Ce6-FA displayed no cytotoxicity in all cells, suggesting that Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles may have biomedical applications with excellent biocompatibility.
Figure 4

Biocompatibility and photodynamic anticancer activities of chlorin e6 and folic acid-conjugated magnetite (Fe3O4-Ce6-FA) nanoparticles. (a) Cytotoxicity and (b) phototoxicity of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles in MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma) and PC-3 (prostate adenocarcinoma) cell lines. Quantitative data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (n = 4), and the statistical comparisons were evaluated using Student’s t-test. Significant differences were indicated by p < 0.05 (*** p < 0.0005 vs. control). (c) Images of MCF-7 and PC-3 cells after staining with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated Annexin V (Annexin V-FITC) thus demonstrating the membrane translocation of the cells. The green fluorescence signal was produced by Annexin V-FITC. “FCF” represents Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles. Scale bar = 50 μm. (d) Nuclear fragmentation and caspase-3/7 activity in MCF-7 and PC-3 cells. The cells were stained with Hoechst 33342 to detect nuclear fragmentation and CellEvent Caspase-3/7 Green Detection reagent to detect caspase-3/7 activity after 6 h post photodynamic therapy at 20 mW for 30 min. Arrows represent apoptotic bodies of cells. Scale bar= 30 μm.

2.3. In Vitro Photodynamic Anticancer Activity of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA Nanoparticles

To confirm the photo-killing ability of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles, PC-3 and MCF-7 cell lines were exposed to LED irradiation for 10 min after incubation with various concentrations of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles for 2 h. As shown in Figure 4b, cell viabilities of the two cell lines were significantly decreased with an increase in nanoparticle concentration, and the cell viability of PC-3 cells was even more drastically decreased compared to that of MCF-7 cells, even at the lowest concentration of 6.25 μg/mL. This indicated that the photo-killing efficacy of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles was concentration-dependent. Moreover, Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles are more effective than Fe3O4 conjugated with hematoporphyrins (HPs) and FA, as reported previously [30,31]. The PS (Ce6) used herein is more applicable for PDT owing to its attributes, which include a high singlet oxygen quantum yield and long-wavelength absorption band, resulting in deeper light penetration in vivo compared with HP-conjugated nanoparticles. In other words, the photodynamic anticancer efficacy of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles was closely associated with singlet oxygen quantum yield and the concentration of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles. Considering the photodynamic anticancer activity of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles, the mechanisms underlying cancer cell death were evaluated via analysis of the translocation of the plasma membrane, using an Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) apoptosis detection kit, nuclear fragmentation using a fluorescent dye (Hoechst 33342), and enzyme activities of caspase-3/7 using a CellEvent Caspase-3/7 Green Detection reagent. First, PC-3 and MCF-7 cells were stained with Annexin V-FITC reagent post-irradiation after incubation with Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles for 2 h to confirm phosphatidylserine translocation from the intracellular to the extracellular leaflet of the plasma membrane, which is a hallmark of the early stage of apoptotic cell death. Figure 4c shows the images of live and apoptotic cells stained with Annexin V-FITC, post-irradiation. Both cell types (MCF-7 and PC-3) in the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticle-treated groups showed green fluorescence, whereas control cells did not. These results indicate that PDT following treatment with Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles induced cancer cell death via apoptosis. Additionally, nuclear fragmentation of cancer cells, which is also a hallmark of apoptotic cell death, was confirmed via staining with Hoechst 33342 dye. As shown in Figure 4d, the nuclei of both cell types treated with Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles were more condensed than those of control cells, and most nuclei of PC-3 cells rapidly changed to granular apoptotic nuclear bodies. However, no changes were detected in the control cells of both cell lines. These results also indicated that irradiation after treatment with Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles enhanced apoptotic cell death. Finally, caspase-3/7 activity, which essentially contributes to apoptotic cell death, were also evaluated using a fluorogenic substrate highly specific for activated caspase-3 and -7. As shown in Figure 4d, both cell types (MCF-7 and PC-3) treated with Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles showed strong green fluorescence. Moreover, the PC-3 cells treated with Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles showed morphological changes following irradiation, as indicated by the presence of apoptotic cellular bodies. These results indicate that cells treated with Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles expressed high amounts of activated caspase-3 and -7 upon irradiation, and that the cells underwent apoptotic cell death. Overall, the results indicate that Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles induced apoptotic cell death.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Preparation of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA Nanoparticles

