| Literature DB >> 30215576 |
Yoke Bee Chang1, Fook Yuan Lee2, Meh Meh Goh3, David Keung-Hung Lam1, Agnes Beng-Hoi Tan4.
Abstract
Routine flexible nasoendoscopy in otolaryngology clinics is well established, the rate-limiting step of which being the speed of the nasoendoscopes reprocessing method used. Non-lumened flexible nasoendoscopes are expensive, heat-sensitive, delicate instruments that cannot be sterilized in an autoclave but must be disinfected by means of high level disinfection (HLD). In one of the public hospitals in Singapore, the method of disinfection was recently changed to the use of commercial impregnated wipes which generates less than 1% chlorine dioxide upon activation. An exposure assessment was performed to assess the potential exposure of healthcare workers (HCWs) to airborne chlorine dioxide during nasoendoscope disinfection. A total of 14 long-term personal samples, four short-term personal samples and 16 long-term area samples were collected over 8 days in midget impingers containing 0.02% potassium iodide in sodium carbonate/sodium bicarbonate buffer during the nasoendoscope disinfection. The samples were then analyzed by ion-chromatograph. The chlorine dioxide concentrations and upper confidence limit at 95% confidence level (UCL95%) for personal and area samples collected were all below the occupational exposure limits (OEL) for chlorine dioxide (Singapore Workplace Safety and Health PELs, ACGIH TLVs, U.S. OSHA PELs). The study presented evidence that the exposure of HCWs to chlorine dioxide during high-level disinfection of flexible nasoendoscopes were deemed insignificant.Entities:
Keywords: Chlorine dioxide; exposure assessment; healthcare; high-level disinfection; impregnated wipes; non-lumened flexible nasoendoscopes
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 30215576 DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2018.1523617
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Occup Environ Hyg ISSN: 1545-9624 Impact factor: 2.155