Literature DB >> 30216600

Second rate or a second chance? Assessing biomass and biodiversity recovery in regenerating Amazonian forests.

Gareth D Lennox1, Toby A Gardner2,3, James R Thomson4,5, Joice Ferreira6, Erika Berenguer1,7, Alexander C Lees8,9, Ralph Mac Nally4,10, Luiz E O C Aragão11,12, Silvio F B Ferraz13, Julio Louzada14, Nárgila G Moura15, Victor H F Oliveira14, Renata Pardini16, Ricardo R C Solar17, Fernando Z Vaz-de Mello18, Ima C G Vieira15, Jos Barlow1,14,15.   

Abstract

Secondary forests (SFs) regenerating on previously deforested land account for large, expanding areas of tropical forest cover. Given that tropical forests rank among Earth's most important reservoirs of carbon and biodiversity, SFs play an increasingly pivotal role in the carbon cycle and as potential habitat for forest biota. Nevertheless, their capacity to regain the biotic attributes of undisturbed primary forests (UPFs) remains poorly understood. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of SF recovery, using extensive tropical biodiversity, biomass, and environmental datasets. These data, collected in 59 naturally regenerating SFs and 30 co-located UPFs in the eastern Amazon, cover >1,600 large- and small-stemmed plant, bird, and dung beetles species and a suite of forest structure, landscape context, and topoedaphic predictors. After up to 40 years of regeneration, the SFs we surveyed showed a high degree of biodiversity resilience, recovering, on average among taxa, 88% and 85% mean UPF species richness and composition, respectively. Across the first 20 years of succession, the period for which we have accurate SF age data, biomass recovered at 1.2% per year, equivalent to a carbon uptake rate of 2.25 Mg/ha per year, while, on average, species richness and composition recovered at 2.6% and 2.3% per year, respectively. For all taxonomic groups, biomass was strongly associated with SF species distributions. However, other variables describing habitat complexity-canopy cover and understory stem density-were equally important occurrence predictors for most taxa. Species responses to biomass revealed a successional transition at approximately 75 Mg/ha, marking the influx of high-conservation-value forest species. Overall, our results show that naturally regenerating SFs can accumulate substantial amounts of carbon and support many forest species. However, given that the surveyed SFs failed to return to a typical UPF state, SFs are not substitutes for UPFs.
© 2018 The Authors. Global Change Biology Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amazon; biodiversity; biomass; carbon; forest succession; secondary forests; species composition; species richness

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30216600     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.14443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  8 in total

1.  Long-term changes in avian biomass and functional diversity within disturbed and undisturbed Amazonian rainforest.

Authors:  David A Luther; W Justin Cooper; Vitek Jirinec; Jared D Wolfe; Cameron L Rutt; Richard O Bierregaard; Thomas E Lovejoy; Philip C Stouffer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 5.530

2.  Large carbon sink potential of secondary forests in the Brazilian Amazon to mitigate climate change.

Authors:  Viola H A Heinrich; Ricardo Dalagnol; Henrique L G Cassol; Thais M Rosan; Catherine Torres de Almeida; Celso H L Silva Junior; Wesley A Campanharo; Joanna I House; Stephen Sitch; Tristram C Hales; Marcos Adami; Liana O Anderson; Luiz E O C Aragão
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Assessing invertebrate herbivory in human-modified tropical forest canopies.

Authors:  Julia Rodrigues Barreto; Erika Berenguer; Joice Ferreira; Carlos A Joly; Yadvinder Malhi; Marina Maria Moraes de Seixas; Jos Barlow
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.912

4.  Natural disturbance impacts on trade-offs and co-benefits of forest biodiversity and carbon.

Authors:  Martin Mikoláš; Marek Svitok; Radek Bače; Garrett W Meigs; William S Keeton; Heather Keith; Arne Buechling; Volodymyr Trotsiuk; Daniel Kozák; Kurt Bollmann; Krešimir Begovič; Vojtěch Čada; Oleh Chaskovskyy; Dheeraj Ralhan; Martin Dušátko; Matej Ferenčík; Michal Frankovič; Rhiannon Gloor; Jeňýk Hofmeister; Pavel Janda; Ondrej Kameniar; Jana Lábusová; Linda Majdanová; Thomas A Nagel; Jakob Pavlin; Joseph L Pettit; Ruffy Rodrigo; Catalin-Constantin Roibu; Miloš Rydval; Francesco M Sabatini; Jonathan Schurman; Michal Synek; Ondřej Vostarek; Veronika Zemlerová; Miroslav Svoboda
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-10-20       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Linking land-use and land-cover transitions to their ecological impact in the Amazon.

Authors:  Cássio Alencar Nunes; Erika Berenguer; Filipe França; Joice Ferreira; Alexander C Lees; Julio Louzada; Emma J Sayer; Ricardo Solar; Charlotte C Smith; Luiz E O C Aragão; Danielle de Lima Braga; Plinio Barbosa de Camargo; Carlos Eduardo Pellegrino Cerri; Raimundo Cosme de Oliveira; Mariana Durigan; Nárgila Moura; Victor Hugo Fonseca Oliveira; Carla Ribas; Fernando Vaz-de-Mello; Ima Vieira; Ronald Zanetti; Jos Barlow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 12.779

6.  Evaluating remote sensing datasets and machine learning algorithms for mapping plantations and successional forests in Phnom Kulen National Park of Cambodia.

Authors:  Minerva Singh; Damian Evans; Jean-Baptiste Chevance; Boun Suy Tan; Nicholas Wiggins; Leaksmy Kong; Sakada Sakhoeun
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Haiti has more forest than previously reported: land change 2000-2015.

Authors:  Ose Pauleus; T Mitchell Aide
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  Tracking the impacts of El Niño drought and fire in human-modified Amazonian forests.

Authors:  Erika Berenguer; Gareth D Lennox; Joice Ferreira; Yadvinder Malhi; Luiz E O C Aragão; Julia Rodrigues Barreto; Fernando Del Bon Espírito-Santo; Axa Emanuelle S Figueiredo; Filipe França; Toby Alan Gardner; Carlos A Joly; Alessandro F Palmeira; Carlos Alberto Quesada; Liana Chesini Rossi; Marina Maria Moraes de Seixas; Charlotte C Smith; Kieran Withey; Jos Barlow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.