Literature DB >> 30214294

Distinct prognostic values of mRNA expression of glutathione peroxidases in non-small cell lung cancer.

Kui Liu1, Meng Jin1, Li Xiao1, Huiguo Liu1, Shuang Wei1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Glutathione peroxidases (GPxs) constitutes an enzyme family which has the ability to reduce free hydrogen peroxide to water and lipid hydroperoxides to their corresponding alcohols, and its main biological roles are to protect organisms from oxidative stress-induced damage. GPxs include eight members in different tissues of the body, and they play essential roles in carcinogenesis. However, the prognostic value of individual GPx in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains elusive.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In the current study, we investigated the prognostic value of GPxs in NSCLC patients through the "Kaplan-Meier plotter" database, wherein updated gene expression data and survival information from a total of 1,926 NSCLC patients are included.
RESULTS: High expression of GPx1 mRNA was correlated with worse overall survival (OS) in adenocarcinoma patients. High expression of GPx2 mRNA was correlated with worse OS for all NSCLC patients. In contrast, high expression of GPx3 mRNA was associated with better OS for all NSCLC patients. High expression of GPx4 mRNA was significantly correlated with worsening adenocarcinoma in these patients. GPx5 mRNA high expression correlated with worsening OS for all NSCLC patients. DISCUSSION: The current findings of prognostic values of individual mRNA expression of GPxs in NSCLC patients indicate some GPxs may have prognostic value in NSCLC patients, and this needs further study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  KM plotter; NSCLC; cancer stem cell; glutathione peroxidases (GPxs); hazard ratio; prognosis

Year:  2018        PMID: 30214294      PMCID: PMC6118261          DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S163432

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Manag Res        ISSN: 1179-1322            Impact factor:   3.989


Introduction

Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide in both men and women.1,2 Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) includes adenocarcinoma (ADE) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and accounts for 75–80% of cases of lung cancer. A multidisciplinary approach combining the application of chemotherapy with alternative treatment modalities as well as targeted therapy have aided improvement in survival outcomes. However, success with the above treatment modalities has continually been constrained by various limitations.3,4 Therefore, further investigation on the mechanism of progression, as well as identification of prognostic markers, will help select patients with a higher chance of lung cancer recurrence and provide better prognosis and individualized treatment. Glutathione peroxidases (GPxs) belong to an enzyme family which has the ability to reduce free hydrogen peroxide to water and lipid hydroperoxides to their corresponding alcohols; their main biological roles are to protect organisms from oxidative stress-induced damage.5–8 GPxs include eight members in different tissues of the body with different substrate specificity, and they play essential roles in the protection of the organism from oxidative damage and carcinogenesis.8–10 Reactive oxygen species (ROS)-induced oxidative stress from mitochondrial dysfunction or NADPH oxidase (NOX) overactivation and ectopic expression of antioxidative enzymes were involved in EGFR-mediated tumor progression and drug resistance in malignancies including NSCLC.11,12 However, the prognostic values of individual GPxs in NSCLC remain elusive. The “Kaplan–Meier plotter” (KM plotter) generated data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/)13 database. The KM plotter database was initially established using data on expression manifested by 22,277 genes in a group of 1,809 patients with breast cancer.14,15 Later, this database also included gene expression data and survival information from a total of 1,715 NSCLC patients.16 Recently, this database has included gene expression data and survival information from patients with ovarian cancer,17 gastric cancer, as well as liver cancer.18 Thus, KM plotter can be utilized for the analysis of individual genes with clinical results to relapse-free survival and total survival of the patients. So far, a number of genes have been identified and/or validated by KM plotter in breast cancer19–27 as well as in NSCLC.28 In this study, we determined the prognostic value of individual GPx in human NSCLC patients using the KM plotter database.

Materials and methods

We used an online database14 to determine the relevance of mRNA expression of individual GPx members to relapse-free survival. The database was established using gene expression data and survival information of 1,926 NSCLC patients downloaded from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Briefly, eight GPx sub-members (GPx1, GPx2, GPx3, GPx4, GPx5, GPx6, GPx7, and GPx8) were entered into the database (http://kmplot.com/analysis/index.php?p=service&cancer=lung) to obtain Kaplan–Meier survival plots in which the number-at-risk is indicated below the main plot. The certain gene mRNA expression above or below the median separates the cases into high and low expression, respectively. HR (95% CIs) and log rank p were calculated and displayed on the webpage.