Multifunctional Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanocomposites were synthesized in accordance with a previously reported procedure with minor modifications [28]. In brief, FeCl3·6H2O (0.54 g) and NaAc·3H2O (1.5 g) in 20 mL ethylene glycol (EG) and diethylene glycol (DEG) (1:19) were added in a 200 mL round-bottom flask, and the mixture was vigorously stirred for 30 min. Thereafter, the yellowish homogeneous solution formed was sealed in a teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave. The autoclave was heated to and maintained at 200 °C for 10 h and cooled to ambient temperature. The black precipitate was harvested via magnetic decantation, washed with deionized water and absolute alcohol several times, and then dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 12 h. The photoactive and targeting functionalities of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles were achieved using a wet chemical process similar to our previous method [29]. Briefly, 20 mg of precipitated Fe3O4 nanoparticles with 20 nm size were mixed with a solution of Ce6/EtOH (final concentration, 10−4 M). The Ce6 molecules are easily conjugated to the surface of magnetite nanoparticles owing to the three terminal carboxyl groups, which initiate covalent bonding. Furthermore, the Ce6 molecules have a high singlet oxygen quantum yield of 0.77 in solution [34]. This value of singlet oxygen quantum yield is higher than that of the other photosensitizers such as hematoporphyrin (0.51) [35] and protoporphyrin (0.63) [36]. The solution was vigorously agitated for 24 h at room temperature. After the reaction was completed, the product was washed several times with EtOH. To facilitate targeting functionality, the FA molecules were conjugated to Ce6-bonded Fe3O4 nanoparticles (Fe3O4-Ce6). Similarly, the washed Fe3O4-Ce6 nanoparticles were fully dispersed in 20 mL of FA/dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) solution (3.7 × 10−4 M). The mixture solution was stirred for another 5 h at 25 °C. The Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanocomposites were separated via magnetic decantation and washed with DMSO and phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; pH = 7.2) several times. Thereafter, the resulting nanoparticles were finally dried in vacuum at room temperature for 24 h. The concentration of HP and FA bonded to the surfaces of the Fe3O4 nanoparticles was estimated using UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy.

3.2. Physical Characterization of Multifunctional Fe3O4-Ce6-FA Particles

TEM (JEM-2100F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and FE-SEM (SU-70, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) were performed to study the morphology of the multifunctional nanoparticles. The crystallographic structure of the composite particles was investigated via XRD (X’Pert Pro MPD, PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands), using Cu Kα radiation. A vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM; Lakeshore 7300, Lake Shore Cryotronics, Westerville, OH, USA) was used to obtain magnetization versus magnetic field loop up to H = 10 kOe at room temperature. Steady-state absorption and PL and PLE spectra were measured using a UV–Vis spectrophotometer (U-2800, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and spectrofluorometer (F-4500, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), respectively.

3.3. Biocompatibility of Fe3O4-Ce6-FA Nanoparticles

Cytotoxicity of the Fe3O4-Ce6-FA (FCF) nanoparticles was evaluated in L-929 (mouse fibroblasts), MCF-7 (breast adenocarcinoma), and PC-3 (prostate adenocarcinoma) cell lines, as described previously [28,29,30,31,32,33]. Briefly, all cells were seeded in a 24-well plate at 1.5 × 105 cells/mL and incubated at 37 °C in 5% CO2 for 24 h, followed by further incubation with various concentrations (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) of FCF nanoparticles after exchanging the media with fresh media, in the dark. After another 24 h incubation, the viable cells were quantified using Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan) assay reagent in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions after washing three times with Dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS). The optical density for each well was measured using a multimode microplate reader (Cytation 3, BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA) with an optical filter at 450 nm, and cell viability was determined in comparison with the untreated control.

