Literature DB >> 30215955

Evaluating Medical Decision-Making Capacity in Practice.

Craig Barstow1, Brian Shahan1, Melissa Roberts1.   

Abstract

Medical decision-making capacity is the ability of a patient to understand the benefits and risks of, and the alternatives to, a proposed treatment or intervention (including no treatment). Capacity is the basis of informed consent. Patients have medical decision-making capacity if they can demonstrate understanding of the situation, appreciation of the consequences of their decision, and reasoning in their thought process, and if they can communicate their wishes. Capacity is assessed intuitively at every medical encounter and is usually readily apparent. However, a more formal capacity evaluation should be considered if there is reason to question a patient's decision-making abilities. Such reasons include an acute change in mental status, refusal of a clearly beneficial recommended treatment, risk factors for impaired decision making, or readily agreeing to an invasive or risky procedure without adequately considering the risks and benefits. Any physician can evaluate capacity, and a structured approach is best. Several formal assessment tools are available to help with the capacity evaluation. Consultation with a psychiatrist may be helpful in some cases, but the final determination on capacity is made by the treating physician. If a patient is found not to have capacity, a surrogate decision maker should be identified and consulted. If the patient is unable to give consent and identifying a surrogate decision maker will result in a delay that might increase the risk of death or serious harm, physicians can provide emergency care without formal consent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30215955

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Fam Physician        ISSN: 0002-838X            Impact factor:   3.292


  6 in total

1.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation-induced consciousness.

Authors:  Raman P Singh; Soumya Adhikari; David Landsberg; Viren Kaul
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2020-10-06

2.  Nursing Home and Vaccination Consent: The Italian Perspective.

Authors:  Nunzia Cannovo; Roberto Scendoni; Marzia Maria Fede; Federico Siotto; Piergiorgio Fedeli; Mariano Cingolani
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-24

3.  Outcomes of a Decision-Making Capacity Assessment Model at the Grey Nuns Community Hospital.

Authors:  Lesley Charles; Utkarsha Kothavade; Suzette Brémault-Phillips; Karenn Chan; Bonnie Dobbs; Peter George Jaminal Tian; Sharna Polard; Jasneet Parmar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Navigating the Minefield: Managing Refusal of Medical Care in Older Adults with Chronic Symptoms of Mental Illness.

Authors:  Cathal O'Cionnaith; Anne P F Wand; Carmelle Peisah
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2021-07-12       Impact factor: 4.458

5.  Perceived barriers to assessing understanding and appreciation of informed consent in clinical trials: A mixed-method study.

Authors:  Erin D Solomon; Jessica Mozersky; Kari Baldwin; Matthew P Wroblewski; Meredith V Parsons; Melody Goodman; James M DuBois
Journal:  J Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2021-06-26

6.  It's not 'just a tube of blood': principles of protocol development, sample collection, staffing and budget considerations for blood-based biomarkers in immunotherapy studies.

Authors:  Cindy Y Jiang; Zeqi Niu; Michael D Green; Lili Zhao; Shelby Raupp; Brittany Pannecouk; Dean E Brenner; Sunitha Nagrath; Nithya Ramnath
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2021-07       Impact factor: 13.751

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.