Literature DB >> 30216478

The role of maintenance therapy in patients with diffuse large B cell lymphoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Alon Rozental1,2, Anat Gafter-Gvili3,2, Liat Vidal1,2, Pia Raanani1,2, Ronit Gurion1,2.   

Abstract

Randomized trials of maintenance therapy (MT) in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are inconclusive regarding its effect on overall survival (OS) and disease control. We aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of MT in this meta-analysis. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing MT with observation or placebo, in patients with DLBCL, who achieved complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after first-line chemotherapy with or without rituximab. Primary outcome was OS. Secondary outcomes included relapse rate, disease control (defined as progression-free survival, event-free survival, or disease-free survival, as reported in the original trials), and safety. Our search yielded 14 trials including 5122 patients. Median age of patients was 49 to 70 years. Six trials included rituximab as the MT; three included Interferon alfa; other trials include thalidomide, lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and prednisone, serine threonine kinase inhibitor enzastaurin, and mTOR inhibitor everolimus. MT did not improve OS compared to observation, OR 0.91, (95% CI 0.78-1.07). Results were the same in a subgroup analysis by the type of maintenance (rituximab vs other). MT did decreased relapse rate, RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.89) and improved disease control, OR 0.74 (95% CI 0.65-0.84). Disease control was significantly improved in the subgroup of studies evaluating rituximab as maintenance OR 0.61 (95% CI 0.47-0.79) and in the subgroup of R-CHOP induction studies OR 0.77 (95% CI 0.67-0.88). Serious or grade III/IV adverse events including neutropenia and infections were significantly more common in the maintenance arm, RR = 1.69 (95% CI 1.29-2.22). MT in patients with DLBCL achieving CR or PR after induction therapy did not affect OS, yet it decreased relapse rate and improved disease control at the cost of higher infection rate. Our data do not support routine administration of MT in patients with DLBCL.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aggressive lymphoma; diffuse large cell lymphoma; maintenance; rituximab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30216478     DOI: 10.1002/hon.2561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 0278-0232            Impact factor:   5.271


  5 in total

1.  Maintenance therapy for untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ting Yuan; Feng Zhang; Qingmin Yao; Yanxia Liu; Xiaojuan Zhu; Peng Chen
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2021-05-29

2.  Autologous Cytokine-Induced Killer Cell Immunotherapy for Patients with High-Risk Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma After the First Complete Remission.

Authors:  Min Zhou; Jing Wang; Cui-Ping Li; Jing-Yan Xu; Bing Chen
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Rituximab in combination with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Myrna Candelaria; Alfonso Dueñas-Gonzalez
Journal:  Ther Adv Hematol       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 4.  Evolution of therapy for limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Alexandra E Rojek; Sonali M Smith
Journal:  Blood Cancer J       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 11.037

Review 5.  Stem Cell as Vehicles of Antibody in Treatment of Lymphoma: a Novel and Potential Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Jiayi Zhang; Zhaohu Yuan; Weijie Zhong; Yaming Wei
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev Rep       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 5.739

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.