Avani D Rao1, Qinyu Chen1, Lynn Million2, Sheri L Spunt3, Thomas J Fitzgerald4, Chen Hu1, Sandesh S Rao5, Fran Laurie6, Sandy Kessel6, Karen Morano6, Matthew M Ladra1, Stephanie A Terezakis7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts. 5. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) Rhode Island, Lincoln, Rhode Island. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. Electronic address: sterezak@jhmi.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: For pediatric patients with large, high-grade, extremity nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas, preoperative radiation therapy (RT) provides the opportunity for smaller radiation fields and tumor shrinkage resulting in less extensive surgery. The potential disadvantage is an increased risk of wound complications after surgery compared with rates after postoperative chemoradiation. We assessed the impact of preoperative RT technique on target coverage in relationship to dose to skin and adjacent joints to determine whether acute wound complications and late musculoskeletal injury might be influenced by treatment technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 550 eligible patients <30 years of age, 200 were enrolled in arm D of ARST0332 and received neoadjuvant ifosfamide/doxorubicin, then chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy and ifosfamide) and surgery followed by postoperative RT if gross or microscopic positive surgical margins. One-hundred thirteen patients had extremity nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas, of which 56 patients had preoperative RT plans for digital review. The doses to the target volume, skin (surface to 5 mm depth), adjacent joint, and extremity diameter were analyzed with respect to RT technique. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (65%) received 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) and 18 (32%) received intensity modulated RT (IMRT). There was no difference in clinical target volume (CTV) size between groups (P = .920); however, IMRT plans had improved CTV coverage to 100% of the prescription dose compared with 3D-CRT plans (median CTV coverage, 92.7% vs 98.6%; P = .011). In patients without target overlap with the skin, IMRT use was associated with reduced percent volume of skin receiving 45 Gy or more (V45Gy) compared with 3D-CRT (median, 1.6% vs 6.3%, respectively; P = .005). IMRT was also associated with reduced V45Gy to the adjacent joint compared with 3D-CRT (median, 1.1% vs 13.2%; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IMRT may improve CTV coverage and reduce the volume of skin and adjacent joint treated to high doses. Future studies should assess whether these dosimetric findings produce differences in clinical and toxicity outcomes.
PURPOSE: For pediatric patients with large, high-grade, extremity nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas, preoperative radiation therapy (RT) provides the opportunity for smaller radiation fields and tumor shrinkage resulting in less extensive surgery. The potential disadvantage is an increased risk of wound complications after surgery compared with rates after postoperative chemoradiation. We assessed the impact of preoperative RT technique on target coverage in relationship to dose to skin and adjacent joints to determine whether acute wound complications and late musculoskeletal injury might be influenced by treatment technique. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 550 eligible patients <30 years of age, 200 were enrolled in arm D of ARST0332 and received neoadjuvant ifosfamide/doxorubicin, then chemoradiotherapy (45 Gy and ifosfamide) and surgery followed by postoperative RT if gross or microscopic positive surgical margins. One-hundred thirteen patients had extremity nonrhabdomyosarcoma soft-tissue sarcomas, of which 56 patients had preoperative RT plans for digital review. The doses to the target volume, skin (surface to 5 mm depth), adjacent joint, and extremity diameter were analyzed with respect to RT technique. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients (65%) received 3-dimensional conformal RT (3D-CRT) and 18 (32%) received intensity modulated RT (IMRT). There was no difference in clinical target volume (CTV) size between groups (P = .920); however, IMRT plans had improved CTV coverage to 100% of the prescription dose compared with 3D-CRT plans (median CTV coverage, 92.7% vs 98.6%; P = .011). In patients without target overlap with the skin, IMRT use was associated with reduced percent volume of skin receiving 45 Gy or more (V45Gy) compared with 3D-CRT (median, 1.6% vs 6.3%, respectively; P = .005). IMRT was also associated with reduced V45Gy to the adjacent joint compared with 3D-CRT (median, 1.1% vs 13.2%; P = .018). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative IMRT may improve CTV coverage and reduce the volume of skin and adjacent joint treated to high doses. Future studies should assess whether these dosimetric findings produce differences in clinical and toxicity outcomes.
Authors: Lynn Million; Andrea Hayes-Jordan; Yueh-Yun Chi; Sarah S Donaldson; Suzanne Wolden; Carol Morris; Stephanie Terezakis; Fran Laurie; Karen Morano; T J Fitzgerald; Torunn I Yock; David A Rodeberg; James R Anderson; Rose Anne Speights; Jennifer O Black; Cheryl Coffin; Mary Beth McCarville; Simon C Kao; Douglas S Hawkins; Sheri L Spunt; R Lor Randall Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 8.013
Authors: Andrea Ferrari; Bernadette Brennan; Michela Casanova; Nadege Corradini; Pablo Berlanga; Reineke A Schoot; Gema L Ramirez-Villar; Akmal Safwat; Gabriela Guillen Burrieza; Patrizia Dall'Igna; Rita Alaggio; Lisa Lyngsie Hjalgrim; Susanne Andrea Gatz; Daniel Orbach; Max M van Noesel Journal: Cancer Manag Res Date: 2022-09-23 Impact factor: 3.602