Results

The GPxs family comprises a total of eight sub-members. Among all the eight GPxs isoenzymes, only GPx8 is not included in the database; GPx6 and GPx7 share the same mRNA in www.kmplot.com. We first examined the prognostic value of GPx1 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 200736_s_at (GPx1). Survival curves were plotted for all patients (n=1,926; Figure 1A), for ADE (n=720; Figure 1B), and for SCC (n=524; Figure 1C). High expression of GPx1 mRNA was not found to be correlated with overall survival (OS) for all NSCLC patients followed for 20 years (HR 1.03 [95% CI 0.9–1.16]; p=0.7). However, high expression of GPx1 mRNA was found to be correlated to worsen OS in ADE patients (HR 1.49 [95% CI 1.18–1.89]; p=0.00083), but not in SCC patients (HR 0.81 [95% CI 0.64–1.03]; p=0.082).
Figure 1

The prognostic value of GPx1 expression according to the database of Kaplan–Meier plotter.

Notes: The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 200736_s_at (GPx1). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all patients (n=1,926). (B) Survival curves are plotted for adenocarcinoma (n=720). (C) Survival curves are plotted for squamous cell carcinoma (n=524). Probability: overall survival.

We then examined the prognostic value of GPx2 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 239595_at (GPx2). High expression of GPx2 mRNA correlated with worse OS for all NSCLC patients (HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.38–1.93]; p=5.1e-09; Figure 2A). However, high expression of GPx2 mRNA was not significantly correlated with worse OS in ADE patients (HR 1.21 [95% CI 0.95–1.54]; p=0.12; Figure 2B) and SCC patients (HR 1.37 [95% CI 1–1.87]; p=0.051; Figure 2C).
Figure 2

The prognostic value of GPx2 expression according to the database of Kaplan–Meier plotter.

Notes: The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 239595_at (GPx2). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all patients (n=1,145). (B) Survival curves are plotted for adenocarcinoma (n=673). (C) Survival curves are plotted for squamous cell carcinoma (n=271). Probability: overall survival.

Figure 3 shows the prognostic value of GPx3 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 201348_at (GPx3). High expression of GPx3 mRNA correlated with better OS for all NSCLC patients (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.67–0.86]; p=2e-05; Figure 3A). However, high expression of GPx3 mRNA was not significantly correlated with better OS in ADE patients (HR 0.85 [95% CI 0.67–1.07]; p=0.16; Figure 3B) and SCC patients (HR 0.87 [95% CI 0.69–1.11]; p=0.27; Figure 3C).
Figure 3

The prognostic value of GPx3 expression according to the database of Kaplan–Meier plotter.

Notes: The desired Affymetrix IDs is valid: 201348_at (GPx3). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all patients (n=1,926). (B) Survival curves are plotted for adenocarcinoma (n=720). (C) Survival curves are plotted for squamous cell carcinoma (n=524). Probability: overall survival.

Figure 4 shows the prognostic value of GPx4 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 201106_at (GPx4). The curves show that high expression of GPx4 mRNA above or below the median do not separate the cases into significantly different prognostic groups among all NSCLC patients (HR 0.97 [95% CI 0.85–1.1]; p=0.63; Figure 4A). However, high expression of GPx4 mRNA was significantly correlated with worse OS in ADE patients (HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.03–1.65]; p=0.029; Figure 2B), but not in SCC patients (HR 0.98 [95% CI 0.78–1.25]; p=0.9; Figure 4C).
Figure 4

The prognostic value of GPx4 expression according to the database from Kaplan Meier plotter.

Notes: The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 201106_at (GPx4). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all patients (n=1,926). (B) Survival curves are plotted for adenocarcinoma (n=720). (C) Survival curves are plotted for squamous cell carcinoma (n=524). Probability: overall survival.