3.4. Photodynamic Anticancer Activity of Multifunctional FCF Nanoparticles

Anticancer activity of the FCF nanoparticles was also assessed in MCF-7 and PC-3 cells on the basis of cell viability determined using CCK-8 after irradiation, as described previously [33,34,35,36]. Each cell type was plated in a 24-well plate at the same concentration and incubated as described in 3.3. Thereafter, the cells were further incubated with various concentrations (0, 6.25, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) of FCF nanoparticles for 2 h in the dark, followed by three washes with DPBS, replenishment of the media, and irradiation with a red light-emitting diode (LED; FD-332R-N1, Fedy Technology Co., Shenzhen, China). The LEDs were driven using a constant current buck driver (LED-2800, TMC Co., Gunpo, Korea) and light intensity was regulated via pulse width modulation (CB210, Comfile Technology, Seoul, Korea). LED irradiation was applied at a maximum wavelength of 660 nm at 20 mW/cm2. After irradiation for 30 min, cancer cells were further incubated for 24 h, and cell viability was determined via a CCK-8 assay, as described in Section 3.3. To evaluate the mechanisms underlying cancer cell death by Fe3O4-Ce6-FA after irradiation, both cancer cell types pre-cultured for 24 h were further incubated with 12.5 μg/mL of FCF after replenishing media in the dark. After 2 h of incubation, each cell type was irradiated with LED light at the same power for 10 min, as described previously in this section, and further incubated for 6 h to induce cell death. Thereafter, the plasma membranes and nuclei of both cell types were stained with an Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection reagent (Komabiotech Inc., Seoul, Korea), Hoechst 33342 dye (Invitrogen, Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR, USA), and a CellEvent Caspase-3/7 Green Detection reagent (Invitrogen) in accordance with the manufacturers’ instructions. After staining each sample, fluorescence microscopic images were acquired using an automated live cell imager (Lionheart FX; BioTek Instruments, Inc., VT, USA).

4. Conclusions

In summary, we synthesized Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanoparticles for FA receptor-targeted PDT. PS and FA were covalently bound to the surface of the magnetite nanoparticles. The prepared multifunctional Fe3O4-Ce6-FA nanocomposites had high water solubility and good biocompatibility without any cytotoxicity. Moreover, Fe3O4-Ce6-FA exhibited more effective anticancer activity via apoptosis in prostate (PC-3) and breast cancer (MCF-7) cell lines in comparison with Fe3O4 conjugated with HPs. Thus, the PS (Ce6) used in this study is more useful for PDT applications owing to its ability to produce a high singlet oxygen quantum yield and deep penetration owing to its long-wavelength absorption band. However, further in vivo studies are required to verify its biological effects for clinical applications, although we believe that our study makes a significant contribution to PDT because it supports the use of chlorin e6 as a PS in multifunctional nanomaterials for effective PTD.
  29 in total

1.  Designing excited states: theory-guided access to efficient photosensitizers for photodynamic action.

Authors:  Yusuf Cakmak; Safacan Kolemen; Selin Duman; Yavuz Dede; Yusuf Dolen; Bilal Kilic; Ziya Kostereli; Leyla Tatar Yildirim; A Lale Dogan; Dicle Guc; Engin U Akkaya
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 15.336

2.  Marriage of scintillator and semiconductor for synchronous radiotherapy and deep photodynamic therapy with diminished oxygen dependence.

Authors:  Chen Zhang; Kuaile Zhao; Wenbo Bu; Dalong Ni; Yanyan Liu; Jingwei Feng; Jianlin Shi
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 3.  Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update.

Authors:  Patrizia Agostinis; Kristian Berg; Keith A Cengel; Thomas H Foster; Albert W Girotti; Sandra O Gollnick; Stephen M Hahn; Michael R Hamblin; Asta Juzeniene; David Kessel; Mladen Korbelik; Johan Moan; Pawel Mroz; Dominika Nowis; Jacques Piette; Brian C Wilson; Jakub Golab
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 508.702

4.  Iron oxide @ polypyrrole nanoparticles as a multifunctional drug carrier for remotely controlled cancer therapy with synergistic antitumor effect.

Authors:  Chao Wang; Huan Xu; Chao Liang; Yumeng Liu; Zhiwei Li; Guangbao Yang; Liang Cheng; Yonggang Li; Zhuang Liu
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 15.881

5.  Optimization in solvent selection for chlorin e6 in photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Shubhajit Paul; Paul Wan Sia Heng; Lai Wah Chan
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 6.  Photodynamic therapy for cancer.

