Relationship between obstructive lung disease and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Korean population: Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2007-2010.

Purpose: Previous studies have shown that progressive forms of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) occur frequently in patients with obstructive lung disease (OLD). However, few studies have written about this relationship. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between OLD and NAFLD. Subjects and methods: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey is a national population-based, cross-sectional surveillance program that was initiated to assess the health and nutritional status of the Korean population. From 2007 to 2010, 11,738 subjects were enrolled. The subjects were defined as having NAFLD when they had scores higher than -0.640 in a NAFLD liver fat score prediction model, which was a previously validated prediction score. Individuals with forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity <0.7 were considered to have OLD. The subjects were divided into non-OLD and OLD groups and non-NAFLD and NAFLD groups. All analyses were performed using sample weighting using the complex samples plan.
Results: The prevalences of NAFLD and OLD were 30.2% and 8.9%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, subjects in the NAFLD group involved a higher tendency of having OLD than did those in the non-NAFLD group (8.5% vs 10.0%, respectively, P=0.060). Subjects with OLD showed a higher tendency to have NAFLD than non-OLD subjects (30.0% vs 33.7%, respectively, P=0.060). NAFLD subjects were at higher odds of OLD (odds ratio=1.334; 95% confidence interval=1.108-1.607, P=0.002) than non-NAFLD subjects, after adjusting for age, sex, and smoking history. OLD subjects were at higher odds of NAFLD (odds ratio=1.556; 95% confidence interval=1.288-1.879, P<0.001) than non-OLD subjects, after adjusting for age, sex, and smoking history.
Conclusion: This study showed that NAFLD is related to OLD. Clinicians should be aware of possible liver comorbidities in OLD patients and that extrahepatic disease in NAFLD patients may vary more than previously thought.

Introduction

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is characterized by hepatic triglyceride accumulation, known as steatosis, and the absence of significant alcohol consumption or secondary causes (eg, viral hepatitis).1 Stemming from overnutrition and less physical activity, NAFLD has become the most common form of chronic liver damage. Increased prevalences of obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome have been recorded in developed and developing countries, drawing concern.2 NAFLD has been considered a hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome and is associated with various metabolic abnormalities, including hyperlipidemia, central obesity, type 2 diabetes, and the development of cardiovascular disease.3–5

Obstructive lung disease (OLD) is a category of respiratory disease characterized by airway obstruction.6 In patients with OLD, including those with COPD, metabolic syndrome occurs frequently.7 Emerging evidence shows that pulmonary function impairment is connected not only with cigarette smoking but also with obesity, type 2 diabetes, and insulin resistance, all of which are linked to increased oxidative stress and chronic, low-grade inflammation.8–10 Additionally, prospective studies have documented that pulmonary function impairment is an independent predictor of cardiovascular disease-related morbidity and mortality.11,12

Few studies have reported the relationship between NAFLD and impaired lung function. Lonardo et al13 believed that there is strong epidemiological and clinical evidence supporting the notion that NAFLD and COPD, which are highly prevalent, non-communicable, lifestyle-related systemic disorders primarily clustered in the metabolic and cardiovascular area with a similar pathogenic background and a high comorbidity rate, are related not by chance but also by pathobiological necessity. However, this relationship has not been evaluated thoroughly. We performed a Korean population-based study to evaluate the relationship between NAFLD and OLD. We aimed to evaluate whether 1) individuals with NAFLD are at higher odds of developing OLD than non-NAFLD individuals and 2) individuals with OLD are at higher odds of developing NAFLD than non-OLD individuals.

Subjects and methods

Study subjects

The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) is a national population-based, cross-sectional surveillance program that uses stratified random sampling to assess the health and nutritional status of Korean people.14 The Korea Centers of Disease Control and Prevention performed this survey to obtain statistically reliable and representative data; patients in nursing homes, soldiers, prisoners, and foreigners were excluded. A stratified, multistage probability sampling design, considering location and residence type, was used in the KNHANES to establish nationwide representativeness. The KNHANES database is publicly available at the KNHANES website (http://knhanes.cdc.go.kr/knhanes/eng; available in English).