Figure 5 shows the prognostic value of GPx5 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 214648_at (GPx5). GPx5 mRNA high expression was found to be correlated with worse OS for all NSCLC patients (HR 1.19 [95% CI 1.05–1.35]; p=0.0064; Figure 5A). In addition, high expression of GPx5 mRNA was found to be correlated with worse OS in ADE patients (HR 1.57 [95% CI 1.24–1.99]; p=0.00013; Figure 5B), but not in SCC patients (HR 1.08 [95% CI 0.85–1.37]; p=0.52; Figure 5C).
Figure 5

The prognostic value of GPx5 expression according to the database of Kaplan–Meier plotter.

Notes: The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 214648_at (GPx5). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all patients (n=1,926). (B) Survival curves are plotted for adenocarcinoma (n=720). (C) Survival curves are plotted for squamous cell carcinoma (n=524). Probability: overall survival.

Figure 6 shows the prognostic value of GPx6 or GPx7 mRNA expression in www.kmplot.com. The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 213170_at (GPx6 or7). The curves show that high expression of GPx6/7 mRNA above or below the median do not separate the cases into significantly different prognostic groups in all NSCLC patients (HR 1.13 [95% CI 1–1.28]; p=0.056; Figure 6A), in ADE patients (HR 1.19 [95% CI 0.94–1.5]; p=0.15; Figure 6B), as well as in SCC patients (HR 0.95 [95% CI 0.75–1.2]; p=0.67; Figure 6C).
Figure 6

The prognostic value of GPx6/7 expression according to the database of Kaplan–Meier plotter.

Notes: The desired Affymetrix ID is valid: 213170_at (GPx6/7). (A) Survival curves are plotted for all patients (n=1,926). (B) Survival curves are plotted for adenocarcinoma (n=720). (C) Survival curves are plotted for squamous cell carcinoma (n=524). Probability: overall survival.

To further determine the correlation of individual GPx with other clinicopathological features, we determined their correlation with the smoking status (Table 1), clinical stages (Table 2), and chemotherapy (Table 3) of NSCLC patients. As shown in Table 1, high expression of GPx5, GPx6, or GPx7 mRNA was correlated with worse OS in never-smoked NSCLC patients. From Table 2, it is apparent that GPx2, GPx3, GPx6, or GPx7 are significantly associated with clinical stages of NSCLC patients. From the data in Table 3, it is evident that none of the GPxs are significantly associated with NSCLC patients, with or without chemotherapy, probably due to the relatively limited number of patients.
Table 1

Correlation of GPx mRNA expression with smoking status of NSCLC patients

GPxsSmoking statusCasesHR (95% CI)p-value
GPx1Never smoked2051.45 (0.83–2.54)0.19
Smoked8201.01 (0.82–1.24)0.92
GPx2Never smoked1410.74 (0.33–1.67)0.47
Smoked3001.18 (0.78–1.76)0.43
GPx3Never smoked2051.05 (0.6–1.82)0.87
Smoked8200.86 (0.7–1.06)0.16
GPx4Never smoked2051.55 (0.88–2.73)0.13
Smoked8200.93 (0.76–1.15)0.51
GPx5Never smoked2052.39 (1.33–4.29)0.0027
Smoked8201.15 (0.94–1.42)0.17
GPx6/7Never smoked2052.35 (1.31–4.22)0.0032
Smoked8201.11 (0.91–1.37)0.3

Abbreviations: GPxs, glutathione peroxidases; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

Table 2

Correlation of GPx mRNA expression with clinical stages of NSCLC patients

GPxsClinical stagesCasesHR (95% CI)p-value
GPx1I5771.29 (0.98–1.29)0.066
II2441.17 (0.81–1.69)0.4
III701.09 (0.63–1.88)0.77
GPx2I4491.52 (1.11–2.08)0.0086
II1611.08 (0.69–1.7)0.74
III441.29 (0.64–2.59)0.47
GPx3I5770.63 (0.48–0.83)0.00083
II2441.28 (0.89–1.85)0.19
III701.08 (0.62–1.87)0.78
GPx4I5771.25 (0.95–1.64)0.11
II2441.26 (0.87–1.82)0.22
III701.36 (0.79–2.36)0.27
GPx5I5771.28 (0.98–1.68)0.072
II2441.57 (1.09–2.27)0.015
III700.7 (0.4–1.21)0.19
GPx6/7I5771.81 (1.37–2.38)1.9e-05
II2441.28 (0.89–1.85)0.18
III700.81 (0.47–1.4)0.45