Authors:  Dennis E J G J Dolmans; Dai Fukumura; Rakesh K Jain
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  A multi-stimuli responsive gold nanocage-hyaluronic platform for targeted photothermal and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhenzhen Wang; Zhaowei Chen; Zhen Liu; Peng Shi; Kai Dong; Enguo Ju; Jinsong Ren; Xiaogang Qu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Singlet oxygen quantum yields of potential porphyrin-based photosensitisers for photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  Sean Mathai; Trevor A Smith; Kenneth P Ghiggino
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.982

9.  Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012.

Authors:  Jacques Ferlay; Isabelle Soerjomataram; Rajesh Dikshit; Sultan Eser; Colin Mathers; Marise Rebelo; Donald Maxwell Parkin; David Forman; Freddie Bray
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 7.396

10.  Combination of Near Infrared Light-Activated Photodynamic Therapy Mediated by Indocyanine Green with Etoposide to Treat Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Ting Luo; Qinrong Zhang; Qing-Bin Lu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-06-05       Impact factor: 6.639

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Aspects of high-performance and bio-acceptable magnetic nanoparticles for biomedical application.

Authors:  Preeti Kush; Parveen Kumar; Ranjit Singh; Ajeet Kaushik
Journal:  Asian J Pharm Sci       Date:  2021-07-04       Impact factor: 6.598

Review 2.  Heptamethine Cyanine-Loaded Nanomaterials for Cancer Immuno-Photothermal/Photodynamic Therapy: A Review.

Authors:  Cátia G Alves; Rita Lima-Sousa; Bruna L Melo; André F Moreira; Ilídio J Correia; Duarte de Melo-Diogo
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-08       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 3.  Light-Induced Therapies for Prostate Cancer Treatment.

Authors:  Claudia Ferroni; Alberto Del Rio; Cecilia Martini; Elisabetta Manoni; Greta Varchi
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 5.221

4.  Synthesis, Characterization, Biomedical Application, Molecular Dynamic Simulation and Molecular Docking of Schiff Base Complex of Cu(II) Supported on Fe3O4/SiO2/APTS.

Authors:  Rahime Eshaghi Malekshah; Bahareh Fahimirad; Ali Khaleghian
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2020-04-20

5.  Combined Photothermal and Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer Treatment Using a Multifunctional Graphene Oxide.

Authors:  Shi Guo; Zhengmei Song; Ding-Kun Ji; Giacomo Reina; Jean-Daniel Fauny; Yuta Nishina; Cécilia Ménard-Moyon; Alberto Bianco
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 6.525

Review 6.  Photodynamic therapy for prostate cancer: Recent advances, challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Qin Xue; Jingliang Zhang; Jianhua Jiao; Weijun Qin; Xiaojian Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-23       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Human natural killer cells for targeting delivery of gold nanostars and bimodal imaging directed photothermal/photodynamic therapy and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Bin Liu; Wen Cao; Jin Cheng; Sisi Fan; Shaojun Pan; Lirui Wang; Jiaqi Niu; Yunxiang Pan; Yanlei Liu; Xiyang Sun; Lijun Ma; Jie Song; Jian Ni; Daxiang Cui
Journal:  Cancer Biol Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.248

Review 8.  Recent Advances in Magnetite Nanoparticle Functionalization for Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Roxana Cristina Popescu; Ecaterina Andronescu; Bogdan Stefan Vasile
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 5.076

9.  Synthesis and toxicity assessment of Fe3O4 NPs grafted by ∼ NH2-Schiff base as anticancer drug: modeling and proposed molecular mechanism through docking and molecular dynamic simulation.

Authors:  Rahime Eshaghi Malekshah; Bahareh Fahimirad; Mohammadreza Aallaei; Ali Khaleghian
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 6.419

Review 10.  Functionalized Fe3O4 Nanoparticles as Glassy Carbon Electrode Modifiers for Heavy Metal Ions Detection-A Mini Review.

Authors:  Amanda Kulpa-Koterwa; Tadeusz Ossowski; Paweł Niedziałkowski
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.