Catherine A Koss1, Albert Y Liu2, Jose Castillo-Mancilla3, Peter Bacchetti4, Cricket McHugh5, Karen Kuncze1, Mary Morrow6, Alexander Louie1, Sharon Seifert5, Hideaki Okochi7, Samantha MaWhinney6, Monica Gandhi1, Peter L Anderson5. 1. Division of HIV, Infectious Diseases, and Global Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California. 2. Bridge HIV, San Francisco Department of Public Health, California. 3. Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Colorado. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California. 5. Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus. 6. Department of Biostatistics and Informatics, University of Colorado, Colorado School of Public Health, Colorado. 7. Department of Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, Schools of Pharmacy and Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Women likely require higher adherence than men to preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) for similar efficacy. Pharmacologic metrics of adherence predict efficacy better than self-report, but expected drug levels (adherence benchmarks) must be established using directly observed therapy. We sought to evaluate whether tenofovir hair concentrations differ between women and men receiving directly observed TDF/FTC. METHODS: We assessed tenofovir hair concentrations in HIV-uninfected volunteers randomized to receive 100%, 67%, or 33% of daily dosing of TDF/FTC for 12 weeks (DOT-DBS, NCT02022657). Hair samples were collected at dosing weeks 4, 8, and 12 and every 3 weeks during a 12-week washout. Tenofovir concentrations in the proximal 1.5 cm of hair (representing ∼6 weeks of exposure) were analyzed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Linear regression was used to model tenofovir hair concentrations in terms of sex, doses over the prior 6 weeks, and number of days since last dose. RESULTS:A total of 264 hair samples were analyzed from 23 female and 24 male participants. Female participants had similar tenofovir hair concentrations to men (estimated fold-difference 0.92, 95% CI 0.75-1.13, P = 0.43). The estimated fold-difference in tenofovir levels for female versus male participants did not appreciably change when age (0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.15), weight (0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.11), or race/ethnicity (0.95, 95% CI 0.77-1.17) were added to the model. CONCLUSION: Women and men have similar adherence benchmarks for tenofovir in hair samples. As pharmacokinetic metrics are increasingly used for PrEP monitoring, these findings provide guidance for assessing adherence via hair concentrations.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES:Women likely require higher adherence than men to preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)/emtricitabine (FTC) for similar efficacy. Pharmacologic metrics of adherence predict efficacy better than self-report, but expected drug levels (adherence benchmarks) must be established using directly observed therapy. We sought to evaluate whether tenofovir hair concentrations differ between women and men receiving directly observed TDF/FTC. METHODS: We assessed tenofovir hair concentrations in HIV-uninfected volunteers randomized to receive 100%, 67%, or 33% of daily dosing of TDF/FTC for 12 weeks (DOT-DBS, NCT02022657). Hair samples were collected at dosing weeks 4, 8, and 12 and every 3 weeks during a 12-week washout. Tenofovir concentrations in the proximal 1.5 cm of hair (representing ∼6 weeks of exposure) were analyzed using liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry. Linear regression was used to model tenofovir hair concentrations in terms of sex, doses over the prior 6 weeks, and number of days since last dose. RESULTS: A total of 264 hair samples were analyzed from 23 female and 24 male participants. Female participants had similar tenofovir hair concentrations to men (estimated fold-difference 0.92, 95% CI 0.75-1.13, P = 0.43). The estimated fold-difference in tenofovir levels for female versus male participants did not appreciably change when age (0.93, 95% CI 0.76-1.15), weight (0.89, 95% CI 0.71-1.11), or race/ethnicity (0.95, 95% CI 0.77-1.17) were added to the model. CONCLUSION:Women and men have similar adherence benchmarks for tenofovir in hair samples. As pharmacokinetic metrics are increasingly used for PrEP monitoring, these findings provide guidance for assessing adherence via hair concentrations.
Authors: Mackenzie L Cottrell; Kuo H Yang; Heather M A Prince; Craig Sykes; Nicole White; Stephanie Malone; Evan S Dellon; Ryan D Madanick; Nicholas J Shaheen; Michael G Hudgens; Jacob Wulff; Kristine B Patterson; Julie A E Nelson; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2016-02-24 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Kristine B Patterson; Heather A Prince; Eric Kraft; Amanda J Jenkins; Nicholas J Shaheen; James F Rooney; Myron S Cohen; Angela D M Kashuba Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Catherine A Koss; Peter Bacchetti; Sharon L Hillier; Edward Livant; Howard Horng; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Brenda G Mirembe; Kailazarid Gomez Feliciano; Stephanie Horn; Albert Y Liu; David V Glidden; Robert M Grant; Leslie Z Benet; Alexander Louie; Ariane van der Straten; Z Mike Chirenje; Jeanne M Marrazzo; Monica Gandhi Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2017-03-02 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Robin DiFrancesco; Charlene R Taylor; Susan L Rosenkranz; Kelly M Tooley; Poonam G Pande; Suzanne M Siminski; Richard W Jenny; Gene D Morse Journal: Bioanalysis Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.681
Authors: Jeanne M Marrazzo; Gita Ramjee; Barbra A Richardson; Kailazarid Gomez; Nyaradzo Mgodi; Gonasagrie Nair; Thesla Palanee; Clemensia Nakabiito; Ariane van der Straten; Lisa Noguchi; Craig W Hendrix; James Y Dai; Shayhana Ganesh; Baningi Mkhize; Marthinette Taljaard; Urvi M Parikh; Jeanna Piper; Benoît Mâsse; Cynthia Grossman; James Rooney; Jill L Schwartz; Heather Watts; Mark A Marzinke; Sharon L Hillier; Ian M McGowan; Z Mike Chirenje Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Catherine A Koss; Sybil G Hosek; Peter Bacchetti; Peter L Anderson; Albert Y Liu; Howard Horng; Leslie Z Benet; Karen Kuncze; Alexander Louie; Parya Saberi; Craig M Wilson; Monica Gandhi Journal: Clin Infect Dis Date: 2018-01-06 Impact factor: 9.079
Authors: Sheena McCormack; David T Dunn; Monica Desai; David I Dolling; Mitzy Gafos; Richard Gilson; Ann K Sullivan; Amanda Clarke; Iain Reeves; Gabriel Schembri; Nicola Mackie; Christine Bowman; Charles J Lacey; Vanessa Apea; Michael Brady; Julie Fox; Stephen Taylor; Simone Antonucci; Saye H Khoo; James Rooney; Anthony Nardone; Martin Fisher; Alan McOwan; Andrew N Phillips; Anne M Johnson; Brian Gazzard; Owen N Gill Journal: Lancet Date: 2015-09-09 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Matthew A Spinelli; Jessica E Haberer; Peter R Chai; Jose Castillo-Mancilla; Peter L Anderson; Monica Gandhi Journal: Curr HIV/AIDS Rep Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 5.071
Authors: Joseph N Mwangi; William M Gilliland; Nicole White; Craig Sykes; Amanda Poliseno; Kelly A Knudtson; Lisa Hightow-Weidman; Angela D M Kashuba; Elias P Rosen Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2022-03-10 Impact factor: 5.938