Abbreviations: GPxs, glutathione peroxidases; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

Table 3

Correlation of GPx mRNA expression with chemotherapy of NSCLC patients

GPxsChemotherapyCasesHR (95% CI)p-value
GPx1No3101.12 (0.8–1.57)0.51
Yes1761.11 (0.73–1.67)0.63
GPx2No210.35 (0.06–1.93)0.21
Yes341.89 (0.56–6.35)0.3
GPx3No3100.79 (0.56–1.1)0.16
Yes1761.31 (0.87–1.98)0.2
GPx4No3100.76 (0.54–1.06)0.11
Yes1760.96 (0.64–1.45)0.85
GPx5No3100.85 (0.61–1.19)0.33
Yes1760.79 (0.53–1.19)0.26
GPx6/7No3101.01 (0.73–1.42)0.93
Yes1761.19 (0.79–1.79)0.4

Abbreviations: GPxs, glutathione peroxidases; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer.

Discussion

Changes in GPx levels in several types of tumor have been reported. GPx1 was reported to prevent oxidative DNA mutations and, thus, GPx1 may prevent tumorigenesis.29 Overexpressed GPx1 reduced tumor growth, which indicates that it has a role in protecting against tumorigenesis.30 The dual role of GPx2 in tumorigenesis has been reviewed recently.9,31 Overexpression of GPx2 was observed in several tumors,32,33 including lung cancer,34 indicating that GPx2 may be an oncogene. GPx3 is considered to be a novel tumor suppressor, as hypermethylation of GPx3 was detected in tumor samples from patients with Barrett’s esophagus35–37 as well as in endometrial38 and prostate cancers,39 and downregulation of GPx3 was generally correlated with worse prognosis. Moreover, GPx4 is considered to be a tumor suppressor, because it is downregulated in pancreatic30 and breast cancers.40 In addition, GPx4 overexpression reduced fibrosarcoma cell growth.41 So far, there are no reports on the role of GPx5, -6, -7, and -8 in tumorigenesis. With the exception of GPx3, all GPx members were reported to be associated with the prognosis of tumor patients. For example, increased GPx1 expression was significantly associated with poor prognosis in oral SCC42 and laryngeal SCC.43 In contrast, loss of GPx1 expression was associated with aggressiveness and poor survival in patients with gastric cancer.43 Furthermore, GPx2 overexpression was correlated with poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma45 and gastric cancer.46 In contrast, loss of GPx2 expression was associated with patients who had esophageal SCC.47 The distinct different prognostic values of GPx1 and GPx2 in different types of cancer patients have not been well explained so far.48 Several reports exist about the liver changes associated with mRNA expression of GPxs in NSCLC cell lines and/or tumor tissues;49–51 however, the prognostic value of mRNA expression of GPxs in NSCLC patients has not been reported. KM plotter is a widely used database containing gene expression data and survival information.17 Until now, a number of genes, such as ALDH1, GLI1, ITIH5, CK2, RAI14, and GREB1, have been identified and validated by KM plotter in lung,16,28,52,53 breast,19–28,54 gastric,55,56 and ovarian cancers.28,57,58 Using KM plotter, we determined the prognostic value of individual GPx mRNA in NSCLC patients. High expression of GPx1 mRNA was not correlated with OS for all NSCLC patients followed for 20 years. However, high expression of GPx1 mRNA was correlated with worse OS in ADE patients (HR 1.49 [95% CI 1.18–1.89]; p=0.00083). High expression of GPx2 mRNA correlated with worse OS for all NSCLC patients (HR 1.63 [95% CI 1.38–1.93]; p=5.1e-09). In contrast, high expression of GPx3 mRNA correlated with better OS for all NSCLC patients (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.67–0.86]; p=2e-05). High expression of GPx4 mRNA was significantly correlated with worse OS in ADE patients (HR 1.3 [95% CI 1.03–1.65]; p=0.029). High expression of GPx5 mRNA correlated with worse OS for all NSCLC patients (HR 1.19 [95% CI 1.05–1.35]; p=0.0064). High expression of GPx6/7mRNA was not correlated with OS for all NSCLC patients. GPx8, as a novel member belonging to the GPx family, has been identified in a phylogenetic analysis in amphibia and mammalia.59 GPx8 is a membrane protein, lung-abundant enzyme, and is detected in the endoplasmic reticulum.60,61 However, little is known about its role. In addition, individual GPx may interact among themselves and finally affect the prognosis of NSCLC patients. However, the KM plotter cannot be used to analysis the impact between the various isoforms of GPx. Moreover, the KM plotter cannot be used to analyze the correlation between isoenzyme expression. Nicotine can regulate a number of biological functions such as cell proliferation, invasion, inflammation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis.62 Through inducing the secretion of stem cell factors, nicotine is able to regulate the growth and metastasis of NSCLC.63 There is no evidence about the direct correlation between nicotine and GPx expression in NSCLC. However, nicotine treatment may significantly impact the expression of GPx1 in peripheral blood lymphocytes,64 rat kidneys,65 as well as in a novel cell line – Danio rerio gill (DrG) – derived from the gill tissue of zebrafish.66 Furthermore, nicotine treatment was reported to significantly impact the expression of GPx4, GPx6, and GPx7 in rat brain.67 In this report, we observed that high expression of GPx5, GPx6, or GPx7 mRNA correlated with worse OS in never-smoked NSCLC patients. There are a number of reports about the prognostic values of GPxs in tumor patients. For example, loss of GPx1 expression was associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor survival in patients with gastric cancer.43 GPx2 overexpression indicates poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma,45 gastric cancer,46 and urothelial carcinomas of the upper urinary tract and urinary bladder.68 However, patients with prostate cancer with high GPx2 expression on the biopsy specimen had significantly lower prostate-specific antigen (PSA), recurrence-free survival, and OS than those without any GPx2 expression.69 Downregulation of GPx3 significantly correlated with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma,70 cervical cancer,71 and gallbladder cancer.72 GPx3 is considered to be a novel tumor suppressor, because hypermethylation of the GPx3 promoter was detected in tumor samples from patients with Barrett’s esophagus35–37 as well as endometrial38 and prostate cancers,39 and downregulation of GPx3 was generally associated with a poor prognosis. However, so far, no prognostic significance of GPxs protein expression in NSCLC patients has been reported. The current findings of prognostic values of individual mRNA expression of GPxs in NSCLC patients indicate some members of the GPx family may also have prognostic values in NSCLC patients, and this needs further study.
  72 in total