A flow diagram of the subjects who were included in this study is depicted in Figure S1. Among the 33,829 subjects with data in the KNHANES, 2007–2010, we selected those aged ≥20 years (24,875 subjects), since pulmonary function tests were performed for subjects aged ≥20 years. Cross-sectional surveys that were conducted over a period of 4 years were pooled for analysis. Subjects with missing data for pulmonary function test, liver function test, alcoholic consumption, or hepatitis viral test were excluded (n=9,920). Additionally, subjects who met the following criteria based on our protocol were excluded: 1) alcohol consumption >140 g/week for men and >70 g/week for women (n=2,703) and 2) positivity for serologic markers for hepatitis B (n=490) and hepatitis C virus (n=24). Finally, 11,738 subjects were included in the analysis and divided into groups according to whether OLD and NAFLD were present.

Clinical and laboratory parameters

Information regarding age, height, body weight, waist circumference, smoking, drinking, and additional laboratory results known to be related to NAFLD or OLD was collected for all study subjects. Age was categorized into three levels: <40, 40–59, and ≥60 years. Responses to a questionnaire about smoking habits were categorized as never, past, or current. We excluded those with heavy alcohol consumption, which was defined as >140 g/week for men and >70 g/week for women.

After the subjects fasted overnight for >8 hours, blood samples were drawn from all participants during the survey, immediately refrigerated, and transported to the central testing institute (Neodin Medical Institute, Seoul, Republic of Korea). All blood samples were analyzed within 24 hours after transportation. The serum levels of lipid and liver enzyme profiles were determined using a Hitachi 8,700 automated chemistry analyzer (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) using specifically indicated methods. Spirometry data that were obtained by a qualified technician were assessed by another trained technician and the principal investigator to determine whether these data met the criteria for acceptability and reproducibility.

Hepatic steatosis and OLD definitions

NAFLD was defined using a previous validated fatty liver prediction model: NAFLD liver fat score (LFS).15 Using this model, the risk score for NAFLD was determined as follows:

NAFLD LFS = −2.89 + 1.18 × metabolic syndrome (yes=1/no=0) + 0.45 × type 2 diabetes (yes=2/no=0) + 0.15 × fasting sugar-insulin (mU/L) + 0.04 × (fasting sugar-aspartate aminotransferase/fasting sugar-alanine aminotransferase).

Metabolic syndrome was defined according to the criteria of the International Diabetes Federation16 (waist circumference, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, fasting glucose); type 2 diabetes was defined according to the criteria of the American Diabetes Association.17 In this prediction model, individuals with values greater than −0.640 were considered to have NAFLD.15 Individuals with forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity <0.7 were considered to have OLD.

Statistical analysis

The baseline characteristics of NAFLD and non-NAFLD subjects and those of OLD and non-OLD subjects were compared using an unpaired t-test for continuous variables or the chi-squared test for categorical variables and are presented as a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) and percentage. Continuous data were tested for data normality and variance homogeneity. To evaluate the relationship between NAFLD and OLD while controlling potential confounding factors, multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds ratio [OR] for NAFLD and OLD. Potential confounding variables, including age, sex, smoking history, and NAFLD, were controlled in an OLD regression model. Variables, including age, sex, smoking history, and OLD, were controlled in the regression model of NAFLD. ORs and 95% CIs were calculated. Of the variables we collected, metabolic syndrome, diabetes, hypertension, liver function, and body mass index (obesity) were not included in the multiple logistic regression models, because they were included in the calculation of LFS.

As the KNHANES data are collected using a complex sampling design, the survey weights are provided. All analyses were performed using sample weighting using the complex samples plan, which is available as the complex samples option in the high version of SPSS (IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA), to represent the total, non-institutionalized civilian population in Korea. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corporation). An adjusted P-value<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethics statement

This study was approved annually from 2007 to 2010 by the institutional review board of the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (approval numbers: 2007-02CON-04-P, 2008-04EXP-01-C, 2009-01CON-03-2C, and 2010-02CON-21-C). The study was conducted in accordance with the ethical principles of the amended Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from each study participant.

Results

The weighted study population comprised 23,547,091 individuals. There were 16,415,120 and 7,131,971 non-NAFLD and NAFLD subjects, respectively. Furthermore, there were 21,433,227 and 2,113,864 non-OLD and OLD subjects, respectively.

