Literature DB >> 30215307

Debridement, Curettage, and Bone Marrow Stimulation: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.

Charles P Hannon1, Steve Bayer2, Christopher D Murawski2, Gian Luigi Canata3, Thomas O Clanton4, Daniel Haverkamp5, Jin Woo Lee6, Martin J O'Malley7, Hua Yinghui8, James W Stone9.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evidence supporting best practice guidelines in the field of cartilage repair of the ankle are based on both low quality and low levels of evidence. Therefore, an international consensus group of experts was convened to collaboratively advance toward consensus opinions based on the best available evidence on key topics within cartilage repair of the ankle. The purpose of this article is to report the consensus statements on "Debridement, Curettage and Bone Marrow Stimulation" developed at the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle.
METHODS: Seventy-five international experts in cartilage repair of the ankle representing 25 countries and 1 territory were convened and participated in a process based on the Delphi method of achieving consensus. Questions and statements were drafted within 11 working groups focusing on specific topics within cartilage repair of the ankle, after which a comprehensive literature review was performed and the available evidence for each statement was graded. Discussion and debate occurred in cases where statements were not agreed upon in unanimous fashion within the working groups. A final vote was then held, and the strength of consensus was characterized as follows: consensus, 51% to 74%; strong consensus, 75% to 99%; unanimous, 100%.
RESULTS: A total of 14 statements on debridement, curettage, and bone marrow stimulation reached consensus during the 2017 International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle. One achieved unanimous support, 12 reached strong consensus (greater than 75% agreement), and 1 achieved consensus. All statements reached at least 72% agreement.
CONCLUSIONS: This international consensus derived from leaders in the field will assist clinicians with debridement, curettage and bone marrow stimulation as a treatment strategy for osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle; bone marrow stimulation; debridement; microfracture; osteochondral lesion; talus

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30215307     DOI: 10.1177/1071100718779392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  13 in total

1.  Large variation in management of talar osteochondral lesions among foot and ankle surgeons: results from an international survey.

Authors:  Matteo Guelfi; Christopher W DiGiovanni; James Calder; Francesc Malagelada; Guillaume Cordier; Masato Takao; Jorge Batista; Caio Nery; Marino Delmi; Miki Dalmau-Pastor; Giovanni Carcuro; Gabriel Khazen; Jordi Vega
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-11-22       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Fixation of the osteochondral talar fragment yields good results regardless of lesion size or chronicity.

Authors:  Naoki Haraguchi; Takaki Shiratsuchi; Koki Ota; Takuma Ozeki; Masaki Gibu; Hisateru Niki
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-21       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Review on Talus Osteochondral Injuries, Including Osteochondritis Dissecans.

Authors:  Juergen Bruns; Christian Habermann; Mathias Werner
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Re-operation rate after surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus in paediatric and adolescent patients.

Authors:  Daniel Körner; Christoph E Gonser; Stefan Döbele; Christian Konrads; Fabian Springer; Gabriel Keller
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Comparison of autologous osteoperiosteal cylinder and osteochondral graft transplantation in the treatment of large cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs): a protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  En Deng; Weili Shi; Yanfang Jiang; Qinwei Guo
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  A comparison between arthroscopic and open surgery for treatment outcomes of chronic lateral ankle instability accompanied by osteochondral lesions of the talus.

Authors:  Can Xu; Mingqing Li; Chenggong Wang; Hua Liu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Arthroscopic lift, drill, fill and fix (LDFF) is an effective treatment option for primary talar osteochondral defects.

Authors:  Kaj T A Lambers; Jari Dahmen; Mikel L Reilingh; Christiaan J A van Bergen; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 8.  Return to Sports After Surgical Treatment of Osteochondral Defects of the Talus: A Systematic Review of 2347 Cases.

Authors:  Jason A H Steman; Jari Dahmen; Kaj T A Lambers; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-10-22

9.  Outcomes of Bone Marrow Stimulation for Secondary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus Equal Outcomes for Primary Lesions.

Authors:  Quinten G H Rikken; Jari Dahmen; Mikel L Reilingh; Christiaan J A van Bergen; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-06-24       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Evidence-based Treatment of Failed Primary Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review on Clinical Outcomes of Bone Marrow Stimulation.

Authors:  Jari Dahmen; Eoghan T Hurley; Yoshiharu Shimozono; Christopher D Murawski; Sjoerd A S Stufkens; Gino M M J Kerkhoffs; John G Kennedy
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 4.634

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.