1.  GPX2 overexpression indicates poor prognosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ting Liu; Xue-Feng Kan; Charlie Ma; Li-Li Chen; Tian-Tian Cheng; Zhen-Wei Zou; Yong Li; Feng-Jun Cao; Wen-Jie Zhang; Jing Yao; Pin-Dong Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2017-06

2.  Prognostic significance of glutathione peroxidase 2 in gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Dongzhe Liu; Liang Sun; Jinxue Tong; Xiuhui Chen; Hui Li; Qifan Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2017-06

3.  GPX2 overexpression is involved in cell proliferation and prognosis of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Taku Naiki; Aya Naiki-Ito; Makoto Asamoto; Noriyasu Kawai; Keiichi Tozawa; Toshiki Etani; Shinya Sato; Shugo Suzuki; Tomoyuki Shirai; Kenjiro Kohri; Satoru Takahashi
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  Overexpression of glutathione peroxidase 1 predicts poor prognosis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jae Ryung Lee; Jong-Lyel Roh; Sun Mi Lee; Yangsoon Park; Kyung-Ja Cho; Seung-Ho Choi; Soon Yuhl Nam; Sang Yoon Kim
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-06-26       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Suppression of the malignant phenotype in pancreatic cancer by overexpression of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase.

Authors:  Jingru Liu; Juan Du; Yuping Zhang; Wenqing Sun; Brian J Smith; Larry W Oberley; Joseph J Cullen
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.695

Review 6.  Physiological functions of GPx2 and its role in inflammation-triggered carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Regina Brigelius-Flohé; Anna Patricia Kipp
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 7.  New prognostic factors in breast cancer.