The baseline characteristics of subjects with and without NAFLD are shown in Table 1. NAFLD subjects were older than non-NAFLD subjects (45.93 vs 51.81 years, respectively, P<0.001) and had a higher body mass index (23.27 vs 26.03 kg/m2, respectively, P<0.001). The NAFLD group also had more ex-smokers (3.3% vs 5.9%, respectively, P<0.001), current smokers (31.9% vs 37.9%, respectively P<0.001), and a higher proportion of men (35.8% vs 48.3%, respectively, P<0.001) than did the non-NAFLD group. As hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome were included in the calculation of having NAFLD, subjects reported having these conditions more frequently than the non-NAFLD subjects did. NAFLD subjects showed decreased lung function, higher liver enzyme levels, and higher liver function scores than the non-NAFLD subjects. Although not statistically significant, subjects in the NAFLD group had a higher tendency to have OLD than those in the non-NAFLD group (8.5% vs 10.0%, respectively, P=0.060).

Table 1

Subject characteristics according to the presence of NAFLD

Variables	Non-NAFLD group	NAFLD group	P-value
Unweighted number, n (%)	8,168 (69.6)	3,570 (30.4)
Estimated population, n (%)	16,415,120 (69.8)	7,131,971 (30.2)
Age (years), %	45.93 (45.22–46.64)	51.81 (50.84–52.78)	<0.001
20–39	36.9 (34.8–39.1)	23.9 (21.4–26.6)	<0.001
40–59	42.1 (40.2–44.0)	40.7 (38.3–43.1)	<0.001
60+	21.0 (19.6–22.5)	35.4 (33.1–37.8)	<0.001
Sex (male), %	35.8 (34.2–37.4)	48.3 (45.8–50.8)	<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)	23.27 (23.17–23.38)	26.03 (25.85–26.21)	<0.001
Smoking, %			<0.001
Non-smoker	64.8 (63.2–66.4)	56.2 (53.7–58.6)
Ex-smoker	3.3 (2.8–3.8)	5.9 (4.9–7.1)
Current smoker	31.9 (30.3–33.6)	37.9 (35.5–40.4)
Smoking amount (PYRs)	18.13 (16.93–19.32)	19.28 (17.83–20.73)	<0.001
Metabolic syndrome, %	12.6 (11.4–13.8)	74.6 (72.1–77.0)	<0.001
Diabetes mellitus, %	1.8 (1.5–2.2)	24.2 (22.2–26.2)	<0.001
Hypertension, %	15.5 (14.3–16.8)	50.0 (47.3–52.7)	<0.001
Pulmonary function test
FVC (L)	3.56 (3.52–3.59)	3.51 (3.45–3.56)	<0.001
FEV1 (L)	2.86 (2.83–2.89)	2.78 (2.74–2.82)	<0.001
FEV1 (%)	92.62 (92.15–93.08)	91.07 (90.44–91.70)	<0.001
FEV1/FVC ratio	0.80 (0.80–0.81)	0.79 (0.79–0.80)	<0.001
OLD, %	8.5 (7.7–9.4)	10.0 (8.8–11.4)	0.060
AST (IU/L)	19.75 (19.50–20.01)	27.22 (26.37–28.07)	<0.001
ALT (IU/L)	17.40 (17.09–17.71)	33.89 (32.53–35.25)	<0.001
LFSa	−1.83 (−1.86 to −1.80)	0.63 (0.55–0.71)	<0.001

Notes: Values are presented as percentage and mean (95% CI) unless otherwise specified. OLD is defined as FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7.

LFS = 22.89 + 1.18 × metabolic syndrome + 0.45 × diabetes + 0.15 × fasting insulin + 0.04 × AST (IU/l) + 0.94 × AST/ALT ratio.

Abbreviations: NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; BMI, body mass index; PYRs, pack years; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume; OLD, obstructive lung disease; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; LFS, liver fat score; CI, confidence interval.

