Literature DB >> 30216436

Oncologist volume and outcomes in older adults diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma.

Scott F Huntington1,2, Jessica R Hoag2, Weiwei Zhu2, Rong Wang2,3, Amer M Zeidan1,2, Smith Giri1,2, Nikolai A Podoltsev1, Steven D Gore1, Xiaomei Ma2,3, Cary P Gross2, Amy J Davidoff2,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although provider-level volume is frequently associated with outcomes in cancers requiring complex surgeries, whether similar relations exist for cancers treated primarily with systemic therapy is unknown.
METHODS: Using a population-based cohort analysis of older adults diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) during the years 2004-2011, we evaluated the association between oncologist volume and 4 clinical outcomes (receipt of any chemotherapy, receipt of an anthracycline-containing or equivalent regimen, early hospitalization, and overall survival). Our primary explanatory variable was lymphoma treatment volume, defined as the number of patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma for which an oncologist initiated therapy during a 12-month look-back period from each incident DLBCL case.
RESULTS: We identified 8247 Medicare beneficiaries who were newly diagnosed with DLBCL. Chemotherapy was administered to 6202 (75.2%) beneficiaries, and 71.4% of cytotoxic regimens contained an anthracycline. Beneficiaries who were treated by higher-volume oncologists had increased odds of receiving chemotherapy (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.45; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.24-1.70; P <.001) and of receiving an anthracycline-containing regimen (aOR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.06-1.50; P = .009). Receiving care from a higher-volume provider was also associated with decreased hospitalization (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.69-0.95; P = .007) and improved survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.79-0.92; P < .001).
CONCLUSION: In older adults diagnosed with DLBCL, receiving care from a provider with more experience treating lymphoma patients was associated with receipt of guideline-adherent therapy, reduced hospitalizations, and improved survival. Clinical volume may be an important factor in providing high-quality cancer care in the modern era.
© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer outcomes; diffuse large B cell lymphoma; non-Hodgkin lymphoma; quality of care; volume-outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30216436      PMCID: PMC6263848          DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

1.  Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  H Tilly; M Gomes da Silva; U Vitolo; A Jack; M Meignan; A Lopez-Guillermo; J Walewski; M André; P W Johnson; M Pfreundschuh; M Ladetto
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 2.  A systematic review of the volume-outcome relationship for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Quoc-Dien Trinh; Anders Bjartell; Stephen J Freedland; Brent K Hollenbeck; Jim C Hu; Shahrokh F Shariat; Maxine Sun; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 20.096

3.  Treatment patterns and comparative effectiveness in elderly diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients: a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results-medicare analysis.

Authors:  Paul A Hamlin; Sacha Satram-Hoang; Carolina Reyes; Khang Q Hoang; Sridhar R Guduru; Sandra Skettino
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-10-23

4.  Long-term results of the R-CHOP study in the treatment of elderly patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a study by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte.

Authors:  P Feugier; A Van Hoof; C Sebban; P Solal-Celigny; R Bouabdallah; C Fermé; B Christian; E Lepage; H Tilly; F Morschhauser; P Gaulard; G Salles; A Bosly; C Gisselbrecht; F Reyes; B Coiffier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-05-02       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Relation between operator and hospital volume and outcomes following percutaneous coronary interventions in the era of the coronary stent.

Authors:  P D McGrath; D E Wennberg; J D Dickens; A E Siewers; F L Lucas; D J Malenka; M A Kellett; T J Ryan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2000-12-27       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  A novel approach to improve health status measurement in observational claims-based studies of cancer treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Amy J Davidoff; Ilene H Zuckerman; Naimish Pandya; Franklin Hendrick; Xuehua Ke; Arti Hurria; Stuart M Lichtman; Arif Hussain; Jonathan P Weiner; Martin J Edelman
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.599

7.  Incidence and predictors of low chemotherapy dose-intensity in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a nationwide study.

Authors:  Gary H Lyman; David C Dale; Jonathan Friedberg; Jeffrey Crawford; Richard I Fisher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 8.  Lymphoma in older patients.

Authors:  Catherine Thieblemont; Bertrand Coiffier
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Influence of the treatment facility volume on the survival of patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma.

Authors:  Ronald S Go; Mohammed Al-Hamadani; Nilay D Shah; Cynthia S Crowson; Sara J Holton; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Impact of primary prophylaxis with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on febrile neutropenia and mortality in adult cancer patients receiving chemotherapy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicole M Kuderer; David C Dale; Jeffrey Crawford; Gary H Lyman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  5 in total

1.  Rural and urban patients with diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma experience reduced overall survival: a National Cancer DataBase study.

Authors:  Andrew J Ritter; Jordan S Goldstein; Amy A Ayers; Christopher R Flowers
Journal:  Leuk Lymphoma       Date:  2019-01-11

2.  Economic impacts of care by high-volume providers for non-curative esophagogastric cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Nicole J Look Hong; Victoria Zuk; Laura E Davis; Vaibhav Gupta; Craig C Earle; Nicole Mittmann; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Variation in receipt of therapy and survival with provider volume for medical oncology in non-curative esophago-gastric cancer: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Julie Hallet; Laura E Davis; Alyson L Mahar; Ying Liu; Victoria Zuk; Vaibhav Gupta; Craig C Earle; Natalie G Coburn
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  Association Between Ownership of Imaging Equipment and Appropriateness of Staging Positron-Emission Tomography in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma.

Authors:  Scott F Huntington; Weiwei Zhu; Jessica R Hoag; Rong Wang; Amer M Zeidan; Smith Giri; Nikolai A Podoltsev; Steven D Gore; Xiaomei Ma; Cary P Gross; Amy J Davidoff
Journal:  JNCI Cancer Spectr       Date:  2019-05-11

5.  The centralization of bladder cancer care and its implications for patient travel distance.

Authors:  Kelly R Pekala; Jonathan G Yabes; Jathin Bandari; Michelle Yu; Benjamin J Davies; Lindsay M Sabik; Jeremy M Kahn; Bruce L Jacobs
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2021-06-20       Impact factor: 3.498

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.