Authors:  Adam Adam Maciejczyk
Journal:  Adv Clin Exp Med       Date:  2013 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.727

8.  Proteomic analysis of acquired tamoxifen resistance in MCF-7 cells reveals expression signatures associated with enhanced migration.

Authors:  Changhua Zhou; Qiu Zhong; Lyndsay V Rhodes; Ian Townley; Melyssa R Bratton; Qiang Zhang; Elizabeth C Martin; Steven Elliott; Bridgette M Collins-Burow; Matthew E Burow; Guangdi Wang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Loss of glutathione peroxidase 3 expression is correlated with epigenetic mechanisms in endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Eva Falck; Sandra Karlsson; Jessica Carlsson; Gisela Helenius; Mats Karlsson; Karin Klinga-Levan
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 10.  Combination of immunotherapy with chemotherapy and radiotherapy in lung cancer: is this the beginning of the end for cancer?

Authors:  Chiara Lazzari; Niki Karachaliou; Alessandra Bulotta; Mariagrazia Viganó; Aurora Mirabile; Elena Brioschi; Mariacarmela Santarpia; Luca Gianni; Rafael Rosell; Vanesa Gregorc
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 8.168

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  The beginning of GPX2 and 30 years later.

Authors:  R Steven Esworthy; James H Doroshow; Fong-Fong Chu
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 8.101

2.  Drug repositioning in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using gene co-expression and drug-gene interaction networks analysis.

Authors:  Habib MotieGhader; Parinaz Tabrizi-Nezhadi; Mahshid Deldar Abad Paskeh; Behzad Baradaran; Ahad Mokhtarzadeh; Mehrdad Hashemi; Hossein Lanjanian; Seyed Mehdi Jazayeri; Masoud Maleki; Ehsan Khodadadi; Sajjad Nematzadeh; Farzad Kiani; Mazaher Maghsoudloo; Ali Masoudi-Nejad
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.996

3.  SYVN1/GPX5 axis affects ischemia/reperfusion induced apoptosis of AC16 cells by regulating ROS generation.

Authors:  Jiehan Zhang; Shengyang Jiang; Cheng Lu; Jiadong Pang; Huajie Xu; Fenghua Yang; Shaowei Zhuang
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

4.  Identification of novel antioxidant gene signature to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Xuan Wang; Nan Wang; Li Ma; Xin Xie; Hao Zhang; Huafeng Kang; Zhangjian Zhou
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.754

5.  Distinct expression pattern and prognostic values of pituitary tumor transforming gene family genes in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Shaolong Yang; Xiaodi Wang; Jingxing Liu; Bisha Ding; Kairi Shi; Jing Chen; Weiyang Lou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.967

6.  The reversal of drug resistance by two-dimensional titanium carbide Ti2 C (2D Ti2C) in non-small-cell lung cancer via the depletion of intracellular antioxidant reserves.

Authors:  Yue Zhu; Baiyan Sui; Xin Liu; Jiao Sun
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  Glutathione peroxidase 2 is a metabolic driver of the tumor immune microenvironment and immune checkpoint inhibitor response.

Authors:  Kazi Mokim Ahmed; Ratna Veeramachaneni; Defeng Deng; Nagireddy Putluri; Vasanta Putluri; Maria F Cardenas; David A Wheeler; William K Decker; Andy I Frederick; Sawad Kazi; Andrew G Sikora; Vlad C Sandulache; Mitchell J Frederick
Journal:  J Immunother Cancer       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 12.469

8.  Distinct expression and prognostic value of members of SMAD family in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhenguo Zeng; Yuting Yang; Cheng Qing; Zhiguo Hu; Yiming Huang; Chaoqi Zhou; Dan Li; Yanxia Jiang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Identification the prognostic value of glutathione peroxidases expression levels in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jie Wei; Qiongni Xie; Xinran Liu; Chengyao Wan; Wenqi Wu; Kuiyan Fang; Yibin Yao; Peng Cheng; Donghong Deng; Zhenfang Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

10.  Glutathione Peroxidase 8 as a Prognostic Biomarker of Gastric Cancer: An Analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Data.

Authors:  Xinxin Zhang; Dankai Zhan; Yingying Li; Hui Wang; Chen Cheng; Yue Yao; Jianguang Jia
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-05-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.