The baseline characteristics of subjects with and without OLD are shown in Table S1. OLD subjects were older than non-OLD subjects (46.08 vs 64.25 years, respectively, P<0.001). Moreover, the OLD group had more ex- (3.3% vs 11.8%, respectively, P<0.001) and current smokers (32.0% vs 51.0%, respectively, P<0.001) and a higher proportion of men (37.2% vs 63.3%, respectively, P<0.001) than the OLD group. Non-OLD subjects had a higher body mass index than the OLD subjects (24.18 vs 23.36 kg/m2, respectively, P<0.001). OLD subjects reported having hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome, which are related to NAFLD, more frequently than the non-OLD subjects did. OLD subjects showed decreased lung function, higher liver enzyme levels, and higher liver function scores than the non-OLD subjects. They also showed a higher tendency to have NAFLD than the non-OLD subjects (30.0% vs 33.7%, respectively, P=0.060).

Tables 2 and 3 show the relationships between OLD and NAFLD in the logistic regression models. When age, sex, smoking status, and OLD were included in the regression model (Table 2), OLD (OR=1.556, 95% CI=1.288–1.879, P<0.001) was significantly related to NAFLD. Higher age (40–59 years: OR=1.917, 95% CI=1.682–2.185, P<0.001, and ≥60 years: OR=3.011, 95% CI=2.509–3.613, P<0.001) and male sex (OR=1.852, 95% CI=1.538–2.231, P<0.001) showed significant correlations with NAFLD. Unlike OLD, smoking status (ex-smoker: OR=0.980, 95% CI=0.808–1.189, P=0.694 and current smoker: OR=0.890, 95% CI=0.681–1.163, P=0.694) did not show a significant correlation with NAFLD.

Table 2

Logistic regression analyses of factors related to NAFLD

Variables	OR	95% CI	P-value
Age, years
20–39	1.000
40–59	1.917	1.682–2.185	,0.001
60+	3.011	2.509–3.613	,0.001
Sex, male	1.852	1.538–2.231	,0.001
Smoking status
Never smoker	1.000
Ex-smoker	0.980	0.808–1.189	0.694
Current smoker	0.890	0.681–1.163	0.694
OLD	1.556	1.288–1.879	,0.001

Note: Values are presented as ORs with 95% CIs.

Abbreviations: NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; OLD, obstructive lung disease.

Table 3

Logistic regression analyses of factors related to OLD

Variables	OR	95% CI	P-value
Age, years
20–39	1.000
40–59	6.196	5.102–7.525	,0.001
60+	27.402	17.135–43.820	,0.001
Sex, male	2.159	1.628–2.864	,0.001
Smoking status
Never smoker	1.000
Ex-smoker	2.227	1.569–3.300	,0.001
Current smoker	2.016	1.517–2.680	,0.001
NAFLD	1.334	1.108–1.607	0.002

Note: Values are presented as ORs with 95% CIs.

Abbreviations: OLD, obstructive lung disease; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

When age, sex, smoking status, and NAFLD were included in the regression model (Table 3), NAFLD (OR=1.334, 95% CI=1.108–1.607, P=0.002) was significantly related to OLD. Higher age (40–59 years: OR=6.196, 95% CI=5.102–7.525, P<0.001 and ≥60 years: OR=27.402, 95% CI=17.135–43.820, P<0.001), male sex (OR=2.159, 95% CI=1.628–2.864, P<0.001), and smoking status (ex-smoker: OR=2.227, 95% CI=1.569–3.300, P<0.001; current smoker: OR=2.016, 95% CI=1.517–2.680, P<0.001) showed significant correlations with OLD.

Discussion

The major strength of this study is that it is a large population-based study using thoroughly collected national data, which enhances the statistical reliability of the results and our ability to generalize the data. Furthermore, to our knowledge, no studies have analyzed ORs of OLD in NAFLD subjects and ORs of NAFLD in OLD subjects in a large population-based study. Owing to the characteristics of the KNHANES, we could analyze the ORs of NAFLD and OLD subjects in both ways. By doing so, we could reveal a precise relationship between OLD and NAFLD. We demonstrated that NAFLD patients are at higher odds of developing OLD than did non-NAFLD patients and that OLD patients are at higher odds of developing NAFLD than non-OLD patients. In light of the results of this study, we suggest that physicians should be more aware of possible liver comorbidities in OLD patients and that extrahepatic disease in NAFLD patients may vary more than previously thought. Furthermore, we believe that this study could provide valuable information for future studies. The validity of the reported confounding factors was also confirmed in this study population, which supports the consistency of the present findings. Subjects of higher age,18 male sex,19 and smoking history18 were at higher odds of OLD, while subjects of higher age and male sex20 were at higher odds of NAFLD.

In previous studies, the estimated prevalence of NAFLD was 20%–35% among the general population.21 In Korea, in a study of 141,610 adults who lived in an urban area and were 18–80 years old, the prevalence of NAFLD was 27.3%.22 In this study, the prevalence of NAFLD was 30.2%. The difference in the prevalences of NAFLD may be due to differences in the study population (eg, age and urban-dwelling area) and method (eg, ultrasonography and LFS). Additionally, in a previous study, the prevalence of OLD among 13,835 American adult subjects aged 19–80 years was 11.8%,23 and it was 13.1% in a study of 16,151 adults in Korea aged ≥40 years.24 The prevalence of OLD in this study was 8.9%. The difference may be due to the study population: we excluded subjects with hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus and those who consumed alcohol heavily.

Several previous studies have described a relationship between NAFLD and OLD. In a study of 111 subjects with COPD, Viglino et al25 showed that NAFLD is highly prevalent in individuals with COPD and might contribute to cardiometabolic comorbidities. Similarly, Mapel and Marton26 and Qin et al27 demonstrated that subjects who have impaired lung function or are diagnosed with COPD are at a higher risk of developing NAFLD. Other studies14,17,28,29 showed that NAFLD and liver disease patients have impaired lung function or a higher prevalence of COPD. In this context, the findings of this study verified and supported those of previous studies.

Over the last decade, it has been shown that the clinical burden of NAFLD is not only confined to liver-related morbidity and mortality but also that NAFLD is a multisystemic disease that affects the extrahepatic organs and regulatory pathways.30 Excessive free fatty acids and chronic low-grade inflammation in visceral adipose tissue are considered to be two of the most important factors contributing to the progression of liver injury in NAFLD patients.31 In addition, secretion of adipokines from visceral adipose tissue, as well as lipid accumulation in the liver, further promotes inflammation, which is activated by free fatty acids and contributes to insulin resistance.31 Similarly, OLD patients also tend to present with multiple comorbidities more frequently than those without OLD. The most frequent comorbidities that accompany OLD include cardiovascular diseases, metabolic disorders, osteoporosis, dysfunction of skeletal muscle, anxiety, depression, cognitive impairment, gastrointestinal diseases, and respiratory conditions, such as asthma, bronchiectasis, pulmonary fibrosis, and lung cancer.7 OLD is associated with high levels of systemic inflammation, probably secondary to pulmonary inflammation.20

Various inflammatory cytokines are related to NAFLD. Tumor necrosis factor alpha might play an initial role in the occurrence of steatosis, while leptin is known to have pro-steatotic and pro-fibrotic actions.32 An elevation in serum levels of interleukin-8 has been observed in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis33 and alcoholic liver disease.34 Moreover, the involvement of oxidative stress has been confirmed in the development of NAFLD.35 Inflammation and oxidative stress that cascades from NAFLD may play a crucial role in the pathogenesis of pulmonary function impairment. Meanwhile, Keatings et al36 reported that statistically significant increases of interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha were related to the severity of airway diseases. In a rat model, Liang et al37 reported that the frequency of acute exacerbation and severity of COPD were associated with a higher leptin level. Furthermore, oxidative stress is now recognized as a major predisposing factor in the pathogenesis of COPD.38 As mentioned previously, these markers were also related to the pathogenesis of NAFLD. This could be a possible mechanism for the findings in this study. However, it is uncertain whether inflammation due to NAFLD would trigger OLD inflammation or whether inflammation due to OLD would trigger NAFLD inflammation. Therefore, further studies concerning the biochemical and metabolic mechanisms of these conditions are required.

This study has some limitations. First, we did not perform a liver biopsy, which is the gold standard for confirming a NAFLD diagnosis and providing prognostic information, nor did we perform ultrasonography, which is the most common diagnosis method.39 However, neither method was included in the KNHANES data. Instead, we used an indirect method: the NAFLD LFS. The NAFLD LFS shows a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 71%.15 To increase the accuracy of identifying NAFLD, we excluded subjects with hepatitis B and hepatitis C viruses and those with heavy alcohol consumption. We believe that using the NAFLD LFS was reasonable for performing an epidemiologic study to identify the relationship between NAFLD and OLD. In future studies, the combination of biomarkers/scores and transient elastography with liver ultrasonography, which were not performed in the current study, might confer additional diagnostic accuracy. Second, because a pulmonary test was not mandatory, some patients may have refused to take the pulmonary function test. In addition, patients with severe COPD may have had low survey participation. Therefore, the number of cases was possibly underestimated. Finally, this study only identified a relationship between OLD and NAFLD, but not an association between OLD and NAFLD. As this was a cross-sectional study, further studies are needed to reveal the causality between OLD and NAFLD.

Conclusion

This study showed that NAFLD is associated with OLD. Physicians should be aware of possible liver comorbidities in OLD patients and that extrahepatic disease in NAFLD patients may vary more than previously thought. Further studies concerning the biochemical and metabolic mechanisms of NAFLD and OLD are required.

Flow diagram of the subjects who were included in this study.

Abbreviations: PFT, pulmonary function test; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HCV, hepatitis C virus; OLD, obstructive lung disease; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

Table S1

Subject characteristics according to the presence of OLD

Variables	Non-OLD group	OLD group	P-value
Unweighted number, n (%)	10,459 (89.1)	1,279 (10.9)
Estimated population, n (%)	21,433,227 (91.1)	2,113,864 (8.9)
Age (years), %	46.08 (45.47–46.70)	64.25 (63.03–65.47)	<0.001
20–39	35.7 (33.9–37.6)	5.1 (3.3–7.9)	<0.001
40–59	43.2 (41.6–44.9)	25.5 (22.2–29.1)	<0.001
60+	21.0 (19.8–22.3)	69.4 (65.5–73.1)	<0.001
Sex (male), %	37.2 (35.8–38.6)	63.3 (59.1–67.3)	<0.001
BMI (kg/m2)	24.18 (24.09–24.29)	23.36 (23.10–23.63)	<0.001
Smoking, %
Non-smoker	64.7 (63.3–66.0)	37.2 (33.2–41.4)	<0.001
Ex-smoker	3.3 (2.9–3.8)	11.8 (9.4–14.8)	<0.001
Current smoker	32.0 (30.7–33.5)	51.0 (46.4–55.6)	<0.001
Smoking history (PYRs)	16.83 (15.78–17.87)	27.80 (25.23–30.38)	<0.001
Metabolic syndrome, %	29.9 (28.4–31.3)	46.7 (42.6–50.8)	<0.001
Diabetes mellitus, %	7.9 (7.2–8.7)	15.3 (12.7–18.3)	<0.001
Hypertension, %	26.2 (24.9–27.5)	47.8 (43.9–51.8)	<0.001
Pulmonary function test
FVC (L)	3.56 (3.53–3.59)	3.34 (63.03–65.47)	<0.001
FEV1 (L)	2.91 (2.88–2.93)	2.12 (2.06–2.17)	<0.001
FEV1 (%)	93.73 (93.36–94.11)	76.06 (74.88–77.23)	<0.001
FEV1/FVC ratio	0.82 (0.81–0.82)	0.63 (0.63–0.64)	<0.001
AST (IU/L)	21.94 (21.57–22.31)	22.80 (22.21–23.38)	<0.001
ALT (IU/L)	22.57 (22.01–23.14)	20.60 (19.77–21.43)	<0.001
LFSa	−1.10 (−1.15 to −1.05)	−0.98 (−1.13 to −0.82)	<0.001
NAFLD, %	30.0 (28.6–31.3)	33.7 (30–37.6)	0.060

Notes: Values are presented as percentage and mean (95% CI) unless otherwise specified.

LFS = 22.89 + 1.18 × metabolic syndrome + 0.45 × diabetes + 0.15 × fasting insulin + 0.04 × AST (IU/l) + 0.94 × AST/ALT ratio. OLD is defined as FEV1/FVC ratio <0.7.

Abbreviations: OLD, obstructive lung disease; BMI, Body Mass Index; PYRs, pack years; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1, forced expiratory volume; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; LFS, liver fat score; NAFLD, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease; CI, confidence interval.